• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

ported lower or higher stall

  • Thread starter Thread starter billpo
  • Start date Start date Feb 28, 2006
B

billpo

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
45
0
0
Ottawa, Ontario
Feb 28, 2006
#1
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #1
Hi Guys. I have an 89 gt vert AOD with 3:73's, shift kit, cat back and timing advanced to 14. I am looking to do another mod, but can only do one of the 2 for now.
Should I get my lower intake ported or a higher stall for my AOD.
What will give me the biggest bang for the buck?

Thanx.
Bill
 

Jaswir

Member
Mar 31, 2005
578
0
18
Orlando, FL
Feb 28, 2006
#2
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #2
put the stall in, it would be like driving a different car! really if u have a AOD that should be the first thing to do... u will love it... best bang for the buck!
 

$uperstang

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
476
1
0
Detroit, MI
Feb 28, 2006
#3
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #3
Higher stall 100%, screw the porting! Call Andre at Edge racing and You will not be dissapointed!
 
D

davs5.0

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
921
0
0
windsor,ontario,canada
Feb 28, 2006
#4
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #4
no comparison, the stall will make a world of difference. the lower will be hardly noticeable.
 
B

billpo

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
45
0
0
Ottawa, Ontario
Feb 28, 2006
#5
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #5
Unfortunately I can't afford their prices. I assume an off the shelf one would still be better than the stock?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Feb 28, 2006
#6
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #6
The stall is more money but I would do it first......as far as not "noticing" ~ 50cfm improvement in flow by porting a stock lower - - we got some real experts here........
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Feb 28, 2006
#7
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #7
tmoss said:
The stall is more money but I would do it first......as far as not "noticing" ~ 50cfm improvement in flow by porting a stock lower - - we got some real experts here........
Click to expand...

ditto
 
D

davs5.0

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
921
0
0
windsor,ontario,canada
Mar 1, 2006
#8
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #8
tmoss said:
as far as not "noticing" ~ 50cfm improvement in flow by porting a stock lower - - we got some real experts here........
Click to expand...

I assume that was directed to my comment. I guess I should clarify my comment a bit. I was referring to not noticing a big decrease in et or sotp. the stall would make a much larger NOTICEABLE gain. Ultimately you'd want to do both. Not knocking your work TMOSS, I've heard nothing but good things about you.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 1, 2006
#9
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #9
The two options aren't really comparable -- the stall is gonna cost a LOT more in parts and labor. And, if it's a street driven car, you should probably add the cost of an incremental tranny oil cooler to the install as the increased slippage that comes with the stall really works on the fluid.
 

SilverFoxbody

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
149
0
0
Mar 1, 2006
#10
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #10
stall!
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Mar 1, 2006
#11
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #11
If i have learned one thing from modding my stang, it would be to do it right the first time. What are your longterm goals for the car? do u wanna get in the 11's or 12's or do u wanna just have nice street car that $h/ts on most cars out there? Honestly i wouldnt spend the cash on porting the stock lower. I understand tmoss can do some amazing things w/ the stocker for just over 100 bucks but you can also port an explorer intake that u can pick up for cheap and be flowing way more air and pick up a couple tenths in your ET. Also i wouldnt spend the money on an off the shelf stall b/c you really arent maximizing your setup and you'll be leaving something on the table. This is a tuff call, i would save the $$ and buy a nice intake and have that ported....or save your $$ and buy a nice stall from edge. Also micheal yount mentioned a very good point...dont install a TC without a cooler, your just asking for trouble. Good luck man
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 1, 2006
#12
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #12
....why not lose the auto and spend your money on a manual tranny conversion? Unrequested subjective opinion there....
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 1, 2006
#13
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #13
When I ran a 3,000 stall in front of 4:10 gears, I ran the transmission cooling only on a properly sized oil cooler and did not run the line through the radiator tank - no sense throwing converter heat in the radiator.
 
B

billpo

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
45
0
0
Ottawa, Ontario
Mar 1, 2006
#14
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #14
Thanx for all the input guys. I think I'mgoing to go with a stall. I do not take my car to the track. I just want a car that can hold its own if it has to, and have some fun.

Bill
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
Engine What Aluminum Heads???
  • Iceman1998
  • Sep 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 15, 2024
Noobz347
S
  • Locked
Drivetrain Adjustable clutch cable questions
  • Scott_S
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
386
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
Noobz347
L
2004 Mustang GT issues after bolt-ons added
  • Leo090
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 24, 2025
Leo090
L
F
carb vs cam help needed
  • forango
  • May 2, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2025
forango
F
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?