oh yeah. Raceweight should be under 3500. Yeah, people pushed me in both direction
Soft sidewall ABSORBS the hard hit of the dumped clutch. Stiff sidewall cant flex-spins. Ive raced both, never could get the stiffs to hook unless you ride the clutch. Thats all I know. More research needed. Soft sidewalls give the most traction, but stiff sidewalls will drive/et better. The better straighter feel is what the stiff sides are ALL about.
How heavy? Less than 4000?
Yeah, race weight should be under 3,500 with me in it.
I get what you’re saying, and that’s exactly what had me going back and forth. Several guys made the same point that the regular sidewall can absorb more of the clutch hit. Mickey Thompson’s own construction guide says: “ST = Suggested for manual transmission (Medium compound – M5)” and “S = Stiff sidewall construction. Recommended for 4 link suspension cars, heavy cars (over 3000lb.), and ‘soft ride’ Rear Engine Dragsters. Can aid in quicker reaction times due to less tire distortion.” Mine is a stick car and over 3,000 lb, so that pushed me toward the stiffwall.
Where I landed is that if I just dump the clutch hard, I’m probably going to blow the tire off either way without a very sorted/tunable suspension. So I’m not really expecting the tire to do all the clutch’s job. I’m expecting to still have to work/slip the clutch some. Since I could see the argument both ways, the tie-breaker for me was the better/straighter high-speed feel and MT’s recommendation.
I noticed that these tires still wrinkle up on at least 1/3 of the sidewall, and I decided to run them tubeless. I'm not expecting a world beater, but if my 1.8x 60' on Nittos turns into 1.6 or better, I'd be very happy.