• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

NikwoaC's "Commitment Issues" Engine Build

  • Thread starter Thread starter NIKwoaC
  • Start date Start date Mar 12, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • 42
Next
First Prev 11 of 42 Next Last
F

FoxGT87

5 Year Member
Aug 1, 2009
1,518
8
83
St.pete FL
Apr 23, 2011
#201
  • Apr 23, 2011
  • #201
good stuff Nik, cute knife. sucks about your cam and it is also some BS that they took the privilege to flow your heads with out consent. that would piss me off.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,125
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Apr 23, 2011
#202
  • Apr 23, 2011
  • #202
Honestly, I wish my head guy would have flowed mine for me. Would be nice to have proof of the work done. $50 is a little steep for it, but you wont miss the money later anyway.
 

smokin joe

Founding Member
Sep 30, 2000
746
45
49
Dallas,TX
Apr 23, 2011
#203
  • Apr 23, 2011
  • #203
I think that the hole for your throttle body can swallow your arm is impressive. Doesn't matter what color your exacto knife is as long as it works.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,068
2,671
224
Vass, NC
Apr 24, 2011
#204
  • Apr 24, 2011
  • #204
Those are impressive flow numbers, Nik. I'd let the wait go, in all honesty. That seems to be the status quo for big name companies. HP Performance promised me a turbo kit in 2 months. I got it 6 months later. Fortunately, I knew what I was getting into before I started. I ordered from them because I liked their kits and I was deployed for a year. So the timeframe didn't bother me.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 24, 2011
#205
  • Apr 24, 2011
  • #205
FoxGT87 said:
good stuff Nik, cute knife. sucks about your cam and it is also some BS that they took the privilege to flow your heads with out consent. that would piss me off.
Click to expand...

Meh, I wouldn't have flinched if the parts came in on time, but of course, now I'm over scrutinizing everything, haha. I guess it's nice to have the numbers, but at this point it's really just a conversation piece. Not like you can't go to Trick Flow's website and look them up. This sheet does seem to show that my heads flowed a handful more CFM than what the heads are advertised to do. Not sure if that's just regular fluctuation, or if my heads have a different valve job or what. Could also be that the regular 205s have a 65cc chamber, and mine were milled to 61. Dunno.

I may give him a call this week and try to get more specifics about the flow job. Honestly though, I'm getting tired of calling them, haha. It got to a point where I was constantly calling to ask where my parts were, so I'm sure he's tired of hearing from me, too.

FastDriver said:
Those are impressive flow numbers, Nik. I'd let the wait go, in all honesty. That seems to be the status quo for big name companies. HP Performance promised me a turbo kit in 2 months. I got it 6 months later. Fortunately, I knew what I was getting into before I started. I ordered from them because I liked their kits and I was deployed for a year. So the timeframe didn't bother me.
Click to expand...

Yea, I'm trying to look past it, so as not to ruin my excitement to get the engine back together. The car has just been sitting on jackstands for a while now, and I've already missed a few good weather driving days. Honestly, it's partially my fault for not starting this project earlier in the winter. That or, I should have maybe looked into finding a second 302 to hack into while I drove the car. Either way, I probably should have accounted for delays, and I just didn't do that.

Oh well. The cam will be here tomorrow or Tuesday, then I have my work cut out for me. It's about time to put this bitch back together.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Apr 25, 2011
#206
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #206
Is there any reason you didnt just order the heads direct from summit? I know its a little late now, but they would have been on your doorstep in 3 days
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 25, 2011
#207
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #207
90lxcoupe said:
Is there any reason you didnt just order the heads direct from summit? I know its a little late now, but they would have been on your doorstep in 3 days
Click to expand...

A few reasons, actually, but believe me, I thought about going through Summit. I love Summit!

1. I wanted/needed the heads milled to reduce the chamber size to get any compression on my 302. The OTS 205s come with 65cc chambers, which put me around 9:1, and I wanted high 9s. With the 61cc chambers, I'm around 9.8:1. I'm not sure, but I don't think you can get Summit to mill heads.

2. The heads from TEA came with better springs than the OTS 205s from Summit (or so I'm told). The TEA heads also have titanium retainers- the OTS ones you get from Summit have steel. That's worth a few more RPM and valvetrain stability on the top end.

3. I wanted a one-stop-shop for my whole top end to reduce the guesswork on my end. I wanted to be able to put this thing together and not worry about running into problems because my intake didn't sit right on the heads, or the cam didn't work with the springs, etc. You can buy all these parts from Summit, but Summit isn't going to make sure they'll all work together for you.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Apr 25, 2011
#208
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #208
The retainers is a good selling point. Just be sure to keep an eye on the Ti retainers every couple seasons, they do have a shelf life and the springs will wear grooves into them. I put them on my car last year and there was much more wear than i expected in the short time i ran them when my car left the body shop. I actually went with tool steel retainers with the new cam setup and will see how they work out at 7500rpms. The reason i bought those was they were only like $140 and they are very close in weight to the titanium retainers.

