• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Our motor only weights 10lbs lighter than the 5.0??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lx89Stang05
  • Start date Start date Feb 16, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

conor

New Member
Aug 13, 2003
46
0
0
San Diego, CA
Feb 17, 2004
#21
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #21
Boss 351 said:
"poor guy is on carb'd power"
Click to expand...

 

85 Coupe 5.0

Founding Member
Dec 18, 2001
817
2
16
44
Kansas
www.myspace.com
Feb 17, 2004
#22
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #22
(&) said:
I've heard that a carbed 302 with aluminum heads is lighter than a stock 2.3T. That's not really important since it's not a stock vs. stock comparison, and who wants to run a carb? But I thought it was interesting.

Even if it's true, all the extra space in the front of my engine compartment leads me to believe that the weight distribution would always be better with the 2.3, and to me that's more important than just how much it weighs.
Click to expand...

Why run a carb? I can spend $5.00 on a set of jets to taylor my carb to my setup.

a set of injectors will set ya back $300.00 or so.

Now here is some FACT for everyone.

My current '85 coupe used to be a good 'ol 2.3L. Weighed in at 3200 LBS.
I swaped in my lightly modded 5.0L, 8.8 in. rearend and T-5
Weighed in at 3350 LBS. This was done the night before and the night after the swap was complete.
 
6

63_Fairlane

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2001
215
0
16
Greenville, SC
Mar 13, 2004
#23
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #23
More interesting is the fact that the 4.6 ...even the aluminum versions are as heavy as the old 5.0!!! You would think that with Pro-E and all the advancements over the years they could make a lighter V8 engine!!?



At least according to the referencesed website.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 13, 2004
#24
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #24
63_Fairlane said:
More interesting is the fact that the 4.6 ...even the aluminum versions are as heavy as the old 5.0!!! You would think that with Pro-E and all the advancements over the years they could make a lighter V8 engine!!?



At least according to the referencesed website.
Click to expand...
OHC heads tend to be heavier, and since the V8 has 2 heads, this effect is muliplied.
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
64
Indianapolis, Indiana
www.geocities.com
Mar 13, 2004
#25
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #25
63_Fairlane said:
More interesting is the fact that the 4.6 ...even the aluminum versions are as heavy as the old 5.0!!! You would think that with Pro-E and all the advancements over the years they could make a lighter V8 engine!!?



At least according to the referencesed website.
Click to expand...

Making it out of aluminum you have two options.

1) Make the motor much lighter at the same structural strength.

2) Make the motor much stronger at the same weight.

Ford leaned toward the much stronger side.

The 4.6L motor is considerably stronger and the DOHC motor is a monster with 4 bolt mains and cross bolted caps like the 427 NASCAR and Lemans motors used.
 

Asha'man

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,909
0
0
41
Denver
Mar 14, 2004
#26
  • Mar 14, 2004
  • #26
I saw a picture somewhere of a 4.6 and a 302 side by side.....the 4.6 is HUGE compared to the 5.0. Even if it is aluminum, the sheer mass difference has to make a diff.

Ash
 

notched86

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
305
1
0
Ruckersville, VA
www.23stangs.stangnet.com
Mar 14, 2004
#27
  • Mar 14, 2004
  • #27
Yeah we have a '96 Mustang GT and the 4.6 does look alot bigger. In reality though, I don't think it's much bigger at all, the engine bay and they way the intake manifold and air intake is setup, it just makes it look that way.
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
64
Indianapolis, Indiana
www.geocities.com
Mar 15, 2004
#28
  • Mar 15, 2004
  • #28
The 4.6L is not as tall as a 5.0L but it is much wider. The 4.6L is almost as wide as a 429 big block.
 

notched86

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
305
1
0
Ruckersville, VA
www.23stangs.stangnet.com
Mar 15, 2004
#29
  • Mar 15, 2004
  • #29
Why is the 4.6 so much wider? Does anyone know?
 
A

a351Must2

Windsor II
Founding Member
Mar 12, 1999
4,317
0
0
Snohomish, WA
a351must2.melangdesign.com
Mar 15, 2004
#30
  • Mar 15, 2004
  • #30
notched86 said:
Why is the 4.6 so much wider? Does anyone know?
Click to expand...

...because it's a 90 degree V8 with cams on top of each head.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
608
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
581
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
205
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
677
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
748
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?