• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Outnumbered By Idiots

  • Thread starter Thread starter tannerc91gt
  • Start date Start date Sep 19, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 83
Next
First Prev 8 of 83 Next Last

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#141
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #141
Gearbanger 101 said:
Actually, my comment was more directed towards the entire build being uses as an example, not so much just the glorified fuel leak bolted to the manifold. Purpose built race cars are "NOT" the example carb nug huggers use when they compare the two. He may only have $1,500 wrapped up into the carb itself, but he's got $40k+ sunk into the rest of it. WOT thrust is one thing....but lets see how that thing runs around when its not going in a straight line with the drivers foot in the oil pan for 1,320ft at a time.

That article makes it sound like the carb was what tied it altogether and was the missing link needed to complete the build. Never mind that he went from an F1R to a big ol 88mm turbo set up at the same time?!? You don't think he could have made as much power, or more had he build it from the start as an EFI?

If someone is building it from scratch....sure, the sky is the limit. Run whatever you want. But when I see someone scrap their EFI system, just to backwards convert their set up to a carb because it's "simpler" and "cheaper".....even though removing the EFI and buying the needed parts for the conversion was probably more complex and expensive than just having the prior EFI set up tuned properly to start with, I have to shake my head.




No **** poor fuel economy
No filthy emmisions
No doggy warm weather performance
No blown power valves, or yearly carb kits
No need to rejett for elevation, or weather
No sitting in the car, freezing your ass off to keep it running during cold start
No stalling in the rain at every traffic light
No need to smell like raw fuel wherever you go
No having to convince yourself you made the right decision ripping a perfectly good EFI system off of your car, to backwards convert your engine to some archaic carburetor, no matter how much it cost, or how much trouble it gives you.

Click to expand...

I'll agree that an EFI car will outperform a carbureted version when comparing efficiency, and emissions, but the rest of that sounds like crap.
I will not try to convince you that a carburetor isn't a "fuel leak". Despite the fact that most of those exaggerations you used to make your point were pulled straight out of your butt. As long as you think that every carb user has to rebuild his carb yearly, or the driver smells like gas, or that the car stalls in the rain at every light. pretty much tells me that you refuse to even think rationally in the argument.
and I gotta ask....
What does an EFI car do to help the driver avoid freezing in the morning on a cold start? ( I know you're not gonna say remote start,..unless you can associate every FI car w/it)
 
Last edited: Oct 13, 2016
Reactions: A5literMan and Boosted92LX

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 13, 2016
#142
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #142
So for s and giggles consider me an 18 y/o undecided voter. Why does every boosted build in this part of the forum run stand alone or modified factory efi?
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#143
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #143
Davedacarpainter said:
See now, I'm understanding the problem a little better here now. Once you EFI guys saw this y'all started to feel inadequate about your engine bays
Click to expand...
Are the napkins there to hide the really hideous parts Dave? I feel like I'm looking at a censored **** pic.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and stykthyn

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#144
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #144
stykthyn said:
So for ****s and giggles consider me an 18 y/o undecided voter. Why does every boosted build in this part of the forum run stand alone or modified factory efi?
Click to expand...
I changed it. (What do you do anyway,..open a new reply as soon as it pops up?)
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 13, 2016
#145
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #145
madmike1157 said:
I changed it. (What do you do anyway,..open a new reply as soon as it pops up?)
Click to expand...
Forum notification reply?
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#146
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #146
stykthyn said:
So for ****s and giggles consider me an 18 y/o undecided voter. Why does every boosted build in this part of the forum run stand alone or modified factory efi?
Click to expand...
Annddd that would be me.

I did it because the last car was carbureted and I wanted a change on this one. I wanted the challenge of the ECU build, and had that intake manifold design in my head for a long time. But,......I've often kicked myself everytime I consider that the EFI system is my weak point now. I have to rely on Steve to help me get that engine tuned now,..and I won't know what the fck happens if/when a sensor goes bad after that. Had I went that way though a BT carb would've been as simple as I stated it was. I still would've used a WB sensor to monitor AFR, but 4 nuts and a fuel line is all that stands in the way of a start up with a carb.
There were several intake manifolds for that head/engine already made to accommodate a carb,...probably would've saved me 100+ hours of custom work to use one.

