• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Ported GT40P Intake and Heads on a 351W, is this a bad idea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oxemoron
  • Start date Start date Jul 10, 2006
O

oxemoron

New Member
Jul 12, 2003
94
0
0
Jul 10, 2006
#1
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #1
I'm currently on a tight budget but can pickup a 96+ Explorer/Mountaineer engine from a friends junkyard for free. He also said he would give me a low mileage 351W in return for some recent work I did for him. So just wondering if the ported GT40P parts would flow well enough on the 351W and if so how much rwhp might I push. I plan on getting aftermarket parts at some point but this would be temporarily till I have the cash.
 

Hickfied

Member
Nov 9, 2005
413
0
16
Morganton, NC
Jul 10, 2006
#2
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #2
a stock ho intake and e7 heads will work for a temp job... It just wont be making high HP numbers, as well as your GT40 stuff. It will work okay, just make sure it stays temp. and doesn't become perm!
 

5ive.oh

Founding Member
Feb 23, 2001
195
0
0
Rocky Mountain House, AB
Jul 10, 2006
#3
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #3
The heads will work, the intake won't fit. the deck on a 351 is wider then a 302.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 10, 2006
#4
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #4
Just to clarify?
The lower intake from a 302 won't fit a 351w.
However, if you find a GT40 351w lower, then the 302 upper should bolt up just fine to the 351w lower.

I cannot say for sure, as I have never done this.
But I am pretty sure this is true.

I sounds like this would be a good way to get into a low buck 351w conversion.

Good Luck with it,
jason
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 11, 2006
#5
  • Jul 11, 2006
  • #5
it will work - it will just make most of it's power below 5,000 rpm or so. I think you'd be happy with it as a temporary combo. If your up to the conversion (takes more than a different pan and - yes - lower intake), then I'd go for it since the cost will be fairly minimal.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jul 12, 2006
#6
  • Jul 12, 2006
  • #6
as stated above get a 351w lower intake. i think you will be happy with the power difference between the 302 and the 351w. much more torque.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
590
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
582
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
523
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?