• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Port matching intake to ported E7's, & R.Rocker Q's

  • Thread starter Thread starter bloopbloob
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2007

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Sep 12, 2007
#1
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • #1
Just wondering whats the best way to port match a new intake to ported E7's (staying on engine)? Just make a template of the heads and then transfer over to the intake manifold?

Next question is what kind of gains will aftermarket roller rockers make over stock (on ported heads)? I dont know too much about valvetrain components. Should i go 1.6 or 1.7 and why? Is it difficult to install them correctly? Anything else i would need to do the swap? (springs?)
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Sep 13, 2007
#2
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #2
ttt
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Sep 13, 2007
#3
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #3
I believe most people do the port work by going by the gaskets. My heads and intake are both basket matched to Felpro 1250s so in theory they should line up near perfectly.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Sep 13, 2007
#4
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #4
get some machinist's blue, or any dye in a can, put it on the intake manifold. then take the gasket you will use on the heads, line the gasket up on the intake perfectly. then take something with a VERY FINE point on it and scribe a line around the edge of the gaskets, the line will show up good with dye on the manifold.

then take a die grinder and a good alum cutting bit ( less teeth) and open the port to the line and blend it all in about an inch or so.

not hard at all just takes a little time.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 13, 2007
#5
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #5
I heard that port matching doesnt yield any real gains. for the best results you have to port the entire runner?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Sep 13, 2007
#6
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #6
stykthyn said:
I heard that port matching doesnt yield any real gains. for the best results you have to port the entire runner?
Click to expand...


Well it's not going to give you mountains of power or probably anything you can really feel, BUT my buddy gasket matched the intake and exhaust ports on a set of E7s (the ones on my car right now) and he dynoed back to back before and after and picked up 11hp at the wheels....that's not bad at all for just a few hours in grinding.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Sep 13, 2007
#7
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #7
stykthyn said:
I heard that port matching doesnt yield any real gains. for the best results you have to port the entire runner?
Click to expand...

depends on difference situations.

if you have some nice heads that are ported good. and your intake isnt matched, its not ideal.

sure it may be not be a big difference but its just one of those small things that adds up with other small things then it starts making a difference.

and to bloopbloob.

what intake did you get exactly and what cam are your running?

the basic aftermarket rockers come as stock replacments, alot of of them come pedestal mount, which is like factory, the rocker bolts down to the head and there is no real adjustment.

very easy to install. you just bolt them down. 1.7s will give you some lift but nothing you can feel.

i put 1.7s on my stock cam and i couldnt tell a difference.
theni ran a b-cam in my engine i rebuilt and it bumped the lift of the B to around
.510 which is pretty good, the B cam is lacking in lift anways.

alot of aftermarket alum heads like TFS and AFR etc are meant for stud mount rockers which need adjustment. i think edelbrock is one who makes a pedestal mount head .
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Sep 13, 2007
#8
  • Sep 13, 2007
  • #8
Foxfan88 said:
depends on difference situations.

if you have some nice heads that are ported good. and your intake isnt matched, its not ideal.

sure it may be not be a big difference but its just one of those small things that adds up with other small things then it starts making a difference.

and to bloopbloob.

what intake did you get exactly and what cam are your running?

the basic aftermarket rockers come as stock replacments, alot of of them come pedestal mount, which is like factory, the rocker bolts down to the head and there is no real adjustment.

very easy to install. you just bolt them down. 1.7s will give you some lift but nothing you can feel.

i put 1.7s on my stock cam and i couldnt tell a difference.
theni ran a b-cam in my engine i rebuilt and it bumped the lift of the B to around
.510 which is pretty good, the B cam is lacking in lift anways.

alot of aftermarket alum heads like TFS and AFR etc are meant for stud mount rockers which need adjustment. i think edelbrock is one who makes a pedestal mount head .
Click to expand...

I dont have the intake yet... still trying to figure out exactly where i want to go right now. I'm leaning towards just a cobra for now, then when the time comes for a full h/c/i, i'll sell it and buy a matched kit.
My heads have been ported, so i'm sure port matching would help. i'm not expecting big gains or anything, but i figure i might as well do it while its apart.
Stock cam
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 14, 2007
#9
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #9
11 is not bad at all
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Sep 14, 2007
#10
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #10
11 at the wheels is actually a really good gain. thats about 15-18 at the flywheel just from spending a little time smoothing out the flow. What you want to avoid doing is completely smoothing out/polishing the intake runner as turbulence is actually a good thing in the intake tract. While you are in there...you might as well gasket match the upper to the lower as well. Remove any casting flash or imperfections. Dont go crazy...but any massaging will help.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Sep 14, 2007
#11
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #11
11hp at the wheels is a great gain for the work.

I would just gasket match the intake and heads and call it a day.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 14, 2007
#12
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #12
Use the stock gasket from a Fel Pro MS 93334 gasket kit and use that as a pattern on the intake. Work on the short side turn to make the radius larger - there is a how-to article on my website in the Tech section.
 

DucatiRdr

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
271
2
0
North of Boston, Massachusetts
Sep 14, 2007
#13
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #13
Here is something I saw on a late night show on the DIY network:

They were working on an old Mustang (I think, or was it a T-bird?) and with heads mounted on the block they fit the lower intake to the heads and snugged up the bolts. Then they took a coat hanger and straightened it leaving a small hook at one end and sharpened the end of the hook to a point.

Next, they extended the hook down an intake tract until they felt the hook hit the edge of the head, they then pulled the hanger so the pointed end of the hook poked the edge of any difference between the lower intake and heads. When done with all 8 intake tracts they pulled the upper intake.

Once off, a straightedge was placed on the middle of the marks (vertically) and a line was drawn across so you now have the mean difference across the manifold. The intake-head gasket was mounted so the ports matched up with the line drawn with the straightedge and the ports were traced onto the lower intake and from this guide the porting was done. I guess the concept was that although you are gasket matching you are not ensuring the lower intake and head ports will be properly lined up where this technique guarantees this.

Thoughts?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 14, 2007
#14
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #14
I use that same procedure when I have heads mounted on the already machined block to be used with the head gaskets to be used and the thickness of intake gasket to shim up the intake. What I do different is use a stainless dental pick attached to a wooden rod with a very small tapered end so that the tip is very close the head wall - a coat hanger by virtue of it's thickness will stand off further than the head port wall.

I still say use the MS 93334 gasket - it's close to the head port size.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Sep 14, 2007
#15
  • Sep 14, 2007
  • #15
I think Tmoss has a really nice article on how to make a template too. Check out his tech section on his website. He has a ton of information on there. I read every article i could find....and i the knowledge i gained was well worth the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
500
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 12, 2024
PonyGTrider
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
738
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
907
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine adjust roller rockers on new 393
  • maxine-70
  • Dec 27, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 30, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?