• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Mustang Tuning / AFR / Timing Help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam95GT
  • Start date Start date Aug 26, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Aug 26, 2010
#1
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #1
Mustang Tuning / AFR / Timing Help!:

Today i got the car actually running right. Chris and i restabed the ditsy so it wasnt hitting the intake and we could move the timing around... We twisted it to advance the timing and the car woke the hell up!!!!!

No here is the thing what should you set the base timing at? i know 10* is stock, do i set it at stock base??

Also we finished the wideband install and started it up again... it was idling at 17-18 AFR and would spike as high as 20.... Where do i want the AFR at idle on a HCI car????

Im waiting to get my quarter horse back from moates so i can tune the car better

Currently its set up with a Pro M maf calibrated for 24lb injectors

But every once in awhile i could hear the intake pop... i know it does need tuning work im just looking at a starting point.

 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 26, 2010
#2
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #2
I don't think it's going to matter much where you set the timing. Most of that will be adjusted through your moates. I would just get it to run as well as you can on base timing. Maybe like 12 degrees is my best guess.

Kurt
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Aug 26, 2010
#3
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #3
revhead347 said:
I don't think it's going to matter much where you set the timing. Most of that will be adjusted through your moates. I would just get it to run as well as you can on base timing. Maybe like 12 degrees is my best guess.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Yea i was going to go 14* base.
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
Aug 26, 2010
#4
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #4
Usually 13-14* as base timing is a good starting point if your going to run premium.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Aug 26, 2010
#5
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #5
Joe 5.0 said:
Usually 13-14* as base timing is a good starting point if your going to run premium.
Click to expand...

Yep looks like thats what im going to go for! thanks!
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Aug 26, 2010
#6
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #6
I don't think it matters too much. But why advance it manually when you can do it thru the QH. I have mine set at 10* then I used the global spark adder to add 2 more, which is the whole way across the rpm/load table. Now I'm going back into the tables and adding 1 until I hear it detonate then take 2 away to be safe.

Mine idles right at 14.7, a little leaner probably wouldn't hurt but it's not like it's going to save gas mileage unless you sit in a lot of traffic. Don't forget a lot of gas has 10% ethanol now which is stoich at 14.1:1. I just changed my tune for E10 fuel and it idles alot better now, only surges on cold start-up until it gets to 160* ECT.

Once you get the QH working and can start playing with it you will have a lot of fun. Takes a bunch of patience but is very rewarding when people ask why I have a laptop in my car. Especially at the track, the carb guys drool when I show them the timing/fuel curves.

I just found a local gas station that has ethanol free gas 93 octane, and it's $0.10 cheaper then all the E10 places 93 octane.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Aug 26, 2010
#7
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #7
bayellowstang said:
I don't think it matters too much. But why advance it manually when you can do it thru the QH. I have mine set at 10* then I used the global spark adder to add 2 more, which is the whole way across the rpm/load table. Now I'm going back into the tables and adding 1 until I hear it detonate then take 2 away to be safe.

Mine idles right at 14.7, a little leaner probably wouldn't hurt but it's not like it's going to save gas mileage unless you sit in a lot of traffic. Don't forget a lot of gas has 10% ethanol now which is stoich at 14.1:1. I just changed my tune for E10 fuel and it idles alot better now, only surges on cold start-up until it gets to 160* ECT.

Once you get the QH working and can start playing with it you will have a lot of fun. Takes a bunch of patience but is very rewarding when people ask why I have a laptop in my car. Especially at the track, the carb guys drool when I show them the timing/fuel curves.

I just found a local gas station that has ethanol free gas 93 octane, and it's $0.10 cheaper then all the E10 places 93 octane.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the heads up... I havent been able to play with the QH enough to find all that... i was just loading stock and already modified tunes to the car. I really need to learn how to bump the timing and change everything... but like i said it idles lean. Could it be all the injector cleaner we dumped in the talk lol


Im decent with computers so i guess we will see how fast i pick this up.
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Aug 27, 2010
#8
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #8
You'll have to fine tune the MAF curve most likely. Especially with that nice CAI setup you have(is that custom).

I'm still twEECing mine, it was pretty good except at idle it was terribly lean. Where did you get your MAF curve from? Did pro-m send you the 9 point and you converted it with BE?
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Aug 27, 2010
#9
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #9
bayellowstang said:
You'll have to fine tune the MAF curve most likely. Especially with that nice CAI setup you have(is that custom).

