• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

new cam....new problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter eric n
  • Start date Start date Nov 10, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Nov 13, 2005
#21
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #21
eric n said:
Mine is Blue, Tahitian Pearl Blue to be exact (honda civic color from last year). I didn't take my car to the show, but it was out and about over the weekend. It could very well have been mine that you saw. While not perfect, it's a pretty tight looking ride.
Click to expand...
Im assuming you live off of Mountain Vista????My bro lives off of Starlight Peak and drives a 55' VW pro street oval bug(yellow primer).He makes a point to show me your car every time i go up there,I drove by a couple of weeks ago and it looks the way mine used to.

oh, what lift is the new cam and whit kind of heads are they.I had a comp cam 270 years back it would like to kiss the valves too
 

eric n

Founding Member
Jul 14, 2001
875
2
19
Bakersfield, CA
Nov 13, 2005
#22
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #22
iskwezm said:
Im assuming you live off of Mountain Vista????My bro lives off of Starlight Peak and drives a 55' VW pro street oval bug(yellow primer).He makes a point to show me your car every time i go up there,I drove by a couple of weeks ago and it looks the way mine used to.

oh, what lift is the new cam and whit kind of heads are they.I had a comp cam 270 years back it would like to kiss the valves too
Click to expand...

Well I lived off ALTA VISTA. Don't think there is a mountian vista in B-field (it would be easy to be wrong). I just moved from there to the west side oftown.. So there is a good chance it's my car. Nice to Know it get's noticed. As per the lift, cam card is with the mechanic and I don't remember the specs off the top of my head. Likely cuz I don't understand cams to save my arse. I just called comp cams told them where I was and where I wanted to be and they recommended this based on my engine intake, heads, carb, gearing...... As a note it felt pretty nice until it tanked. I can't wait to take it out and get on it a notch. Hopefully mon or tues... We shall see.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Nov 13, 2005
#23
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #23
D.Hearne said:
With that much dammage, the pump cam should have been in contact when the timing cover was bolted on. Should have leaked oil like crazy too. If not, then I'd suspect the cam retainer wasn't installed. Last thing would be a too thick cam gear. A high volume oilpump wouldn't cause all this damage.
Click to expand...

Well the pump cam was touching the timing cover but not enough for it to be noticeable. I think the timing cover flexed enough to seal but the shavings would have trashed the motor. After this was found, i compared the new cam gear to the stock one and the new gear was indeed thicker. And no a high vol oil pump won't cause this, but i was showing why the mechanic according to another post wouldn't use the compcams timing gear. All the engine shops talked me out of the high vol oil pump and they do wear out distributors and their gears.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Nov 13, 2005
#24
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #24
eric n said:
Well I lived off ALTA VISTA. Don't think there is a mountian vista in B-field (it would be easy to be wrong). I just moved from there to the west side oftown.. So there is a good chance it's my car. Nice to Know it get's noticed. As per the lift, cam card is with the mechanic and I don't remember the specs off the top of my head. Likely cuz I don't understand cams to save my arse. I just called comp cams told them where I was and where I wanted to be and they recommended this based on my engine intake, heads, carb, gearing...... As a note it felt pretty nice until it tanked. I can't wait to take it out and get on it a notch. Hopefully mon or tues... We shall see.
Click to expand...
I didnt know there was so many mustangs there,this blue fastback was by Earl Warren jr high,so guess i got you mistaken with another one

have any pics?
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Nov 14, 2005
#25
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #25
jbuening said:
Wanna know why they didn't want to use the Comp Cam timing set? See pics below





amnit: Yep, thats my timing chain and the true dual roller timing chain from CompCams. Their cam sprocket is thicker than stock ones and you see what happens there. I had to grind my fuel pump eccentric down to get it to work. Good thing i didn't start the engine like that.


Oh and was a High Volume oil pump installed? that will create alot of stress on the dizzy gear and will eat them up in a hurry. Just a thought
Click to expand...


LOL i did that too. hey just use the other dowel pin and a 2 piece fuel pump eccentric. you didn't pull start it did you?
 
