post you RWHP/RWTQ

Project86

Founding Member

Sep 2, 2000

938

0

16

Clayton, NJ, USA

Oct 15, 2003

#21

• Oct 15, 2003

• #21

TFS heads and intake, stage 1 cam, TFS rockers, and pushrods. 70 mm Tbody, 73 mm mass air. All on a stock 86 302........numbers in sig, dyno chart at: www.svt.stangnet.com

 

95snoozer

Active Member

Dec 14, 2002

2,572

1

48

RCR

Oct 15, 2003

#22

• Oct 15, 2003

• #22

those numnbers are really on 6 pounds of boost?

 

Rootus

Officially Addicted

Feb 8, 2003

6,659

1

0

Portland, Oregon

Oct 15, 2003

#23

• Oct 15, 2003

• #23

95snoozer said:

those numnbers are really on 6 pounds of boost?

Click to expand...

With good flowing heads, I would expect that 417 rwhp is very obtainable on 6 psi...

Dave

 

95kobrah

Founding Member

Dec 5, 2001

387

0

0

Ohio

Oct 16, 2003

#24

• Oct 16, 2003

• #24

See sig... kinda lousy numbers in my opinion... then again my car hasnt run "great" ever since i bought it... the dyno was one of those ones you can pull around on a trailer, it was at the hotrod supernationals 2 summers ago, dunno how big a diff that makes + or - in hp/tq. I NEED MORE MONEY!

 

zenboy99

Founding Member

May 12, 2002

2,212

0

47

Madison, WI

Oct 16, 2003

#25

• Oct 16, 2003

• #25

255rwhp engine cold, running lean

246rwhp@5000 301rwtq@3700

 

S

SPRCHRGD

New Member

Feb 16, 2003

37

0

0

Oct 16, 2003

#26

• Oct 16, 2003

• #26

475rwhp, 484rwtq

 

95YellowGTbeasT

New Member

Mar 4, 2003

605

1

0

South Carolina

Oct 16, 2003

#27

• Oct 16, 2003

• #27

Sorta OT but does anyone know anywhere in south carolina to get a car dynoed?????


-Nick-

 

Project86

Founding Member

Sep 2, 2000

938

0

16

Clayton, NJ, USA

Oct 16, 2003

#28

• Oct 16, 2003

• #28

95snoozer said:

those numnbers are really on 6 pounds of boost?

Click to expand...

Thats what I said,.........the deal is it is pullied for 9 but i have only seen 6 at the most. So it might be moving more air than it sounds for only 6 psi. But I've heard thats good, it means the motor is breathing well. I was happy with the numbers, can't wait for a dyno run with a real blower.

 

95snoozer

Active Member

Dec 14, 2002

2,572

1

48

RCR

Oct 16, 2003

#29

• Oct 16, 2003

• #29

yeah.. with the TFs it would register less boost than with say stock heads. I guess

so 9 pound pully eh? Maybe I will go centrifugul after all.



aftercooled? whats done to your short block?

 

Project86

Founding Member

Sep 2, 2000

938

0

16

Clayton, NJ, USA

Oct 22, 2003

#30

• Oct 22, 2003

• #30

finally got to the track, so far only 6 runs on two different days. But I can only get a 12.4 @113. Each and every run I do one thing or another wrong. Either bad launch or slow/missd shifts. I think with a good 60 foot, I could get close to 11's. I'm usually in the 1.99/2.0 range. But I'm mostly worried about my trap speeds, A little low for 400+RWHP. But then again the tune is all over the place. No idea now what I am making on any given run.

 

Green Machine

Founding Member

Sep 22, 2001

481

9

28

Lakeland Florida

Jan 30, 2004

#31

• Jan 30, 2004

• #31

Rwhp

284.9 / 312 SAE corrected on Dynojet. see sig

 

final5-0

Mustang Master

Apr 6, 2003

6,817

12

79

DFW Texas

Jan 30, 2004

#32

• Jan 30, 2004

• #32

see the sig



Later
Grady

 

Venom351R

Founding Member

Apr 27, 2002

4,548

41

98

MAINE

Jan 30, 2004

#33

• Jan 30, 2004

• #33

See sig, after my winter mods theres going to be a huge change.

 

Rains

Founding Member

Oct 14, 2002

314

0

0

Chico, CALIFORNIA!!!

Jan 30, 2004

#34

• Jan 30, 2004

• #34

190rwhp and 200 rwtq

rains

 

F

Fast94Cobra

New Member

Jan 1, 2003

385

0

0

Atlanta, GA

Jan 31, 2004

#35

• Jan 31, 2004

• #35

1994 cobra, 76mm C&L, offroad h-pipe, flowmaster cat-back, underdrive pullies, lightly ported heads, 233 rwhp/298 rwtq
going to go with a vortech soon... that should help!

 

slvrbullit302

New Member

Jan 6, 2004

986

1

0

Alabama

Jan 31, 2004

#36

• Jan 31, 2004

• #36

214 rwhp/277rwtq
Completely stock except the following bolt-ons......

MAC Eq. shoties, MAC pro chamber, MAC cat-back, ASP pullies, CAI, timing at 12*. middle of august in Fla.

312rwhp/438rwtq.... same mods as above but with 100 shot. done the same day as above.

Old setup...
260rwhp/290rwtq.... ported e7te's, f-cam, 1.6 fms rr's, typhoon intake, 75mm maf, 75mm tb, 30# injectors (a/f 13.5 to 1 with just fpr adjustments), NO CHIP, MAC Long tubes, prochamber and cat back. CAI, pullies timing at 10*.

on 100 shot only made 332rwhp/460rwtq......lots of blow by from 167k miles.

As for the list of stuff in my sig, those dyno numbers will be coming shortly on the new set-up.

 

Venom351R

Founding Member

Apr 27, 2002

4,548

41

98

MAINE

Jan 31, 2004

#37

• Jan 31, 2004

• #37

Rains said:

190rwhp and 200 rwtq

rains

Click to expand...

Do you have a typo? you should have Alot more then 200 FT LBS of TQ even on a bone stock 95.

 

J

jetuomi

Founding Member

Jan 30, 2002

1,464

0

0

Toronto, ON

Jan 31, 2004

#38

• Jan 31, 2004

• #38

220 sae hp / 288 sae tq;

pulleys, efi extender, mac o/r h-pipe, msd coil, stock timing.

coil was good for 1rwhp.. o/r h-pipe was good for 22rwhp.. efi extender was good for 11 rwhp... from a baseline of 186/260 sae

 

G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member

Mar 25, 2002

2,601

12

79

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Jan 31, 2004

#39

• Jan 31, 2004

• #39

Striped5.0 said:

Do you have a typo? you should have Alot more then 200 FT LBS of TQ even on a bone stock 95.

Click to expand...

thats what i just thought.....

 

B

Bling

Founding Member

Jan 17, 2002

127

0

16

L.V N.V.

Jan 31, 2004

#40

• Jan 31, 2004

• #40

See sig.