Just sucks you had to wait so long, i would definitly bitch to TEA, and charging you to flow the heads seems bogus to me, it should say that on the website when they quote the price if thats the case. I called them about porting my lower and they never got back to me... luckily the ports matched almost on the money when we were assembling my motor
 

5LiterWes

Member
May 7, 2002
176
15
19
Milwaukee
Apr 25, 2011
#209
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #209
Nice pics. Kind of sucks that TEA is dicking you around. If a company commits to a 2 week window they should honor their commitment IMHO. 5 weeks is not even close. Our power as a community is to not accept crap service like that.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 25, 2011
#210
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #210
90lxcoupe said:
The retainers is a good selling point. Just be sure to keep an eye on the Ti retainers every couple seasons, they do have a shelf life and the springs will wear grooves into them. I put them on my car last year and there was much more wear than i expected in the short time i ran them when my car left the body shop. I actually went with tool steel retainers with the new cam setup and will see how they work out at 7500rpms. The reason i bought those was they were only like $140 and they are very close in weight to the titanium retainers.

Just sucks you had to wait so long, i would definitly bitch to TEA, and charging you to flow the heads seems bogus to me, it should say that on the website when they quote the price if thats the case. I called them about porting my lower and they never got back to me... luckily the ports matched almost on the money when we were assembling my motor
Click to expand...

Well, crap. I had no idea ti had a short lifespan. Meh, whatevs. We'll see what they look like next winter and go from there.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Apr 25, 2011
#211
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #211
NikwoaC said:
Well, crap. I had no idea ti had a short lifespan. Meh, whatevs. We'll see what they look like next winter and go from there.
Click to expand...

I think you will be ok, I saw a set at the machine shop that had been used for a couple seasons on a road race 302 that revved to 8k rpm's and they had grooves worn into them from the springs, but my engine guy said if i wanted to i could use them on my motor(they fit my springs perfect). I didnt feel 100% comfortable about it though. It was one of those things where they would have probably never failed on my motor, but i didnt want to chance it. So we just had a set of tool steel ones ordered with the same specs as those.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Apr 25, 2011
#212
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #212
NikwoaC said:
Time for a little update. The parts came in Thursday afternoon.

Well, most of the parts.

I'm not going to say a lot about it, because I'm trying not to dwell on it, but as you guys know, I ordered the parts 5 weeks ago. I was told 2 weeks. To clarify, the heads and intake came in 3 weeks late. The cam, the ONE thing I need to actually make some progress on assembling the engine, is not here yet. Supposed to come in Monday or Tuesday. I'm a little frustrated.

That's been my experience thus far with T.E.A. I can't say anything yet about the quality of their stuff, obviously, as I haven't put it together and ran it. It looks good.

Anyway, below are some pics of the intake and heads. Just as a reminder, the intake is a TFS-R 90mm, CNC port matched to the heads, and the heads are TFS Twisted Wedge CNC 205s, milled to 61cc chambers. Oh, by the way, they flowed the heads (and charged me $50 for it, not sure I asked for that...). Here are the numbers:

Lift - Intake - Exhaust
.100 - 70.70 - 56.90
.200 - 148.9 - 106.8
.300 - 224.4 - 153.0
.400 - 274.0 - 195.8
.500 - 305.7 - 220.2
.550 - 314.7 - 230.8
.600 - 319.3 - 235.8

It doesn't say on the sheet, but I'm assuming that is on a 4" or a 4.030" bore. I have no idea what kind of pipe they ran on the exhaust.

Pics:




Tried to get a shot where you can clearly see the difference in chambers. Notice the shrouding on the stock valves, and also the rotation of the valves on the TWs versus the inline valves on the stock heads.

Stock header gaskets were way too small for the TW exhaust ports. Go figure! So, I'm going to try to trim them up a bit. You guys like my pink Exacto knife?
Click to expand...

You has a small arm
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 25, 2011
#213
  • Apr 25, 2011
  • #213
fiveohwblow said:
You has a small arm
Click to expand...

That's not what your mom said.

Wait, what?
 
