• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Performance not as expected.....?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94tang
  • Start date Start date Aug 14, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 14, 2006
#1
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #1
The car.....'94 gt with:

3.55 gear
D&D rear control arm kit
Underdrive pulleys
CAI

ran a best 14.22@96.3mph at Bristol dragway in TN....sept. '04

Same car sept. '05 14.44@?mph

After install of Cobra u/l,BBK 70mm tb,BBK shortys.....14.38@96.43

Fuel and ignition system checks out ok........so whats the deal?....i was expecting high 13's after the last mods......any suggestions?


all runs were on street tires with low to mid 2.2x 60 fts.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 14, 2006
#2
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #2
You should be shifting higher with the new changes. How do you know the fuel checked out ok? You could be a little lean up top from the added air from the new mods. Street tires and shi tty 60's aren't helping either.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Aug 14, 2006
#3
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #3
Yeah after my performer my first pass was near the same. I kept upping my shift points and the MPH kept going up. I started Shifting at 6k and it ran 13.90s with similar mods.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Aug 14, 2006
#4
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #4
Not too bad. You gotta remember that the potential increase in hp of any single mod increases with other mods. For example, when I put my heads on I still had stock H-pipe and intake. But, my car ran .4sec faster. When I put on the catted x-pipe the car picked up another .25sec. Finally put the Explorer intake on and ran .36s faster. They all work together.

So, you put a Cobra u/l intake and only knocked off a tenth. Well, with stock heads and that four catted H-pipe I am not surprised. Maybe the stock heads really are the biggest bottle-neck in a stock system

FWIW I installed my headers early in the mod list like you and they didn't help at all on 1/4ET.

:SNSign:
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 14, 2006
#5
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #5
JJ95GTID said:
Not too bad. You gotta remember that the potential increase in hp of any single mod increases with other mods. For example, when I put my heads on I still had stock H-pipe and intake. But, my car ran .4sec faster. When I put on the catted x-pipe the car picked up another .25sec. Finally put the Explorer intake on and ran .36s faster. They all work together.

So, you put a Cobra u/l intake and only knocked off a tenth. Well, with stock heads and that four catted H-pipe I am not surprised. Maybe the stock heads really are the biggest bottle-neck in a stock system

FWIW I installed my headers early in the mod list like you and they didn't help at all on 1/4ET.

:SNSign:
Click to expand...


oh yeah i also have a Mac off-road h-pipe on that dumps right before the rear end
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 14, 2006
#6
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #6
ignition system has less than 10k miles on it....plugs,wires,dist. cap.,rotor button,coil........i have a fuel pressure gage installed on the car and pressure seems to on par....i know the 60 fts. suck,i just posted that for informational purposes
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 14, 2006
#7
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #7
I kinda wonder if he has a stick or auto trans

I looked but didn't see it

lower 60 foot will do wonders for your et

Practice ... Practice ... Practice

Grady
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 14, 2006
#8
  • Aug 14, 2006
  • #8
yeah its a 5-speed.....my main concern is the times(and mph) not improving after the intake,headers,tb install....i know my 60 ft times need work......as stated before the 60 ft times were posted for informaton purposes
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Aug 15, 2006
#9
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #9
was the weather different between the 3 runs that can make a big difference running in the heat and mostly the humidity can slow you way down.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Aug 15, 2006
#10
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #10
Couldn't a 70mm TB be a bit of an overkill? Someone chime in.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Aug 15, 2006
#11
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #11
95Vert said:
Couldn't a 70mm TB be a bit of an overkill? Someone chime in.
Click to expand...
no i think that would be fine. I would play with your shift points, where are you shifting at?
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 15, 2006
#12
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #12
before the intake i was shifting at 5000....after the intake i tried shifting at 5500 but it didnt seem to make much difference....something else i forgot to mention is all 8 of my plugs look brand new,but theyve been in the car for at least 6 months.There is absolutely no color on the porcelin,and they were like that before the intake........lean?
 
Z

zZsKyZz

Member
Dec 1, 2005
503
0
17
Aug 15, 2006
#13
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #13
I'm running a 15.3.. Guess the trans and a hardtop really make a difference.. i'd be happy with 14's.
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 15, 2006
#14
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #14
YEAHLOH95 said:
was the weather different between the 3 runs that can make a big difference running in the heat and mostly the humidity can slow you way down.
Click to expand...


as i recall the first run in '04 it was rather cool that night.....the last run in '06 it was god awful hot......could i have lost .3 or so from that?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 15, 2006
#15
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #15
94tang said:
before the intake i was shifting at 5000....after the intake i tried shifting at 5500 but it didnt seem to make much difference....something else i forgot to mention is all 8 of my plugs look brand new,but theyve been in the car for at least 6 months.There is absolutely no color on the porcelin,and they were like that before the intake........lean?
Click to expand...

You give no sig but from what I can tell, you still are runnn stock inj's and maf.

Unless you have jacked up the fuel pressure, I'd say you most likely are runnin a bit lean.

The GT's are pretty well known to be setup like that from day one.

Grady
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 15, 2006
#16
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #16
yeah still have stock inj.'s and maf
 

94tang

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 24, 2003
297
4
19
East TN
Aug 15, 2006
#17
  • Aug 15, 2006
  • #17
friend of mine has a '92 GT that is bone stock with the exception of a t-70 turbo kit(w/ bigger inj. of course).He runs a wideband inside the car and said his plugs looked the same,but his AFR according to the wideband stays around 11.5-12:1.........
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Aug 16, 2006
#18
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #18
zZsKyZz said:
I'm running a 15.3.. Guess the trans and a hardtop really make a difference.. i'd be happy with 14's.
Click to expand...

Is something wrong with your car?
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 16, 2006
#19
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #19
95Vert said:
Couldn't a 70mm TB be a bit of an overkill? Someone chime in.
Click to expand...
Yes a 70mm tb flows more then a cobra (and the like) intake can handle, an average 94/95 cobra flows an average of 198 cfm (unported) while a BBK 70mm tb flows 726cfm. The stock Ford 60mm tb flows 526 CFM which is more then enough....
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Aug 16, 2006
#20
  • Aug 16, 2006
  • #20
wytstang said:
Yes a 70mm tb flows more then a cobra (and the like) intake can handle, an average 94/95 cobra flows an average of 198 cfm (unported) while a BBK 70mm tb flows 726cfm. The stock Ford 60mm tb flows 526 CFM which is more then enough....
Click to expand...

I knew I had heard this before, I just didn't remember the numbers. You're a damn computer Wyt. Thanks
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
M
Staying just below 400rwhp 2002 gt auto?
  • Mob79
  • Jan 8, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
839
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2019
R4ymond
R
M
Engine High AFR / exhaust backfire on one side of exhaust
  • My Name Is Phillip
  • Jul 31, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 4, 2020
Joshf350
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?