• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine On stock GT - any benefits to higher octane gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrPerfect2
  • Start date Start date Jul 26, 2019

MrPerfect2

5 Year Member
Jul 23, 2019
308
54
48
Washington DC
Jul 26, 2019
#1
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #1
No mods on car 91 . I tried several gasoline brands and several octane ratings . Is there any positive or negative effects of brands and octane ratings ? Is the 87 octane better for full detonation on a non modded 5.0 ? Does it burn hotter and will it increase engine temps ? Will the stock Computer under WOT automatically advance the timing to a higher degree if higher octane is used ? I know most everyone has mods done and for them it may be different , but my car is just a clean stock daily driver . Thanks
 
D

DSB88GT

Active Member
Nov 6, 2016
175
37
38
Jul 26, 2019
#2
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #2
You would be wasting your money using anything other than 87.
 

MrPerfect2

5 Year Member
Jul 23, 2019
308
54
48
Washington DC
Jul 26, 2019
#3
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #3
Ok - aside from $ aspect - what happens when you use 87 vs 93 , anything ? Does anything change - runs hotter ; more or less power ? More complete combustion ?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 26, 2019
#4
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #4
Do you have detonation with 87 octane? If not...keep running it.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 26, 2019
#5
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #5
MrPerfect2 said:
More complete combustion ?
Click to expand...

Actually, less.

Lower octane burns quicker and more complete. Higher octane just resists burn, so it helps combat pre ignition when used in power adder, or modified applications.

Ideally, you want to run the lowest octane you can get away with without detonation (pre ignition). If you are bone stock (timing set to 10 degrees), stick to 87 unless you have detonation. Detonation in older cars can be caused by carbon deposits on the heads if the engine is rather dirty. So in some cases you may need to run 89 octane or so to avoid this.
 
Reactions: Decipha

MrPerfect2

5 Year Member
Jul 23, 2019
308
54
48
Washington DC
Jul 26, 2019
#6
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #6
Ok - it runs great on 87 - no pre-detonation sounds from idle to WOT - I will stick with 87 - thanks
 

Real time recon

Mustang Master
Aug 21, 2016
469
205
83
...
Jul 26, 2019
#7
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #7
Only burning 93 no ethanol gas here.And getting a nice blue flame LOL
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,445
1,530
194
Maryland
Jul 26, 2019
#8
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #8
What if you set your ignition timing more advanced on a stock setup. When mine was stock I bumped the timing to 14 and felt a noticeable improvement in performance. 93 octane can help fend off spark knock of more advance timing cant it?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 26, 2019
#9
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #9
Then you would need higher octane to resist burning your fuel prematurely due to timing advance
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,445
1,530
194
Maryland
Jul 26, 2019
#10
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #10
So correct me if im wrong. The stock 10 BTDC setting is aimed at reduced emissions? Hence, at 10 you sacrifice some performance for cleaner exhaust?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 26, 2019
#11
  • Jul 26, 2019
  • #11
10 degrees base timing is where Ford set it from the factory and based its ECU programming on. You get lower emissions and reduced chance of detonation in most driving conditions. In other words it's safe for most average driving conditions and won't damage the motor

Bump the timing and power goes up, but also some negative side effects such as increased emissions and detonation...hence the need for higher octane.

Scope of this thread is really towards stock cars.
 
Reactions: JD1964

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,109
2,726
224
Vass, NC
Jul 27, 2019
#12
  • Jul 27, 2019
  • #12
Preignition: Ignition before spark

Detonation: End gas 'detonation' after the spark

Preignition is typically caused by a heat source in the cylinder, like the ground strap on a plug with too high of a heat range. Detonation is caused when the flame front causes pressure/temperature in the unburned end-gasses to rise over the auto-ignition temperature of the fuel. Higher octane = higher auto-ignition temperature in a given fuel type. Hence, higher octane resists detonation, but this can also be accomplished by cooling the A/F mixture before the spark or by running a richer mixture that resists detonation through evaporative cooling, which ultimately keeps the end gas temps down below auto-ignition temp.

Preignition is deadly and instantaneous. The fuel typically burns completely as the piston is still rising to compress it. Detonation can be deadly, but mild detonation typically is not, at least initially. Detonation unchecked can lead to preignition as pieces of piston, plug, ring, head or other material is picked off and remains as a "hot spot" in the cylinder that potentially ignites the incoming mixture. Obviously, unless you are tuning on the ragged edge in an engine-masters shoot-out, you don't want detonation, either.

Answer to title question for a good condition stock engine, including timing as Mike stated, is no.
 
Last edited: Jul 27, 2019

MrPerfect2

5 Year Member
Jul 23, 2019
308
54
48
Washington DC
Jul 27, 2019
#13
  • Jul 27, 2019
  • #13
Thanks guys ! Excellent feedback , hope others ( and me ) learned from your explanations!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
168
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Let’s talk gasoline -
  • MrPerfect2
  • Apr 12, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
82
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 16, 2021
96stangfl
9
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
New Gauges...Accurate? Well Made? Safe?
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2019
jrichker
JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?