M

mustangman289hp

Member
Jul 27, 2010
32
0
6
The Woodlands, TX
Apr 26, 2011
#214
  • Apr 26, 2011
  • #214
This is an awesome build im ready to do the same ... how much do you think it will all cost said and done?
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Apr 26, 2011
#215
  • Apr 26, 2011
  • #215
well we sold our TFS R intake, and going single plane with a GM ls TB like on my 98gt, AND a custom cam.

nik: you will lose a lifter or 2 before you mess up the springs or retainers. if you haven't looked into it yet, I would DEFINITELY get some good ones. We killed i think 3 last year, the stock ones just cant take much more than 7k. It didn't destroy anything, they just come apart and would smoke a pushrod, but it gets old changing them.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 27, 2011
#216
  • Apr 27, 2011
  • #216
mustangman289hp said:
This is an awesome build im ready to do the same ... how much do you think it will all cost said and done?
Click to expand...

Thanks, man! I'm trying not to think too much about cost, because I blew the budget a long time ago, haha! The bill from TEA alone was $3700.

Plus machine work on the short block.
Plus rebuild parts for the short block.
Plus fuel system stuff.
Plus a new clutch.



I'm just really glad the wife has been cool with everything so far!

Mr. Rustypwnz said:
well we sold our TFS R intake, and going single plane with a GM ls TB like on my 98gt, AND a custom cam.

nik: you will lose a lifter or 2 before you mess up the springs or retainers. if you haven't looked into it yet, I would DEFINITELY get some good ones. We killed i think 3 last year, the stock ones just cant take much more than 7k. It didn't destroy anything, they just come apart and would smoke a pushrod, but it gets old changing them.
Click to expand...

A single plane with an elbow and a big TB is the way to go! I briefly considered that for my car, but I don't know if I need it for the RPMs I'm planning to run. You can definitely flow a lot of wind with a setup like that.

Do you know what specs for the cam yet?

On the lifter thing, I plan on keeping this engine under 6500-6700rpm to avoid grenading the stock bottom end, so hopefully the FRPP lifters will be OK. When I was ironing out the details with Mike at TEA, I originally thought I wanted to go with the upgraded Comp Cams lifters, but he seemed to think it was a waste of money for what I was trying to do. And it makes sense really, these stock class racers are somehow getting OE lifters to survive 8000rpm blasts, so hopefully I can get them to live with the occasional 6500rpm shift! I imagine if you were going to do 7000 on a regular basis though, aftermarket lifters like the Comp units would be a good idea.

Hey, BTW, my cam came in!!! Here are the specs:

----------------Intake----Exhaust
Duration @ .006:----265*-----276*
Duration @ .050:----215*-----224*
Lobe lift:----------.355"-----.354"
Lift W/1.6 rocker:---.568"-----.566"

Lobe separation: 112*


Notice that the duration numbers for both the intake and exhaust are shorter than a TFS stage 1 cam, but have WAY more lift. The cam is similar to a Comp Xtreme Energy 266 grind, for anybody familiar with the XE cams, but mine has more lift.

Like I said before, the goal of the cam is to tame those cylinder heads and intake and make them usable at low rpm on my little 302, but still have enough lift to take advantage of the wind that those parts can flow, so hopefully it will still want to rev quite a bit. I guess we'll see!

I'll be running a 1.6 rocker for right now, Mike suggested I do that to save spring life, and besides, it's not like I NEED any more air flow with those heads! In the future, if I ever wanted to run 1.7s, that's ~.604" intake and .602" exhaust lift, for those not wanting to do the math.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Apr 27, 2011
#217
  • Apr 27, 2011
  • #217
Renegade cars have been spinning stock lifters past 8k for years, I plan on going 7500 on stock lifters and when my cam was ground i was told the spring pressures need to be right but it has more to do with the ramp rates on the cam that helps the stock lifter survive
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Apr 27, 2011
#218
  • Apr 27, 2011
  • #218
Can't wait to see this bitch put back together!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 27, 2011
#219
  • Apr 27, 2011
  • #219
90lxcoupe said:
Renegade cars have been spinning stock lifters past 8k for years, I plan on going 7500 on stock lifters and when my cam was ground i was told the spring pressures need to be right but it has more to do with the ramp rates on the cam that helps the stock lifter survive
Click to expand...

Yep, it's not just RPMs alone that kill lifters. Ramp rate and spring pressure also play a big part.

SteedaGT9150 said:
Can't wait to see this bitch put back together!
Click to expand...

You and me both!
 
M

mustangman289hp

Member
Jul 27, 2010
32
0
6
The Woodlands, TX
Apr 27, 2011
#220
  • Apr 27, 2011
  • #220
Thanks for the reply! wish i could put like 8 grand into a nice build... i think ill dump my money into my car and THEN get married hahaha
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • 42
Next
First Prev 11 of 42 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
647
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
56
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
660
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
A
Resolved Electrical Help Please
  • Alabama
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
251
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?