• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Need some advise from the 2.3 experts..

  • Thread starter Thread starter LAZERREDGT
  • Start date Start date Aug 22, 2007
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
Aug 22, 2007
#1
  • Aug 22, 2007
  • #1
I'm a neighbor from the 5.0 forums as you can see from my sig., my 16 year old son will soon be getting a 92 LX notch. He wants to do a v8 conversion but Iam not too crazy with that idea being he is only 16. I told him if he wanted more power than the stock 105 hp the 2.3 has we could maybe add a turbo setup.

And here is where I need your help, what parts would I need for this turbo project and from what car? This would be a simple with most stock parts still in place, besides the turbo what else would I need.

Thanks for any info/advise

 

sleeper_inc

New Member
May 3, 2007
92
0
0
Regina Beach Sask. Canada
Aug 22, 2007
#2
  • Aug 22, 2007
  • #2
Grab a complete engine out of a merkur, or turbo coupe (SVO if the body can't be saved) and just swap it in. All you need is the VAM, computer and VAM connector and its ready to go
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Aug 23, 2007
#3
  • Aug 23, 2007
  • #3
If you're not too crazy about the V8 swap, I'm surprised you're considering the turbo swap.

Stock hp on them was 150-190, with quite a bit of torque (I think some of the later model engines had 250 ft-lb or so). Plus the turbo tends to be like an on/off switch on some engines, so the power comes on suddenly and if you aren't ready for it, it can do bad things.

Just a friendly FYI...I had an 88 hp '90 LX when I was 17 and I got into plenty of trouble with it
 
1

1986Capri

New Member
Aug 22, 2007
3
0
0
Aug 23, 2007
#4
  • Aug 23, 2007
  • #4
Try and find a 1986-1988 thunderbird turbocoupe, they might have the whole set up there for you. you will need to change the PCM as well and a few other mods.
try and get a junker and take all the parts off it.
 
J

jjs6996

New Member
Aug 27, 2007
0
0
0
CA
Aug 27, 2007
#5
  • Aug 27, 2007
  • #5
sorry new-b

sorry for being off topic but i was wanting to no how relyable an 1988 2.3l is bc i am thinking about buying one for my chick? please and thank you for all and any help. sorry again :OT:
 
B

Biffmeistro

New Member
Feb 16, 2006
87
0
0
Aug 28, 2007
#6
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #6
Reliable? Man, the 2.3 EFI is one of the most reliable engines ford has ever made. You take care of it, and it will likely never die.

The things around the engine may start to go, especially if it's an auto, but the engine itself may never need to be replaced.
 

sleeper_inc

New Member
May 3, 2007
92
0
0
Regina Beach Sask. Canada
Aug 28, 2007
#7
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #7
Biffmeistro said:
Reliable? Man, the 2.3 EFI is one of the most reliable engines ford has ever made. You take care of it, and it will likely never die.

The things around the engine may start to go, especially if it's an auto, but the engine itself may never need to be replaced.
Click to expand...
Like said above, its hard to kill the 2.3. I have overheated mine 2 times in 3 days to 250* It will run fine at that temp. Its very hard to kill these engines if you maintain them
 
J

jjs6996

New Member
Aug 27, 2007
0
0
0
CA
Aug 28, 2007
#8
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #8
thanks guys

thanks a lot guys, i apricate it
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Aug 29, 2007
#9
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #9
Yeah I overheated mine twice in TWO days in St. Louis one year (fan was dead, I didn't know), cracked the head, drove it all weekend and back home. Still drove it for another two or three years afterward and never fixed that head.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 29, 2007
#10
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #10
If you do the turbo setup....make sure you do some kind of boost controller setup and limit the boost to about 10psi...that'll make the car fun but not fast enough for him to really lose it. Like mentioned above, they may not be street demons by today's standards but 190hp in a decently light car is a lot for a new driver, especially if he gets into water or snow. My Merkur likes to break loose even on dry pavement if i get too deep into the boost, and that's with an IRS and stock gears.
 
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
Aug 29, 2007
#11
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #11
Thanks for the info guys! Need to do the basic tuneup first and go from there, also need to replace front bumber cover and left side fender. Then I will move to the turbo stuff in a couple of months, I'll keep checking in these forums to learn more on a turbo setup. Thanks again.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 1, 2007
#12
  • Sep 1, 2007
  • #12
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Like mentioned above, they may not be street demons by today's standards but 190hp in a decently light car is a lot for a new driver,
Click to expand...

The great thing about the 2.3Ts is how much torque they make. It is usually more torque than power up to around the 300hp range. However, tossing a 10psi turbo setup on a N/A 2.3 is not going to make 190hp. If I had to guess, I would say maybe 150. It took 15psi to push the 2.3Ts to 200hp. The non-intercooled 2.3Ts were only rated at 140hp.

Also be careful turning the screws to a N/A 2.3 with boost. The pistons are cast instead of forged like the 2.3T and the compression is up around 9:1 instead of 8:1. They are not forgiving if pinging starts to happen. 10psi with conservative timing and premium gas will be alright.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Sep 2, 2007
#13
  • Sep 2, 2007
  • #13
Yeah i guess i kinda went by what i know of the Merkurs...the '85s were rated at 170hp/195tq, and i'm almost positive i read that by '88-89 they were up to 190hp, which is what i based my number off of. That's with 15psi and no intercooler (no XR4Ti came intercooler in the states).
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 2, 2007
#14
  • Sep 2, 2007
  • #14
The '87-88 Turbo Coupes were rated(conservatively IMO) at 190hp; 15psi and intercooled. I can't speak for the Merks, but I'm 90% sure the '83-86 non intercooled 2.3Ts were claimed at 140hp. The ratings and setups jumped up and down so much between '83 and '89 that it's possible I have my specs miss-quoted.
 

Dr_EluSivE

Founding Member
Apr 24, 2002
2,155
0
56
Central Illinois
Sep 2, 2007
#15
  • Sep 2, 2007
  • #15
I would not Build a 2.3t thinking its safer for a new driver. The boost can come on instantly and can be a little hair raising if you accelerate to hard around a corner and get full boost when you aren't expecting it. They are fast no doubt about it, and they do make excellent tq, not to mention just a few cheap mods and it would easily give your 5.0 a good run. That being said its a good learner car. You Really should swap the whole engine to do it right, turboing the stock engine is not recommended. It is a fairly easy swap, and the engine and electronics are pretty simple so its a good car to learn on and easy to work on. I think he would really enjoy the project, and there really is tons of potential in these little engines. He would have no problems building something to spank his import driving friends.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine 2.3 fox body upgrades from sn95
  • 92ponyboy
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
4
Views
318
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 25, 2026
NXcoupe
N
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
669
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
803
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?