I'm still twEECing mine, it was pretty good except at idle it was terribly lean. Where did you get your MAF curve from? Did pro-m send you the 9 point and you converted it with BE?
Click to expand...

Intake is 3'' mandrel that i cut.

When i get the QH back im going back to the stock maf. That pro M is calibrated for 24lb injectors... it was running off the stock ECU with the proM today

I dont know crap about tuning maf curves so ill have to learn that


I see that that video was not working!

Here is the link!
http://s28.photobucket.com/albums/c236/blindfoldedhope/?action=view&current=MVI_0360.mp4
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Aug 27, 2010
#10
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #10
It should be fairly easy with a WB. I'm using the keep alive memory (kamrf) which shows up as less then 1 is rich, greater then 1 is lean.

Sounds like it idles pretty smooth. When I first did my motor with stock eec and 30# inj with 80mm for 30# it wouldn't idle for more then 5 seconds. I have the dreaded X cam with 110* lobe separation though.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 27, 2010
#11
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #11
the computer expects it to be at 10. twisting the dizzy to mess with the timing defeats the whole purpose of being able to change the tune by tweaking parameters used by the computer.

set it at 10 and control the timing with the computer. or get a carb.

just my personal opinion.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Aug 27, 2010
#12
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #12
base timing is 10. set it to 10 and make all the other timing changes in your tune. an idle afr of 17 is around 15% lean. add 15% to all the points below 1 volt and that should bring the idle down to around 14.5. just multiply by 1.15 and that will give you your 15%. pretty much the same across the whole curve. figure out what percentage the target afr is lean or rich and then add or subtract that amount.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 27, 2010
#13
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #13
Wait a minute. Did you just say you were removing the Pro-M, and going back to the stock MAF?

Kurt
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Aug 27, 2010
#14
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #14
revhead347 said:
Wait a minute. Did you just say you were removing the Pro-M, and going back to the stock MAF?

Kurt
Click to expand...

Yea i dont feel like dealing with an aftermarket maf... its not like ill outflow the stock
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 27, 2010
#15
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #15
Ah, Hi port heads on a 331cid engine????? That's going to be like a whale breathing through a coffee straw. That stock one flows ok, but it's not going to be enough for that engine.

Kurt
 

castine917

Member
Mar 20, 2009
126
3
19
Wyoming, Mi.
Aug 27, 2010
#16
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #16
i was told by my friend/tuner for my car that he wanted base set at 10 and he would tune from there. stock maf? sounds like the straw analogy may be true in your case. stock is ok for some setups but i think you could use something that flows better.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Aug 27, 2010
#17
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #17
its only a 306
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Aug 27, 2010
#18
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #18
Yeah you will probably clip the stock maf. It's max flow is 900kg, my car hits 1220 kg at 6000rpm. The pro-m 24 maxes at 1247kg so mine would almost max that out.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Aug 27, 2010
#19
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #19
If your wanting to stay with a stock maf I would get a LMAF or even a 4.6 mustang maf as they flow more. FYI I was at around 4.3v at 4-4500 rpm with a 4k valve issue (collapsed lifters). That was with ported gt40 heads on a 306. I picked up a 98gt maf for like $20-30 and an adapter for $40 at the ford dealership (get parts at cost WOOT). I think you need to log your Mafv, rpm, and load and see were your at.

Keep the dizzy at 10* as it is far better to tune it with the QH/tweecer. For one you can tune to have all your timing in by 2500-3k and doing it globally is like buying a barret .50 to go deer hunting...overkill and a waste. For one your EGR will be 4* higher and it hits mid 40's* when at cruise so you just bumped it and it will skew your logs as the eec will not know you bumped it at the dizzy. This "unseen" timing can cause issues if you run into any idle/load/ping issues or simply using logs to tune safely at WOT and everywhere else.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 27, 2010
#20
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #20
I know the stock MAF is like 65mm. But it has that enourmous divide in the middle of it. So it's not the same as 65mm Pro-M MAF.

Kurt
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
89
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
536
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
D
Tune erased/wont start/91 fox body
  • drew123
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
1
Views
103
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
16
Views
580
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 7, 2026
X-cam34
X
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
238
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?