• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

New front control arms now ride height problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter indk67k
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2011
I

indk67k

New Member
Jan 3, 2011
7
0
1
Jan 18, 2011
#1
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #1
I just installed m3075a ontrol arms on my fox but now the passenger rear side sits about one inch higher in than the driver side and the front passenger sits about half to 3/4 of an inch in the front.
i checked and the springs and made sure they are installed correctly so im not sure what it could be, im wondering if having the driver side jacked up over night could be effecting its stance? could it just need to sit for a little to settle again? any help would seriously rule.
 
B

BIGDATOWN

Member
Dec 3, 2010
115
0
16
Jan 18, 2011
#2
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #2
Go for a drive for a lil while and then let it sit for a lil while and it will most likely settle
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,275
17,965
224
Massachusetts
Jan 18, 2011
#3
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #3
Did you torque the control arms to the k member when the car was at ride height? Or when the arms were dangling?

Also, having one spring slightly rotated in the spring cup can affect ride height. Rear springs can also affect it, for the same reason
 
Last edited: Nov 15, 2023
I

indk67k

New Member
Jan 3, 2011
7
0
1
Jan 18, 2011
#4
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #4
yeah im guessing it might just have to settle too. well see how it is tomorrow.

Also,
i torqued the control arms down with the control arms themselves jacked up since i couldnt figure out how to get under the car to torque them as it sat.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,359
209
114
Ohio
Jan 18, 2011
#5
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #5
Spring Position and having the car at ride height when torqing the bolts are the main things.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Jan 18, 2011
#6
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • #6
indk67k said:
Also,
i torqued the control arms down with the control arms themselves jacked up since i couldnt figure out how to get under the car to torque them as it sat.
Click to expand...

That should have worked, I did that to my 91 when I did the springs and it sits fine.
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Jan 19, 2011
#7
  • Jan 19, 2011
  • #7
Some things to consider:
1) Springs do not settle! The isolators compress.
2) Did you index the springs, and make sure they stayed in the correct location after you torqued the bolts?
3) Where did you jack up the arms? You need to jack them up at the "wheel" location to get the proper compression/angle on the arm when you torque the bolt. For the FCA, that means jacking up the FCA at the ball joint, and then torquing the bolt for the FCA bushings.

See my web page for some pictures. For front springs, you can see the two index holes in the FCA, and how the spring is between the index holes.
Spring install on a Mustang using the OTC spring tool




BTW: You likely didn't have the arms at the right angle when you torqued the bolts, or the springs where not indexed properly, of the springs moved while the arm was being jacked into position. You can expect ~~1/4" drop from the isolators settling. For most people doing spring installs, the drop from the isolators settling is minimal.



Good Luck!
 

4rdnut

Member
Dec 14, 2010
188
1
16
Jan 20, 2011
#8
  • Jan 20, 2011
  • #8
If you buy fence posts and cut them in 1 foot lengths, you can jack the front up by putting your floor jack under the spring seat cup and jack up one fence post height and put two or three fence post sections under tire, then do other side front, then do the rear the same way, if not high enough, go around again and go two high with fence post sections. This way the car is loaded like sitting on the ground.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jan 20, 2011
#9
  • Jan 20, 2011
  • #9
Car-ramps enable the suspension to realize the static load as well.
 
I

indk67k

New Member
Jan 3, 2011
7
0
1
Jan 20, 2011
#10
  • Jan 20, 2011
  • #10
Yeah im going to re-torque the control arms using some ramps, which should be tomorrow if its warm enough. Im pretty sure the springs are indexed correctly and sit in the control arm cups correctly but i will recheck tomorrow when im re-torquing. ill let you guys know how it goes.
I appreciate all the help guys, thanks a ton.

also, any know the correct ft lb torque for these?
 
I

indk67k

New Member
Jan 3, 2011
7
0
1
Jan 21, 2011
#11
  • Jan 21, 2011
  • #11
So i got under the car on ramps today and loosened the control arm bolts, let it sit for about 15 minutes while i ate lunch and then tightened them down. After that was done i measured and they are perfect now! so torquing them at true ride height fixed it!
Now, i measured the rears and the pass. side sits 1/2 inch taller than driver, i looked at the springs and they are positioned so the pig tail ends are facing me when im looking at them from the drums and facing opposite of each other, is this correct? (does that make sense?)
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jan 22, 2011
#12
  • Jan 22, 2011
  • #12
indk67k said:
Now, i measured the rears and the pass. side sits 1/2 inch taller than driver, i looked at the springs and they are positioned so the pig tail ends are facing me when im looking at them from the drums and facing opposite of each other, is this correct? (does that make sense?)
Click to expand...

The ends of the rear springs should be facing the driver's side (both of them).
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,275
17,965
224
Massachusetts
Jan 22, 2011
#13
  • Jan 22, 2011
  • #13
indk67k said:
Now, i measured the rears and the pass. side sits 1/2 inch taller than driver, i looked at the springs and they are positioned so the pig tail ends are facing me when im looking at them from the drums and facing opposite of each other, is this correct? (does that make sense?)
Click to expand...

Pretty common for drivers side to sit lower.

But both pigtails Should face drivers side
 
B

bruno

Member
Mar 8, 2003
97
7
9
Santa Monica,CA
May 5, 2017
#14
  • May 5, 2017
  • #14
HISSIN50 said:
Car-ramps enable the suspension to realize the static load as well.
Click to expand...

Necro bump. Thought to post here as it's related rather than start a new one.

HISSIN50 - Do you also need to raise the rear of the car to be level? Or can you simply drive up the ramps?

- Bruno
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,275
17,965
224
Massachusetts
May 5, 2017
#15
  • May 5, 2017
  • #15
Ideally, you want the rear level with the front, as having the front lifted would slightly decrease the effect of gravity on the springs due to the direction of gravity being a few degrees off. Does it make a HUGE difference? Probably not? I torqued my front and rear arms with the other side on the pavement.
 
Reactions: bruno
B

bruno

Member
Mar 8, 2003
97
7
9
Santa Monica,CA
May 5, 2017
#16
  • May 5, 2017
  • #16
OK, thanks Mustang5L5.

Mustang5L5 said:
...
But both pigtails Should face drivers side
Click to expand...

All pigtails, L/R Front and L/R Rear, should face driver side. Correct? Making sure this wasn't specific to the rear springs only.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,275
17,965
224
Massachusetts
May 5, 2017
#17
  • May 5, 2017
  • #17
bruno said:
OK, thanks Mustang5L5.



All pigtails, L/R Front and L/R Rear, should face driver side. Correct? Making sure this wasn't specific to the rear springs only.
Click to expand...

Rear springs

Up front, you'll notice two water "weep" holes in the spring perches. You want to position the bottom coil so that the spring end only covers up one of the two holes, not both.
 
Reactions: bruno
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tightening upper control arm bushings at ride height dilemma… need some help
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
General karthief
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
288
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
Suspension Foxbody ride height change after installing new control arms
  • Mhalc1
  • Jan 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 10, 2024
Mhalc1
Wheels-Tires Front fender & liner rub with 245/45/17s
  • FastDriver
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 24, 2024
Warhorse Racing
Height of wheel well opening over the tires, front and rear, and adding clearance for 17x9 wheels up front
  • Blue Thunder
  • May 21, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
8
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 21, 2024
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?