The people that crack on a carburetor have never even owned one, and when/if they did, they must've had one that had been on a factory based install that had been on the engine for 80k miles, because they simply aren't the constant maintenance issue they make them out to be. MOF,...the opposite. I played with the carb "on purpose", not because I had to.
The red car had a 600 CFM vac secondary carb on a 4.6. The engine started on the first crank and it still got 23 MPG when I drove it to MW w/ a 3.73 gear. I put almost 12k miles on that car before I sold it, and I never had to re-jet the carb, or change out a blown PV . I never smelled like gas (but I did smell like exhaust,....just like I did when the car had the EFI'd 4 banger in it when I drove it for a month before I parked it)
 
Reactions: A5literMan

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#147
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #147
stykthyn said:
Forum notification reply?
Click to expand...
So when that happens...do you get to see the original reply, or the one after I had second thoughts? or Do you just get a notification that I replied to you, and it is what it is when you look?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 13, 2016
#148
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #148
I see the original. I don't see any edits or further replies until I log in.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#149
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #149
stykthyn said:
I see the original. I don't see any edits or further replies until I log in.
Click to expand...
The one that has the DT reference then?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 13, 2016
#150
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #150
Yes
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#151
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #151
stykthyn said:
Yes
Click to expand...
Alrighty then.

Ignore that. Just look at the new, improved version. I'll keep my politics to myself.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 13, 2016
#152
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #152
madmike1157 said:
Annddd that would be me.

I did it because the last car was carbureted and I wanted a change on this one. I wanted the challenge of the ECU build, and had that intake manifold design in my head for a long time. But,......I've often kicked myself everytime I consider that the EFI system is my weak point now. I have to rely on Steve to help me get that engine tuned now,..and I won't know what the fck happens if/when a sensor goes bad after that. Had I went that way though a BT carb would've been as simple as I stated it was. I still would've used a WB sensor to monitor AFR, but 4 nuts and a fuel line is all that stands in the way of a start up with a carb.
There were several intake manifolds for that head/engine already made to accommodate a carb,...probably would've saved me 100+ hours of custom work to use one.

The people that crack on a carburetor have never even owned one, and when/if they did, they must've had one that had been on a factory based install that had been on the engine for 80k miles, because they simply aren't the constant maintenance issue they make them out to be. MOF,...the opposite. I played with the carb "on purpose", not because I had to.
The red car had a 600 CFM vac secondary carb on a 4.6. The engine started on the first crank and it still got 23 MPG when I drove it to MW w/ a 3.73 gear. I put almost 12k miles on that car before I sold it, and I never had to re-jet the carb, or change out a blown PV . I never smelled like gas (but I did smell like exhaust,....just like I did when the car had the EFI'd 4 banger in it when I drove it for a month before I parked it)
Click to expand...
So back on topic, why don't you remove the system you are frustrated with and go back to a carb?
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Oct 13, 2016
#153
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #153
madmike1157 said:
Are the napkins there to hide the really hideous parts Dave? I feel like I'm looking at a censored **** pic.
Click to expand...
Nah, those are dryer sheets. The rats that were living there don't like those very much and moved out.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Oct 13, 2016
#154
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #154
madmike1157 said:
Annddd that would be me.

I did it because the last car was carbureted and I wanted a change on this one. I wanted the challenge of the ECU build, and had that intake manifold design in my head for a long time. But,......I've often kicked myself everytime I consider that the EFI system is my weak point now. I have to rely on Steve to help me get that engine tuned now,..and I won't know what the fck happens if/when a sensor goes bad after that. Had I went that way though a BT carb would've been as simple as I stated it was. I still would've used a WB sensor to monitor AFR, but 4 nuts and a fuel line is all that stands in the way of a start up with a carb.
There were several intake manifolds for that head/engine already made to accommodate a carb,...probably would've saved me 100+ hours of custom work to use one.

