• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Need Some Lowering Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ironwarrior
  • Start date Start date Jun 25, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
M

mikestang2002

New Member
Jan 14, 2008
2
0
0
Montana
Mar 28, 2008
#41
  • Mar 28, 2008
  • #41
I put the pro kit on my 02 Gt Vert, and am totally happy with them. If you WANT to get that low, go with the Sportline. With either kit you wont be dissapointed.
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Mar 28, 2008
#42
  • Mar 28, 2008
  • #42
i'm not going to bother reading all through here, BUT- SPORTLINES ARE THE ONLY SPRINGS TO BUY. Period. i've tried prokit, H&R SS, they all don't look good. better than stock, but did not take the wheel gap away. Inside, i believe that H&R super sport is probably a better quality spring, because of all the ppl who keep telling me that, but it is UGLY. Even Sportlines ARENT low enough, you will have quite more than a 1" wheel gap EVEN with sportlines. ProKits are a joke. Go with sportlines, not because its the best quality, but they are the only ones that look good. H&R look good on pics, but pics lie alot since It's all in the angle pictures are taken. I've seen H&R in person, on my car, my dads car, lots of other friends cars i meet up with on car meets on saturdays, and maybe its because i use to be into imports, but they are not low enough. Looks a little lower than the prokit i guess, but not by much.
Sportlines or nothing. (unless your considering coilover)
 
J

JimC

Member
Dec 1, 2002
170
0
17
Duluth GA
Mar 28, 2008
#43
  • Mar 28, 2008
  • #43
Check out ebay for prices. I found them to be the cheapest for my Tokico's and free S&H.
 

Ironwarrior

Member
Jun 24, 2007
40
0
7
Mar 28, 2008
#44
  • Mar 28, 2008
  • #44
The bottom line is if you want to get rid of the wheel gap by running springs that lower your mustang much more than 1.5 inches you will end up with crappy ride quality. The mustang suspension travel does not permit dropping that low without compromising handling and ride quality. I'm glad I realized that and went with my setup, it handles like it is on rails.

So far I did the following:
Had full length sub frame connectors welded in.
4 bolt mm caster camber plates
Installed a set of the MM Bilstein shocks and struts..
Installed the new urethane isolators
Adjustable MM rear lower control arms

The only thing I am going to do now to improve handling even more is going to go with coil overs which I should have done to begin with. I'm going to do the front first since I don't have to have groves machined into my struts.. This is required for the rear only. This way if I did want to achieve the "looks only" I can drop it down to the ground and still have the adjustability to raise it back to a level that provides the optimal handling and ride quality....
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Mar 29, 2008
#45
  • Mar 29, 2008
  • #45
Jbauer said:
i'm not going to bother reading all through here, BUT- SPORTLINES ARE THE ONLY SPRINGS TO BUY. Period. i've tried prokit, H&R SS, they all don't look good. better than stock, but did not take the wheel gap away. Inside, i believe that H&R super sport is probably a better quality spring, because of all the ppl who keep telling me that, but it is UGLY. Even Sportlines ARENT low enough, you will have quite more than a 1" wheel gap EVEN with sportlines. ProKits are a joke. Go with sportlines, not because its the best quality, but they are the only ones that look good. H&R look good on pics, but pics lie alot since It's all in the angle pictures are taken. I've seen H&R in person, on my car, my dads car, lots of other friends cars i meet up with on car meets on saturdays, and maybe its because i use to be into imports, but they are not low enough. Looks a little lower than the prokit i guess, but not by much.
Sportlines or nothing. (unless your considering coilover)
Click to expand...
If you say so
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Mar 29, 2008
#46
  • Mar 29, 2008
  • #46
Damn right i say so. Sportlines go lower than HR. Thats a fact, and the specs say so. He wants it lower, so he obviously believes lower looks better. I've had experience with them, and they were just slightly lower than the pro kit.. just enough to give it a nicer stance, but still not what i wanted. I think he's going to be as dissapointed as i was. I wish someone bluntly told ME the facts before i spent 500 dollars on springs that suck. Good thing is springs are easy to re sell.
No decent looking wheel will give you your goal of 1" to 1.5" wheel gap on ANY HR spring, or Eibach for that matter, but the sportlines will put you closer. unless you high profile 18s, and a LCA in the rear and x2 ball joint in the front with sportlines all around, you can kiss your 1.5" goal good bye.

