ohh ok so now we are playing the almost what if game. Lets not even bother to have them play the games anymore, it can all be done on paper b/c almost and what if seems to be good enough
Again, if this is so then how come the last time the Pats beat us was in 2003 when we were down to a 3rd string QB and STILL almost won?
.
OFFENSIVE SIGNALS!!!!!! come on 04 you know better than that.. the were taping offensive groupings
In the commisioners speach last tuesday ( I listened to the whole thing) he stated that it's LEGAL and remians legal to tape signals... just not legal to do so from a location that a member of the coaching staff can access it.. ( remember 3 walls and a roof)
So since walsh admitted that the tapes were in his hands untill AFTER the game was over that eliminates an possible cheating with these tapes if walsh is telling the truth..
I am going to ask you and the rest of hater nation to use some logic on this one..
since it's legal to tape signals ( confirmed by the NFL comissioner) to be used in a later game and the patriots used taped signals in a later game all they did wrong was tape from a illegal location
I don't have a camera with a big lense and all of that stuff, it's a Sony cam that my mom has. If I were to buy a camera for myself, i'd get one with a LOT of zoom and all of that good stuff, but oh well.. I can't complain
Most of the pics will come in warm-ups tho.. I'll be too pumped to think about taking pictures during most of the game lol
for all anyone knows, teams could have people in the stands using SLR camera's to photograph signals with, and then they email the photos to a coach or somethiing.
so really this whole thing is pointless and without merit.
If you have good seats it wont matter. I belive you are sitting closer then I was last year and all I had was 3.2MP w/ not that much zoom.
View attachment 316968
ohh ok so now we are playing the almost what if game. Lets not even bother to have them play the games anymore, it can all be done on paper b/c almost and what if seems to be good enough
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say. We took you right down to the wire with a 3rd string QB in the same year you won the Super Bowl. Even you can't tell me that doesn't mean something, especially when it's your only win over us since 2000.
We've beat the Steelers 5 out of the last 6 times, including beating them at Pittsburgh the year they won the SB (since apparently beating a team the year they win the SB means a lot for some odd reason).
We've beat the Colts 7 out of the last 10 times.
I don't see the point in caring about trends like that with as much change that goes through the league from year to year with free agency and everything.
unfortunately, trends do mean quite a bit in the NFL, and it takes quite a bit to reverse a trend or put a stop to it.
until the Pats stop getting owned by the broncos, that trend is one that I will continue to put my money on the Broncos regardless of where they play.
unfortunately, trends do mean quite a bit in the NFL, and it takes quite a bit to reverse a trend or put a stop to it.
Yeah like the Patiots winning superbowls
OH SNAP!!!!
ok they have 1 more than the broncos big deal. the cowboys have 2 more than the pats. the 49'ers have 2 more than the Pats. the Steelers have 2 more than the Pats.
so really what's your point?
oh snap.
My point? My point is who's been more successful then the Patriots for the past 7 seasons? When did any of the teams you just mention amount to anything in recent years other then the Steelers superbowl win then falling to the basment.
Translation - We are just enjoying our moment in the sun while it lasts.
'Tis what Giants fans need to do as well. Won't last long, so enjoy it while you can.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?