The people that crack on a carburetor have never even owned one, and when/if they did, they must've had one that had been on a factory based install that had been on the engine for 80k miles, because they simply aren't the constant maintenance issue they make them out to be. MOF,...the opposite. I played with the carb "on purpose", not because I had to.
The red car had a 600 CFM vac secondary carb on a 4.6. The engine started on the first crank and it still got 23 MPG when I drove it to MW w/ a 3.73 gear. I put almost 12k miles on that car before I sold it, and I never had to re-jet the carb, or change out a blown PV . I never smelled like gas (but I did smell like exhaust,....just like I did when the car had the EFI'd 4 banger in it when I drove it for a month before I parked it)
Click to expand...
Just like all OEM EFI systems Mike the megasquirt also has a check engine light function I'll have to do some more reading on it before I give a long-winded explanation. But when something's just not acting right you just plug your laptop in and take a look at the sensors and see what they're doing for instance if injectors are firing you'll see the pulses if all of a sudden you lose your ECT sensor your water temperature will stay at a steady 180 degrees same goes for your air temperature. That's the wonderful part about sensor feedback if there's something wrong it's staring you in the face.
 
Reactions: A5literMan, stykthyn and hoopty5.0

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Oct 13, 2016
#155
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #155
stykthyn said:
So for ****s and giggles consider me an 18 y/o undecided voter. Why does every boosted build in this part of the forum run stand alone or modified factory efi?
Click to expand...

You wanna know what part of my efi is still factory? The wiring harness. That's it. Unless you count the fuel tank that used to hold the stock pump.. So there goes that argument.

And you know what? This is my first boosted car, and I went efi because all the people "that knew what they were talking about"... said you had to.

When I met the guy in my home town laying down 900 hp in a fox with a blow thru carb that cost less than my megasquirt, not to mention the thousands i have tied up in efi components, I was pissed, to say the least. That car runs great.. and he goes to Houston and kicks Lamborghinis asses regularly on the highway.. I was telling my friend at work that introduced me to him about this thead this morning and he literally laughed out loud..
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 13, 2016
#156
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #156
You carb guys get soooo upset when you feel the rest of the automotive community doesn't properly embrace and worships your ancient artifact.

It entertains me, greatly.
 
Reactions: Adieu, krazedstang and Davedacarpainter

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 13, 2016
#157
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #157
Gearbanger 101 said:
You carb guys get soooo upset when you feel the rest of the automotive community doesn't properly embrace and worships your ancient artifact.

It entertains me, greatly.
Click to expand...
I am not upset. I was actually discussing the topic, and asked that you clarify your position w/ a couple of additional questions
 
Reactions: Boosted92LX

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Oct 13, 2016
#158
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #158
I always get carb envy when I see a Fox with a smoothed bay and there aren't any dang wires to tuck!! However going from EFI to carb on a Fox will cost you much more money over stand alone ECU in the long run. Think about the resell value of your car.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Oct 13, 2016
#159
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #159
FoxMustangLvr said:
Think about the resell value of your car.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it really kills it. The guy with the turbo fox I mentioned above just turned down a 15k offer for it. He must be sick over his loss of resale value...

Gearbanger 101 said:
You carb guys get soooo upset when you feel the rest of the automotive community doesn't properly embrace and worships your ancient artifact.

It entertains me, greatly.
Click to expand...

And a third time FOR THE WIN!!!! An inaccurate post by gear bangaaaaaaaarrrrrrr!!!!!
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Oct 13, 2016
#160
  • Oct 13, 2016
  • #160
So much pisstivity in this thread. I was just curious as to why someone would choose one over the other and actual responses from those that have done it.
 
Reactions: A5literMan, 90sickfox, krazedstang and 3 others
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 83
Next
First Prev 8 of 83 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
722
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
838
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
402
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?