• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

new intake manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter rudy herrera
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2009
R

rudy herrera

Member
Jun 29, 2009
110
0
17
Aug 24, 2009
#1
  • Aug 24, 2009
  • #1
i just bought the bbk ssi 5001 in take manifold with fuel rails and a 70 mm throtle body i purchase this without thinking now im not sure if im going to have to use a cowl hood does any one know if it would clear with the stock hood
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Aug 24, 2009
#2
  • Aug 24, 2009
  • #2
take it back. if you actually get the thing to work the way it is supposed to. you will be in the minority.
 
R

rudy herrera

Member
Jun 29, 2009
110
0
17
Aug 24, 2009
#3
  • Aug 24, 2009
  • #3
why there a pian in tha ass or wat
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Aug 24, 2009
#4
  • Aug 24, 2009
  • #4
i've heard more horror stories about that intake then anything else. fuel rails don't seal, fitment issues, etc.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Aug 24, 2009
#5
  • Aug 24, 2009
  • #5
its just one of those things that did not successfully make the transition from paper to reality.

they sure look cool though
 

67coupe

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
658
402
93
Huntsville, AL
Aug 24, 2009
#6
  • Aug 24, 2009
  • #6
OP, google BBK SSI fuel leak.

stykthyn said:
its just one of those things that did not successfully make the transition from paper to reality.

they sure look cool though
Click to expand...

+1

From working 8 years in manufacturing and reading of all the horror stories here, my money is on a tolerance stack. The dimensions of 4 components determine whether or not there is enough force/contact on the o-rings for a good seal.

1) Lower intake - width between mounting holes for the fuel rails
2) Cross-over tube - length of cross-over tube
3) Depth of hole in each fuel rail
4) Thickness of fuel rails at mounting bracket

Difference between max and min dimensions for these parts might look something like this:

width btw fuel rail mount at max + cross-over tube at min length + holes in fuel rails at max (depth) + width at mounting bracket max = probably 2-4 mm

Easy to see how reports of a cross-over tubes that moves laterally after install, are possible.
 

rbonella

Member
Dec 15, 2008
409
6
19
@ home
Aug 24, 2009
#7
  • Aug 24, 2009
  • #7
Like mentioned above, TAKE IT BACK!!!!! 67coupe brought up a great point, someone posted a thread about a month ago titled "BBK SSI INTAKE WARNING" (i think thats right) it was a hot topic for weeks. They're known to leak fuel with the potential to be VERY DANGEROUS. Just like anything, I'm sure there's plenty of happy customers running that intake with great results. But after reading the warning thread, I would never consider that manifold which is too bad cause it's kind of cool looking and different!
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,673
90
79
Cyprus
Aug 25, 2009
#8
  • Aug 25, 2009
  • #8
stykthyn said:
take it back. if you actually get the thing to work the way it is supposed to. you will be in the minority.
Click to expand...

x2, and get the Edelbrock Performer instead. I know it doesn't look as sexy as the BBK SSI but it performs at least as well and doesn't have any quality issues. I have one and I love it.
 
K

Kevins89notch5.0

Founding Member
Founding Member
Jan 1, 2000
5,864
1
78
Aug 25, 2009
#9
  • Aug 25, 2009
  • #9
I don't care if it made stock 5.0s dyno at 400 at the wheel, it is the most god awful looking intake EVER!
 

Celeb

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 8, 2002
736
13
59
Here and there
Aug 25, 2009
#10
  • Aug 25, 2009
  • #10
Kevins89notch5.0 said:
I don't care if it made stock 5.0s dyno at 400 at the wheel, it is the most god awful looking intake EVER!
Click to expand...

+1 even in the unlikely event you're somehow able to keep it from leaking fuel, it redefines ugly
 
R

rudy herrera

Member
Jun 29, 2009
110
0
17
Aug 26, 2009
#11
  • Aug 26, 2009
  • #11
thanks for the for the help this thing is going back
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine New factory manifold no start
  • Fishnchips
  • Oct 15, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
372
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Oct 22, 2026
DadLife0724
8
Fox Mass Air Flow 42lb injectors
  • 89wreck
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
Scrapla347
Someone help me understand this, Intake opening to throttle body opening
  • from6to8
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2025
from6to8
SOLD Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
387
Engine and Power Adder Aug 19, 2026
Habu135
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?