This is the best pic i have found of sportlines that show their true look- the picture is taken at level stance, the car is on level ground- no eye tricks. pay attention, not to the car, but if you have a good monitor, take a look, a really good look at the wheel gap in the rear. Then look at the wheel gap in the front. HR super sports will be slightly higher, every 1/10 of an inch counts. It sucks when you buy springs, then look at your car later and your like "crap, i shoulda bought lower springs"
http://members.cox.net/techme/index.htm

The sportlines are also alot more friendly for drag racing. Forget about that feeling you get when the front end of your car lifts up when you launch at the strip- the spring rate 700+ on the HR SS keep you planted- which is nice when road racing, but it is a stiffer spring. Eibach is only a bit stiffer than stock, but you still get some weight transfer.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 29, 2008
#47
  • Mar 29, 2008
  • #47
Jbauer said:
i'm not going to bother reading all through here, BUT- SPORTLINES ARE THE ONLY SPRINGS TO BUY. Period. i've tried prokit, H&R SS, they all don't look good. better than stock, but did not take the wheel gap away. Inside, i believe that H&R super sport is probably a better quality spring, because of all the ppl who keep telling me that, but it is UGLY. Even Sportlines ARENT low enough, you will have quite more than a 1" wheel gap EVEN with sportlines. ProKits are a joke. Go with sportlines, not because its the best quality, but they are the only ones that look good. H&R look good on pics, but pics lie alot since It's all in the angle pictures are taken. I've seen H&R in person, on my car, my dads car, lots of other friends cars i meet up with on car meets on saturdays, and maybe its because i use to be into imports, but they are not low enough. Looks a little lower than the prokit i guess, but not by much.
Sportlines or nothing. (unless your considering coilover)
Click to expand...

Sportlines are Crap!! i took mine off and sold them for $50. and NO they are not better for drag racing. they are stiff as hell and do not transfer weight worth a damn. they also ride like crap and you will hate driving your car on any bumpy road.

H&R makes the best springs out there. i absolutely love my H&R race springs. the sport and super sport springs are good also.

ifyoujust want your car slammed and dont give a damn about the ride get some of the ebay "drop zone" springs. they are suppose to drop 2.5" and areonly $100 for all the cheap skates out there
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
Mar 29, 2008
#48
  • Mar 29, 2008
  • #48
Sprtlines offer BETTER weight transfer than supersports, not good, but better. the specs speak for themselves.
Whatever the case, my car doesn't have anywheels or exterior mods on it except being lowered at this time, but stock for stock, my car vs another car on HR.. the one on sportlines will look better. HR rode harsher than Eibach to me.
Whatever the case, OPs been warned.

Shoulda sold those sportlines to me for 50 bones, argh!
 

Mr Boogeyman

New Member
Apr 22, 2008
51
0
0
Northern California
May 19, 2008
#49
  • May 19, 2008
  • #49
Jbauer said:
Damn right i say so. Sportlines go lower than HR. Thats a fact, and the specs say so. He wants it lower, so he obviously believes lower looks better. I've had experience with them, and they were just slightly lower than the pro kit.. just enough to give it a nicer stance, but still not what i wanted. I think he's going to be as dissapointed as i was. I wish someone bluntly told ME the facts before i spent 500 dollars on springs that suck. Good thing is springs are easy to re sell.
No decent looking wheel will give you your goal of 1" to 1.5" wheel gap on ANY HR spring, or Eibach for that matter, but the sportlines will put you closer. unless you high profile 18s, and a LCA in the rear and x2 ball joint in the front with sportlines all around, you can kiss your 1.5" goal good bye.

This is the best pic i have found of sportlines that show their true look- the picture is taken at level stance, the car is on level ground- no eye tricks. pay attention, not to the car, but if you have a good monitor, take a look, a really good look at the wheel gap in the rear. Then look at the wheel gap in the front. HR super sports will be slightly higher, every 1/10 of an inch counts. It sucks when you buy springs, then look at your car later and your like "crap, i shoulda bought lower springs"
http://members.cox.net/techme/index.htm

The sportlines are also alot more friendly for drag racing. Forget about that feeling you get when the front end of your car lifts up when you launch at the strip- the spring rate 700+ on the HR SS keep you planted- which is nice when road racing, but it is a stiffer spring. Eibach is only a bit stiffer than stock, but you still get some weight transfer.
Click to expand...

Sorry to pull this thread but I will have to agree with this guy. I have experienced with both prokit and sportlines and the car still looks kinda high (although the sportlines look better). I made the error of going by pictures posted by members here but then realized that the pics taking here are usually taken at weird angles as to make the car look good for the camera shot but in person is a different story. See my thread here: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=749795 ..I kept thinking it was my wheels and tires but it wasn't
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
May 19, 2008
#50
  • May 19, 2008
  • #50
if you want a 1/2 inch gap and you've got a new edge, you can forget about 1/2 inch gap in the front with 17s and you sure as hell can forget having anywhere near 1/2 gap in the rear.
Eibach Sportlines FTW. i spent 500 dollars in springs.
Pro kit (Sucks, looks like stock)
HR sport (also sucks)
HR sportline (still not low enough, so IMO, sucked)

Finally finally finally, i got the sportlines...lower than super sports..but i still thought the front sucked... SO- Sportlines with no front isolators, IMO- the only spring combo that doesnt suck, if a low car with 1" or less fender gap is what you want.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
48
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
320
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
580
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?