• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Need Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter streetdemon70
  • Start date Start date Dec 25, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Dec 25, 2005
#1
  • Dec 25, 2005
  • #1
Got a new 302 Shortblock for my car for x mas and am wanting to have a mild street car with around 265-290 hp. What head cam intake combo will be needed to do this. It will have a roller cam in it keep in mind. thanks for the help. its goin in a 70 coupe. with a c4 behind it
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 25, 2005
#2
  • Dec 25, 2005
  • #2
1: heads, world products windsor jr, or afr 185's

2: intake, performer rpm

3: cam, xe262hr comp cam
 
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Dec 26, 2005
#3
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #3
what carb? 600 or 650?
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 26, 2005
#4
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #4
streetdemon70 said:
what carb? 600 or 650?
Click to expand...

I vote for the 600 CFM with vac secondaries. Better to be a little under than over on the carb!

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Dec 26, 2005
#5
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #5
thanks. is there a big difference in vac secondaries versues man secondaries
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 26, 2005
#6
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #6
yes, vacuum secondaries open only when there is enough load on the engine to require extra fuel and air. the mechanical secondaries open when the throttle is pushed hard enough, even at idle. you can also use an air valve secondary carb as well, like the edelbrock, carter afb, or rochester quadrajet. on these type carbs the secondaries open when the throttle is pushed open, but the air valve opens when airflow overcomes spring or weight resistance.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Dec 26, 2005
#7
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #7
rbohm said:
1: heads, world products windsor jr, or afr 185's

2: intake, performer rpm

3: cam, xe262hr comp cam
Click to expand...

Im no expert but do you NEED that good of a head to make 265-290? I will agree they will give you room to grow but I think the HP goal could be had for cheaper.

Tyler
 

65up2d8

Member
Mar 30, 2005
281
0
17
Memphis, TN
Dec 27, 2005
#8
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #8
tylerrocks said:
Im no expert but do you NEED that good of a head to make 265-290? I will agree they will give you room to grow but I think the HP goal could be had for cheaper.

Tyler
Click to expand...

Agreed. The recommendations are overkill, IMO, but some excess is always a good thing so you have room to grow, right? With that being said, look for a set of used World heads or GT40's of one type or the other on Ebay, etc., if you have price limitations that prevent the use of the heads suggested. From what I understand, however, make sure you know about the header fitment issues if you go with GT40 P heads.
 
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Dec 27, 2005
#9
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #9
since it is going to be a roller what do i need to tell people when i order my dizzy so i make sure it has the right gear on it.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Dec 27, 2005
#10
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #10
Steel gear.

Tyler
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 27, 2005
#11
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #11
tylerrocks said:
Im no expert but do you NEED that good of a head to make 265-290? I will agree they will give you room to grow but I think the HP goal could be had for cheaper.

Tyler
Click to expand...

yes you can get ported stock heads that will allow the engine to make the same power, but then you have about the same money in stocks heads as you would the aftermarket heads, and the aftermarket heads have other advantages going for them like;

1: thicker castings

2: more efficient combustion chambers

3: better port design

4: less chance of cracking

the heads that i recommended are perfect for an engine that makes around 300hp if you leave the ports as cast, and do allow for more power in the future. remember that when you are building an engine that you want to most efficiency possible, and the most capability for the money.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Dec 27, 2005
#12
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #12
AFR 185 flow 277 @.600, they hit 200 cfm at .350 lift. According to http://allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/630.shtml 185' are only out flowed by Vic. Jr.,TFS R, Canfield, and Victors. I think your suggested H/C/I combo would produce well over the 1 hp per cu. desired.

The Jan 2006 issue of mustangs and fords has an artical about a roller 289 making 301 hp using stock heads with a little money in them.

AFRs cost $1300

Tyler
 
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Dec 28, 2005
#13
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #13
thanks for all the info guys. I have heard it is hard to get long tubes to fit on a 70 is this true?
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 28, 2005
#14
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #14
Long tubes should not be a problem at all. If you want to spend over $1K on aftermarket heads (and have the room to grow later) consider the AFR-165s. I think they are closer match for your power levels. You can also buy GT40 aluminum heads for very little money since so many guys are replacing them, with the right pistons they work quite well and have the benefits of lighter weight and less detonation.
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 28, 2005
#15
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #15
Yeah, if you want to go aftermarket I think the 165s would be a good choice over the 185s. Then again if you could have your stockers worked for around 500 you could have higher compression as well and still get to your goals cheaper.
 
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Dec 28, 2005
#16
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #16
ok thanks everyone, would there be room to grow with the 165's later on if i decided i wanted more power
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 28, 2005
#17
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #17
I'd guess that the 165s would support 330-350 fwhp in a reliable NA mill with 306 or less cubes.
 
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Dec 31, 2005
#18
  • Dec 31, 2005
  • #18
ok i think i have decided that i want to hit the 300hp mark when my car gets on the dyno. What if anything would yall change from what was originally said so i can hit 300.
 
S

streetdemon70

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
57
0
0
Jan 1, 2006
#19
  • Jan 1, 2006
  • #19
ttt
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Jan 1, 2006
#20
  • Jan 1, 2006
  • #20
If you are on a limited budget and only want 290ish, it sounds like a good time to learn how to port.

Pick up a set of E7s and go to town.

There is plenty of useful information on the web and stock gaskets are CHEAP.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
96
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
9
Will I feel a difference
  • 90Stanger302
  • Mar 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
207
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
Noobz347
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
510
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
New Built 91 Foxbody electrical failure. Need help
  • hassler
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
437
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?