New Trick Flow Manifold Installed

DemonGT

Founding Member

May 24, 2002

871

51

49

Sparta,WI

Dec 10, 2003

#21

• Dec 10, 2003

• #21

thats odd..they actually make a different one for 351W?? mabe they just list it and theres nothing different?? i didnt know you could get them black? kinda wanna see a black one....if you buy the "kit" you get the R lower right?

anyone know how much the upper and lower is..and how much just the upper is?

to bad they didnt have that intake out earlyer this summer..i would of got it for my 410W..im waiting for numbers....i really dont wanna remove the intake i have

i just like Rick said...i thought the same..way to much intake for the combo..but i figured "hey..if he wants to try it out he can" see what happens, never hurt to try...

so is this intake ment to be more of a long runner or short runner intake?

 

Jerry Leaming

Member

Nov 2, 2003

477

2

18

Olympia Wa

Dec 10, 2003

#22

• Dec 10, 2003

• #22

Is the elbow you used is a stock trick flow?
The reason I ask is my edelbrock unit seems to be a lot smaller (diameter) then that unit.
Does it have a 75mm opening or is it more like 90mm?

 

DemonGT

Founding Member

May 24, 2002

871

51

49

Sparta,WI

Dec 10, 2003

#23

• Dec 10, 2003

• #23

dose the TFS R lower intake use a 1250 or 1262 gasket?

 

BlownStangGT

REPEAT

Founding Member

Jan 22, 2002

3,860

6

58

Lancaster, PA

Dec 10, 2003

#24

• Dec 10, 2003

• #24

Rick 91GT said:

Looks cool, but I think that is way too much manifold for that combo...

Click to expand...

I think I have to agree with rick on this one...that seems a little redicoiouls...I bet that car will be a dog...unless you are adding alot more to it that is not picutred

 

Black331Stang

Active Member

Apr 29, 2003

1,485

0

36

Long Island, NY

Dec 10, 2003

#25

• Dec 10, 2003

• #25

yeha and 1 ugly ass intake

 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master

Nov 29, 1999

9,692

95

99

PA

Dec 10, 2003

#26

• Dec 10, 2003

• #26

DemonGT said:

dose the TFS R lower intake use a 1250 or 1262 gasket?

Click to expand...

1262 as far as I know...

 

Jerry Leaming

Member

Nov 2, 2003

477

2

18

Olympia Wa

Dec 10, 2003

#27

• Dec 10, 2003

• #27

1250
mine is ported to a 1262 thou

 

NoSloCoupes

"I would do anything for a FREE muffler"

Founding Member

Mar 4, 2000

2,705

2

58

Clinton,IL

Dec 10, 2003

#28

• Dec 10, 2003

• #28

Why are you running this intake with stg 1 cam and out of the box tw's??? Looks to "soft" to me...to many rounded edges. A box upper should be, well... a box. The prototype looked way better.

 

NoSloCoupes

"I would do anything for a FREE muffler"

Founding Member

Mar 4, 2000

2,705

2

58

Clinton,IL

Dec 10, 2003

#29

• Dec 10, 2003

• #29

Is it just suppose to be a "WOW" piece do you have plans for down the road? Right now, you're nowhere near having enough upper rpms to utilize the benifits of this intake.

 

Jerry Leaming

Member

Nov 2, 2003

477

2

18

Olympia Wa

Dec 10, 2003

#30

• Dec 10, 2003

• #30

Smitty77 where did you get your intake from?
Summit told me two weeks before it ships, is this the same deal with your order?

 

S

smitty77

New Member

Dec 9, 2003

10

0

0

Dec 10, 2003

#31

• Dec 10, 2003

• #31

Basically this intake was given to me by trickflow for a fittment evaluation, and to see how it would perform on something it wasn't designed for. Surprisingly it dosen't lag like you think it would. Numbers will be posted on corral.


-Turbosn95
fitting is on the bottom-middle of the drivers rail, between injectors.

-Jerry
I think TFS & AFM are taking orders now.

 

perkys stang

New Member

Jan 1, 2000

7,132

0

0

PA

Dec 10, 2003

#32

• Dec 10, 2003

• #32

This is starting to look more like SPAM.... 7 post and all about your free intake... Sure you don't work for TFS/Summit?

 

speedracer238

New Member

Sep 18, 2003

141

0

0

Clawson, MI

Dec 10, 2003

#33

• Dec 10, 2003

• #33

perkys stang said:

This is starting to look more like SPAM.... 7 post and all about your free intake... Sure you don't work for TFS/Summit?

Click to expand...

I may have to agree with Perkys

 

BlownStangGT

REPEAT

Founding Member

Jan 22, 2002

3,860

6

58

Lancaster, PA

Dec 10, 2003

#34

• Dec 10, 2003

• #34

perkys stang said:

This is starting to look more like SPAM.... 7 post and all about your free intake... Sure you don't work for TFS/Summit?

Click to expand...

I agree...perk..lay the smack down

 

DemonGT

Founding Member

May 24, 2002

871

51

49

Sparta,WI

Dec 10, 2003

#35

• Dec 10, 2003

• #35

spam?? he posted cause he thought ppl would be interested in the intake?

i dont think its ugly...it shouldnt be square...having it rounded should help with clearence of a hood ect.

 

Jerry Leaming

Member

Nov 2, 2003

477

2

18

Olympia Wa

Dec 10, 2003

#36

• Dec 10, 2003

• #36

Smitty77

Is there enough material in the bottom half and in the adapter plate to lose 1" of height? I was thinking maybe cut the adapter plate in half and milling about 1/2" off the mating surface. I'm guessing that should give me what I need for clearance...
The reason I ask is the manifold at 7.5" high will not clear my hood...
I have a 2" svo cobra r hood the one with the small scoop on top of the cowl.
I realize I will need to get it machined down and get the bolt holes retaped and find new bolts. But if you look at the alternative of $700 reichard intake a little extra effort will be worth my time.
What do you think?

 

L

loboboy

Dec 11, 2003

#37

• Dec 11, 2003

• #37

this is the exact intake neded for a high boost application. At least this is what is recommended for the pro-turbo kits. They recommend a box intake.
Who cares where he got it you all are just jealous cause you don't have one, leave him be. If he works for TFS so be it. If you want free parts for fitment then go get a job with a manufacturer that makes the parts you want, just shut up about where he got it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

ponyboy19

Founding Member

May 24, 2000

1,640

0

36

Dec 11, 2003

#38

• Dec 11, 2003

• #38

lets see your exact combination, exhaust, pullies, timing, everything, then lets see your before dyno graph with what ever intake you were using, I assume it was an aftermarket, then lets see the the dyno of the TFS box intake.. I agree looks like way to much intake but lets see the before and after graphs and here the in's and out's of your combination and see what we are comparing it too.

 

DemonGT

Founding Member

May 24, 2002

871

51

49

Sparta,WI

Dec 11, 2003

#39

• Dec 11, 2003

• #39

im running the victor 5.8 on my motor now...wonder how this intake would compare...RPM range ect., dont know if it would be worth the money to swap intakes..be better probubly to just have the lower port matched....

 

Jerry Leaming

Member

Nov 2, 2003

477

2

18

Olympia Wa

Dec 11, 2003

#40

• Dec 11, 2003

• #40

Anybody seen any other specs on the intake?
Dimensions would great or even some straight on shots all of the pics have been a some sort of angle. This makes it had to get a idea about the over all mass of the unit.