• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

New TFS intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattstang04
  • Start date Start date Nov 20, 2012

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Nov 20, 2012
#1
  • Nov 20, 2012
  • #1
The new MM&FF magazine is out. Theres an article about a new TFS Streetburner intake for 2V. The article shows good numbers on a fairly hardcore built motor. Theyre marketing it as a more streetable intake as opposed to the Trackheat which they claim is for more of an all out race intake. It looks identicle to the Trackheat to me. Anybody heard anything more about it?
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Nov 20, 2012
#2
  • Nov 20, 2012
  • #2
Haven't heard of it. I think Edelbrock will rule the 2v intake scene in terms of performance gains per dollar. Logan is a serious intake too, but serious $.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Nov 21, 2012
#3
  • Nov 21, 2012
  • #3
Youre probably right. The new TFS is already on Summits site. Not a cheap piece either. Costs pretty much the same as the original Track Heat intake. Of course, no magazine is going to test it on a bone stock 2v. The article aims to sell to the lightly modded or stock crowd but they test the thing on a built motor, full exhaust and like 15 psi boost. Not exactly apples to apples. I know thats not a new tactic for selling products but come on, really.
 

Night Shifter

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2005
1,710
27
59
Daytona
Nov 21, 2012
#4
  • Nov 21, 2012
  • #4
The streetburner intak has a removable plenum so that you can either use the gt style tb and cai or swap to the bullit style like the last intake came...other than that, i see no other differences
 

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Dec 18, 2012
#5
  • Dec 18, 2012
  • #5
I HATE the fact that they didn't do a side by side comparison with the Track Heat. I mean come on, ANOTHER comparo against the stock 2V IM??!! Ok we get it, the stock intake sucks. Why couldn't they do a real comparison? Or even a comparison on a bone stock engine? They do it for the S197 and the Coyote all the time. Why not for us 2V guys?!
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Dec 18, 2012
#6
  • Dec 18, 2012
  • #6
Stay away. Real world dyno in the following thread:

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/99-04/255526-we-need-guinea-pig-2.html

We were originally 284hp and 302 tq with the pi, and streetburner, at BEST, after a cooldown was 287hp and 279 tq. The 287 didnt occur until about 5k. Below that, there was an average of 10 hp less and 20ftlb less in the lower rpm... Which explains the slower e/t from 12.69 to 12.98 at the track.

 
D

Deleted member 38176

Dec 18, 2012
#7
  • Dec 18, 2012
  • #7
007 said:
Stay away. Real world dyno in the following thread:

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/99-04/255526-we-need-guinea-pig-2.html

We were originally 284hp and 302 tq with the pi, and streetburner, at BEST, after a cooldown was 287hp and 279 tq. The 287 didnt occur until about 5k. Below that, there was an average of 10 hp less and 20ftlb less in the lower rpm... Which explains the slower e/t from 12.69 to 12.98 at the track.
Click to expand...

Yikes!
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Dec 18, 2012
#8
  • Dec 18, 2012
  • #8
Thats a good thread. Now I'm curious what it would do on a mild blower car like mine. Probably worth the money to improve my exhaust before triffling with that intake. If it weren't so expensive, maybe I'd consider it.
 

Three50won

10 Year Member
Jul 11, 2010
1,135
64
69
Dec 18, 2012
#9
  • Dec 18, 2012
  • #9
So that's why they used a car with 18 lbs of boost. You know, I think MM&FF has kinda lost touch...
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Dec 19, 2012
#10
  • Dec 19, 2012
  • #10
Three50won said:
So that's why they used a car with 18 lbs of boost. You know, I think MM&FF has kinda lost touch...
Click to expand...

Yeah, just slightly. I have felt that way for a while, I guess they must assume that since they can afford $5000 to put a blower on and all the cars they pic to feature have owners that can also afford it, well, everybody can!
 

mustangman9812

10 Year Member
Jan 14, 2004
661
6
49
Mars Hill, NC
Dec 19, 2012
#11
  • Dec 19, 2012
  • #11
95.0Stang said:
Yeah, just slightly. I have felt that way for a while, I guess they must assume that since they can afford $5000 to put a blower on and all the cars they pic to feature have owners that can also afford it, well, everybody can!
Click to expand...

Agree
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
440
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?