• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

My Mach 1 vs 05 GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter SteedaQ400
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Dec 16, 2006
#21
  • Dec 16, 2006
  • #21
307/307 is the number of the best 05 in my club. with all bolt ons. that dyno was optimistic.
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Dec 17, 2006
#22
  • Dec 17, 2006
  • #22
Between a stock '05 and a stock Mach, the Mach is gonna have a 10RWHP and 10-15RWTQ advantage (on dyno). That eliminates the '05's tune and CAI as moot. Mufflers is nothing, and 3.73's over 3.55's is minimal.
 

SteedaQ400

New Member
Jan 15, 2003
60
0
0
Austin,TX
Dec 17, 2006
#23
  • Dec 17, 2006
  • #23
Forgot to mention it's a 5-spd. I have kuhmo summito 275's in the rear. Well I was talking to him and telling him I was getting opinions on the race. Well I told him that I needed some more mods before I can race you. He said that's cool and well have to try eventually.
 
T

thump_rrr

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
220
0
0
Montreal, Canada
Dec 17, 2006
#24
  • Dec 17, 2006
  • #24
I'll give you my $0.02.

My 05 bone stock with 180 miles on it ran 13.65. Got it Thursday night and ran it Saturday.

I actually did back to back to back testing one day in the fall of 05.
Stock VS. 93 Octane Diablosport Canned tune VS. C&L Street Kit and 93 Octane Diablosport C&L Canned tune.

I did 3 runs with each setup leaving 20 minutes or so between runs. I took the best of the 3 times.
The results were

Stock intake and stock tune 2.094 60ft. 13.757 @ 102.630 mph.
Stock intake and Diablo tune 2.041 60ft. 13.535 @ 104.577 mph.
C&L Intake and Diablo 93 octane tune 1.954 60ft. 13.274 @ 107.453 mph.

Once the testing was complete I bolted on my BFG Drag Radials and ran a 13.05 on the brakes in E.T. Bracket eliminations and still broke out.

The car in the same configuration went on to run 12.95 with the drag radials a few weeks later.

On the second to last day of the season I added a set of Steeda U/D pulleys the car ran 12.82

On the last day of the season I installed my JBA Longtube Headers and Catted H-Pipe and ran a 12.691 @ 109.170 without any tuning.

In the spring with the addition of 4.10's the car ran it's N/A best of 12.461 @ 114.18. It's still sitting at the top of the TMS Timeslip thread for N/A.

The car has no weight reduction and was running on factory wheels and roadrace suspension.

If you're wondering what HP the car made while N/A here is the dyno sheet. Keep in mind it's done on a Mustang Dyno which is on average shows 10% lower numbers than a Dynojet.




Don't look at the mph at our track and compare it to anotherone because we know it's off. For comparisson I'll show you my current best times from my home track and one run at E-Town


The car with the addition of a Saleen S/C and the JDM Stage II upgrade kit (10 psi)
the car ran a best of 11.427 @ 119.92 at Englishtown NJ last month.
The same setup ran 11.441 @ 124.789 at my home track




 

SteedaQ400

New Member
Jan 15, 2003
60
0
0
Austin,TX
Dec 17, 2006
#25
  • Dec 17, 2006
  • #25
Dam bro those are good numbers. I feel sad now.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Dec 17, 2006
#26
  • Dec 17, 2006
  • #26
thump_rrr said:
I'll give you my $0.02.

My 05 bone stock with 180 miles on it ran 13.65. Got it Thursday night and ran it Saturday.

I actually did back to back to back testing one day in the fall of 05.
Stock VS. 93 Octane Diablosport Canned tune VS. C&L Street Kit and 93 Octane Diablosport C&L Canned tune.
Click to expand...

i was going to quote this message that you posted in that older thread on the same topic, you saved me some work.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Dec 17, 2006
#27
  • Dec 17, 2006
  • #27
Hmm, I think the 05 has the advantage. I've seen one with a catback, CAI, and MPH tune put down just under 300rwhp.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
3" Catback for 2004 GT/Mach 1
  • BlackGT85
  • Oct 18, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
706
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2023
BlackGT85
B
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
869
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
F
California, Daly City representing here! Hello!
  • FATTS_DC
  • Feb 9, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
285
The Welcome Wagon Feb 10, 2025
LILCBRA
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?