• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Need Intake Manifold and cam?? suggestions

  • Thread starter Thread starter HO5POINTO1990
  • Start date Start date May 11, 2005

HO5POINTO1990

New Member
Aug 12, 2003
125
0
0
San Jose
May 11, 2005
#1
  • May 11, 2005
  • #1
I am looking for an intake manifold that will give me low-end torque to midrange. I have hooker headers, 2.5 off road H, Flows w/turn downs. i am also looking for a cam that will give me more mid to upper hp. I have 3.55's in the rear, and it's a daily driven car. Pretty much i am looking for overall speed. Any suggestions on a good cam for daily driven car IN CALIFORNIA w/smog

btw i do plan on upgrading to a 2.5 catted x pipe for smog when it's due, and new cat back it sux... lots of money wasted on bad modifications that i must now replace again so hopefully someone will give me GOOD insight on a good cam and intake manifold with the intent of leaving the heads stock for at least a year... maybe eventually putting on a 5psi blower in the near future too with all the upgrades that go with that... in tnk fl pump, injectors, another MAF TUBE etc.. thanks
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
May 11, 2005
#2
  • May 11, 2005
  • #2
Ported heads.. the FMS E cam in at 104 ICL ( 6* advanced) TMOSS ported intake and you will be sliding sideways when ever you mash the gas!! and still look totally stock 'cept for the cam idle!!

Just me.....................

Thumper
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
May 11, 2005
#3
  • May 11, 2005
  • #3
For what you want to do, a ported stock lower and a cheap-to-find used E cam (or new) should do it for you. (Edit) A stock Explorer would also work but prob won't give as much low-mid range as the ported stock lower with stock upper. (Edit)
Combine that with professionally ported heads and you've really got a great daily driver street combo.
 

88GT17MA

Member
Nov 1, 2004
289
0
16
May 11, 2005
#4
  • May 11, 2005
  • #4
he says he plans on leaving the heads stock, sound like your wasting money on the wrong mods again.......you should probably overlook your plan instead of putting a bigger cam in a stock engine. Keep the stock cam and invest its cost into port work for your heads. Get your heads ported along with your intake and do a cam later. If money wasnt an option there is a better route, which there probably always is, but it sounds like your trying to keep it fairly mild
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
May 11, 2005
#5
  • May 11, 2005
  • #5
actually... any mod and the 5.0 responds killer!! Heads are not always the key to necksnapping low end!! the E7s and the E cam were made for that combo!! Yes porting the heads are better, or upgrading, but not neccessary like ALL the mag say!! Start out where you can... as you get used to the add'l power or the wallet gets fatter .. then bump up the mods... Cam and intake will add a LOT of power to the 5.0... more WITH ported heads.. but still a lot !!

Just me.......................

Thumper
 

HO5POINTO1990

New Member
Aug 12, 2003
125
0
0
San Jose
May 19, 2005
#6
  • May 19, 2005
  • #6
ok, then what heads should i go with? I am looking for heads that will give me the most power for the dollar and was looking for something street legal. the only ones i can find are the edlebrock heads. any suggestions?
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 19, 2005
#7
  • May 19, 2005
  • #7
HO5POINTO1990 said:
ok, then what heads should i go with? I am looking for heads that will give me the most power for the dollar and was looking for something street legal. the only ones i can find are the edlebrock heads. any suggestions?
Click to expand...

Loko at thumper460's link in his sig. He ports stock heads. Read up. the more you learn about heads and flow and how engines work, the more impressive his head mods become. Tiny valves, small port volumes, high flow numbers....add up to great throttle reponse and more torque and hp.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
May 19, 2005
#8
  • May 19, 2005
  • #8
Couldnt say it better!! LOL

And they work!! bolt on!! and NOTHING special to buy !! rocking!!

Most see an everage of 30-40 RWHP with just the heads alone.. add the E cam and your 50 or MORE at the rear wheels!! And for less than JUST the 'brocks!!

Just me.........................

Thumper
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
882
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
804
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
365
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
732
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?