• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

MT ET street R bias

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sk8trfred
  • Start date Start date Apr 23, 2018
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
Q

Qtrhrse23

Member
Jul 2, 2024
26
10
13
Texas
Jul 20, 2026
#21
  • Jul 20, 2026
  • #21
Bias ply: Yea that 2.66 first with a 3.73 will want a 26" tall tire. A 28" tire is gonna be a BOG from a start, or even a 5-10 roll. A 28" tire will bog no matter how you leave, Im talking 5500 dump. 26" is what you want.

Stiff sidewall: 26" tire wont hold a 5k dump, maybe a quick release.

For best acceleration, go 26". 28" will make you more hamstrung in 1st.

Those 26x10 ET Drag biased are probably the best bet. Or easiest. Start at 17psi, lower .5 lb until you bog. On spray, start at 14psi.
 
Last edited: Jul 20, 2026
Reactions: FastDriver

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,100
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Jul 20, 2026
#22
  • Jul 20, 2026
  • #22
Sounds like a plan. Torque box reinforcements soon, then I'll order the stiff sidewall 26s.
 
Q

Qtrhrse23

Member
Jul 2, 2024
26
10
13
Texas
Saturday at 2:03 PM
#23
  • Saturday at 2:03 PM
  • #23
Not STIFF sidewall. Rule of thumb you can ALMOST ALWAYS follow, stiff for auto, regular for manual. The manual SHOCKS or HITS the tires too hard, so more flex necessary.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,100
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Saturday at 2:15 PM
#24
  • Saturday at 2:15 PM
  • #24
It's the other way around, bud. At least from the research I did and from MT's recommendation. Stiffs for manuals and heavy cars. Mine is both.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT
Q

Qtrhrse23

Member
Jul 2, 2024
26
10
13
Texas
Saturday at 6:59 PM
#25
  • Saturday at 6:59 PM
  • #25
Soft sidewall ABSORBS the hard hit of the dumped clutch. Stiff sidewall cant flex-spins. Ive raced both, never could get the stiffs to hook unless you ride the clutch. Thats all I know. More research needed. Soft sidewalls give the most traction, but stiff sidewalls will drive/et better. The better straighter feel is what the stiff sides are ALL about.

How heavy? Less than 4000?
 
Last edited: Saturday at 7:07 PM

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,100
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Saturday at 8:29 PM
#26
  • Saturday at 8:29 PM
  • #26
Qtrhrse23 said:
Soft sidewall ABSORBS the hard hit of the dumped clutch. Stiff sidewall cant flex-spins. Ive raced both, never could get the stiffs to hook unless you ride the clutch. Thats all I know. More research needed. Soft sidewalls give the most traction, but stiff sidewalls will drive/et better. The better straighter feel is what the stiff sides are ALL about.

How heavy? Less than 4000?
Click to expand...
Yeah, race weight should be under 3,500 with me in it.

I get what you’re saying, and that’s exactly what had me going back and forth. Several guys made the same point that the regular sidewall can absorb more of the clutch hit. Mickey Thompson’s own construction guide says: “ST = Suggested for manual transmission (Medium compound – M5)” and “S = Stiff sidewall construction. Recommended for 4 link suspension cars, heavy cars (over 3000lb.), and ‘soft ride’ Rear Engine Dragsters. Can aid in quicker reaction times due to less tire distortion.” Mine is a stick car and over 3,000 lb, so that pushed me toward the stiffwall.

Where I landed is that if I just dump the clutch hard, I’m probably going to blow the tire off either way without a very sorted/tunable suspension. So I’m not really expecting the tire to do all the clutch’s job. I’m expecting to still have to work/slip the clutch some. Since I could see the argument both ways, the tie-breaker for me was the better/straighter high-speed feel and MT’s recommendation.

I noticed that these tires still wrinkle up on at least 1/3 of the sidewall, and I decided to run them tubeless. I'm not expecting a world beater, but if my 1.8x 60' on Nittos turns into 1.6 or better, I'd be very happy.
 
Last edited: Sunday at 10:18 PM
Reactions: General karthief
Q

Qtrhrse23

Member
Jul 2, 2024
26
10
13
Texas
Yesterday at 6:59 AM
#27
  • Yesterday at 6:59 AM
  • #27
Your 2.66 is gonna be iffy. I had a 98Z(LS1 6 speed), and that car was a bear to get off the line. It had the 2.66 and with Nittos it was almost always a bog. Best 60 1.91 ran 12.6s, and had almost 350Hp/350lbs at wheels(3500lbs). First gear roll was very nice though. Nice and straight.

My stock motored 92GT(full bolt ons) hit some 1.67s.68s on ET Streets Bias with 2.73s and a D1 5K dump not bogging. First gear math a little worse than yours 2.73x3.35, still in the 9s. Boltons NA 1.94s bog 5K dump. Back end walking.

On a different note, my friend let me drive his 92GT street car NOS(3400lbs all accessories roll cage) with 28x10.5 ET Drags. I got a 1.44 60ft. NOW THAT CAR HITS THE TIRES. Best the car has hit, and I weigh +80lbs. Back end REALLY WALKING.

No doubt those stiff sidewalls will drive better.
 
Reactions: FastDriver

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,100
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Yesterday at 7:31 AM
#28
  • Yesterday at 7:31 AM
  • #28
Those are all great data points. I'll be really interested to see how my dark blue car "Father Time" does off of the line. It already has 28x11Ws IIRC with stiffwalls and tubes on a 15" rim and has a fully adjustable suspension. It has 3.70s and a 2.9x 1st gear. So, the 28" tires make the overall ratio about the same, but it's a 331 turbo and I can run it over 7k on the launch if need be. I'm looking forward to getting to seat time.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
577
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?