• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Personal Best!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guero
  • Start date Start date Apr 14, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Apr 14, 2007
#1
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #1
I ran a 13.79 at 102!!! Pretty quick considering I still need a good tune!!!!
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Apr 14, 2007
#2
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #2
Man, what did you do, spin for half the track? lol...
I ran a 12.8 @ 104 in my old Fox (90 GT), so you definitely have more ET in that thing. What was your 60' time? Doesn't sound like you got a good launch to only run a 13.79, but the MPH is there for sure.
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Apr 14, 2007
#3
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #3
Like a 2.25, i think its my tuning. Im hoping to trap in the 108
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Apr 14, 2007
#4
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #4
I dont think its so much your tuning as it is your driving. Im not saying you suck or anything cause trust me and all the other members on here when we say it takes a **** load of practice. With practice, you should be mid-high 12's.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Apr 14, 2007
#5
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #5
whats you best mph? you should be going faster.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 14, 2007
#6
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #6
Good for you Mr. G

You're fine for now

You just need to go the the strip more and try different things to see
what your Stang likes and doesn't like

You will just naturally start to see things you can do to optimize your
sixty foot, shift points and all the other little tricks you can do that
makes the et fall and mph rise

Have Fun
and
Try to not break anything :Word:

Grady
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Apr 14, 2007
#7
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #7
Yes my MPH says it my tuning(According to me ). My best trap was 103 MPH. Like I said with tuning I should be trapping in the 108 mph. Im pretty good at slamming the gears, take of not so good, but either way my MPH should be higher even if i dont get out the hole good. I know I got low 13's the way it sit with some Drag radials
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 14, 2007
#8
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #8
I understand and agree!

Sure ... you can find some more gain in tuning and maybe other small things
I don't disagree with you and the others at all

I just didn't wanna start off with a focus of Pee Peeing in your Cheerios
or Raining all over your Parade

You Know ... The glass is half full kinda thing

but

I really do think you can find a good bit more gain just as it sits now
with more seat time

btw ... what part in your tune do you think needs the most help

O Yeah ... You are so right ... Nittos would help where it really counts

Grady
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Apr 14, 2007
#9
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #9
Yeah I do got more seat time left. But I dont see my MPH getting any better. Have you seen my A/F thats what i need to fix which is the MAF Curves fault. It goes from a low 10 to a high 12 to low 13 in a wave pattern
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Apr 14, 2007
#10
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #10
what mods you got? H/C/I?
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Apr 14, 2007
#11
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #11
Read my sig I just updated it
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Apr 14, 2007
#12
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #12
did you spray those runs?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 14, 2007
#13
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #13
IIRC ... You are using a Fox pcm

If so ... I'd not comment on WOT tuning methods
but
It would seem you need more in some places and less in others

Maybe you could get Jason to lend a helping hand as he be a Fox kinda guy

I guess you would wanna be fatter than normal due to the juice

Grady
 
9

95Mustang302

Member
Mar 30, 2005
302
0
16
Apr 14, 2007
#14
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #14
i REALLY hope you didn't spray especially with those times. YOu should EASILY be able to get 12's with the car n/a, and with the juice low 12's or high 11's
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Apr 14, 2007
#15
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #15
thats what I was thinking, if you sprayed somethings waaaay off
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Apr 14, 2007
#16
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #16
No Im not spraying till I really tune. And Im runnig the Tweecer with a the CBAZA
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Apr 14, 2007
#17
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #17
You should definitely be in the mid-high 12 second zone with your mods. Get yourself some traction and I bet you'll see it before you tune. Afterwards, plus the nitrous, and I wouldn't be surprised by an 11.8ish second run.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 14, 2007
#18
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #18
Guero said:
No Im not spraying till I really tune. And Im runnig the Tweecer with a the CBAZA
Click to expand...

I'll post up some stuff tomorrow you can try with the tune.

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 14, 2007
#19
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #19
60 ft down to 1.8 not even 1.65 would be 13.39. Good tune should give you another 20rwhp which takes you to aut 12.9.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 15, 2007
#20
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #20
Guero said:
Have you seen my A/F thats what i need to fix which is the MAF Curves fault. It goes from a low 10 to a high 12 to low 13 in a wave pattern
Click to expand...

Here is some basic stuff about working with WOT Tuning.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=686340&highlight=fuel+table

It is centered around a NA application and involves working with
fuel table
maf curve
wide band
and
IIRC ... the high speed fuel enrichment function on the j4j1 file

Look at the thread for info AND a link in that thread for yet more info

This stuff is also on my site and may be given with more detail

anyway ... see if it helps you

Grady
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
98
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
815
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 2:39 PM
CAMTWO1070
H
Best tire size for 91 Fox 18x9 wheels. On coilovers
  • hassler
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
376
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
KRUISR
K
86 GT Water Pump
  • Kade5114
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
77
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
nickyb
I
Removing NX NOS kit?
  • ironhorsewayne
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
37
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 8, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?