When I start it up though, for the first few minutes it runs smooth..Any ideas experts? 
Poka sorry to hear about your troubles. Hope you get that all sorted out. I have a question though. Im starting to accumulate parts for a mild 351 setup that Ill be swapping into my 95 down the road. One of the several things Im still not sure on is can you still use the stock PCM to control the 5.8? Ive heard people on both sides of the fence and I figured Id rather ask someone that has one up and running.. even if it is running a little rough.
)Next Issue:
When she warms up and on the beltway for a bit, it begins to run rough and really buck below 2k rpm..like it is on 7 cylinders and the check engine lights up. But when I got off the b-way, check engine light turned off again but still runs ruffWhen I start it up though, for the first few minutes it runs smooth..Any ideas experts?
![]()
Next Issue:
When she warms up and on the beltway for a bit, it begins to run rough and really buck below 2k rpm..like it is on 7 cylinders and the check engine lights up. But when I got off the b-way, check engine light turned off again but still runs ruffWhen I start it up though, for the first few minutes it runs smooth..Any ideas experts?
![]()
Poka sorry to hear about your troubles. Hope you get that all sorted out. I have a question though. Im starting to accumulate parts for a mild 351 setup that Ill be swapping into my 95 down the road. One of the several things Im still not sure on is can you still use the stock PCM to control the 5.8? Ive heard people on both sides of the fence and I figured Id rather ask someone that has one up and running.. even if it is running a little rough.

The pcm family for 94-95 Stangs consists of 5 different versions of software![]()
One of them is the ZA0 which was used in the Cobra R powered by a 351
As a matter of fact
You could use a Tweecer to upload the ZAO calibration file to your existing
pcm you now are using![]()
Grady
) so a 5.8 will just have more load compared to a 302 using the exact same computer.x2![]()
And for another who has done it, i put a 351 with ported twisted wedge heads, TFS-R intake, and a Ed C. cam in my car and tuned it with a PMS just fine.....
Which means i used the stock GT setup and just modified it...no use of an actual 5.8 program....
I think its so easy with the PMS because our cars are load based (right grady?) so a 5.8 will just have more load compared to a 302 using the exact same computer.
Anywho, just my experience....
Next Issue: As you know I did the fox TB conversion but I couldn't justify paying $94 for a new throttle cable. So I bought a used one,..but every time I hit the gas...Sqqqqqueeeeeek! Anybody run into this? I wd40'd it too.![]()

The 36# tune seems ok, and new 02's and plugs but on start up, I still need to floor it sometimes to crank over - not sure why.

If you are still using an unmodified pcm
or
Unless your start up fuel table has been optimized![]()
It thinks you got 19lb inj's![]()
but
In reality you are suppling almost twice the fuel when you crank it![]()
Grady
.. so I wonder if I put the vacuum tube back into the intake tube then maybe it will go away!
But I will have to close of the OTHER valve cover's breather if Hisson was right.Ahh, ok, so there is a "startup" table too?? Thanks x10 for the info Grady! I think the startup table is either programmed for 24# or 19# . Kauffman's just programmed the 36# tune thru te mail for me to get it running well enough to drive it up to them in the next few weeks..I bet they did not tune that particular table.
I was putting a washer behind it that did NOT allow it to center properly on the spindle that the bearing wraps around.. So to correct that yet still move the tensioner out a hair (it seems to stop spitting the belt out when I do that) , I fabricated a nylon washer to fit AROUND the spindle so that the pulley can still center AND mobe properly. I will report back tomorrow..