J

Jon22

New Member
Jul 1, 2002
25
0
0
Marietta, GA
Nov 14, 2005
#26
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #26
0
 
J

Jon22

New Member
Jul 1, 2002
25
0
0
Marietta, GA
Nov 14, 2005
#27
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #27
I don’t mean to overstep you guys but I have been in the engine business for a while and I do machine work for a race shop. A bad or no retainer plate on the cam caused that timing cover damage. Also to add, high volume oil pumps on the street are a bad choice. I have seen more pans sucked dry and cranks burnt-up with HV pumps than I can count. For a street motor, standard volume is the way to go.

Hope this helps, Jon22
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Nov 14, 2005
#28
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #28
ashford said:
LOL i did that too. hey just use the other dowel pin and a 2 piece fuel pump eccentric. you didn't pull start it did you?
Click to expand...

None of the dowels they supplied were long enough. Had to buy a longer one from ford. I was told by many that the 2 piece eccentric has the same depth as the one piece so i didn't bother. I had to pull the oil pan for something and noticed the shavings at the bottom and some hanging from the timing chain. This was before the motor was in the car. All that damage was from hand cranking the motor over to adjust the valves and such.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Nov 14, 2005
#29
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #29
Jon22 said:
I don’t mean to overstep you guys but I have been in the engine business for a while and I do machine work for a race shop. A bad or no retainer plate on the cam caused that timing cover damage.
Click to expand...

I'm not questioning your expertise, but the overall thickness of the timing gear itself was quite a bit thicker than the stock one which IMO caused the interference. The retainer plate was new and is in place.

Oh and sorry everyone for hijacking this thread. It wasn't my intention
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Nov 14, 2005
#30
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #30
Well, if jbuening can tell us what the cam thrust was, we can decide if the retainer plate was to blame, or not. Too, some cam sprockets require a shim (thrust bearing)to limit cam thrust. If the shim is required, but not used, the cam can walk forward and do the deed on the front cover. IF this is the case, the thicker cam gear may have been okay had the shim been used. If the ship was not required, or was required AND used, than I can begin to think about the cam sproket being the issue.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Nov 14, 2005
#31
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #31
Cam thrust was within specs according to the Tom Monroe manual and the original 1970 Ford manual. Sorry it's been a year and can't remember the exact thrust. Not sure how shimming would work except make the matters worse. Wouldn't the shim place the cam gear closer to the timing cover? Anyways, i followed the following instructions and the cam sprocket had the washer built in so the washer was not used in this case (which would have caused major clearance problems )

http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Instructions/Files/179.pdf#search='cam%20thrust%20ford'

Those instructions don't mention any shims
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Nov 14, 2005
#32
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #32
Here is a page dispelling some of the myths about pumping pans dry and dizzy gear wear. Simple fact is pumps have a bypass at a certain pressure, and 99% of engines don't have passages big enough to pump it dry with a fire hose.

http://www.melling.com/support/bulletins/bulletin-3rd.htm
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Nov 14, 2005
#33
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #33
jbuening said:
None of the dowels they supplied were long enough. Had to buy a longer one from ford. I was told by many that the 2 piece eccentric has the same depth as the one piece so i didn't bother. I had to pull the oil pan for something and noticed the shavings at the bottom and some hanging from the timing chain. This was before the motor was in the car. All that damage was from hand cranking the motor over to adjust the valves and such.
Click to expand...

Correct. Cams usually wont walk that far, or dig that deep with just the retainer missing. That was clearly forced into it. Some Ford timing covers just arent deep enough for a double roller.

If you had started it, it probably would have made some interesting noises, and probably would have leaked.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Nov 14, 2005
#34
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #34
My bad. The thrust bearing keeps the cam from moving toward the rear, not the front. Sorry. I feel like an a$$ ... wait aminute, I am an a$$!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
161
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
810
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 2:39 PM
CAMTWO1070
S
Need help asap
  • shaggyman65
  • Dec 24, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
243
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2025
shaggyman65
S
1990 Mustang with no-start condition - Fixed and how-to
  • TTSaleen
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
108
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2026
TTSaleen
2
02 mustang gt crank no start
  • 2v.cjmullis
  • Jan 28, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
298
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?