• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Pro 5.0 users

  • Thread starter Thread starter DRFT_STNG
  • Start date Start date Sep 13, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Sep 14, 2004
#21
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #21
final5-0 said:
I don't have an answer to your Q's but since you asked for imput on the Pro 50 shifter I've been watching this thread to see if anyone would bring up a problem with the shifter transmitting driveline noise or causing other kinds of noise that the stock shifter does not.

I've heard or read this somewhere, is there any truth to it?

DRFT_STNG hoping to get more info *** not hijack your thread

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

Because it takes away the rubber bushings it is a little more rugged feeling. I have heard about people getting the "jackhammer" effect but it can be solved with an upgrade to an aluminum driveshaft.
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Sep 14, 2004
#22
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #22
I've never had any problems with mine though and I am still running the stock driveshaft.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 14, 2004
#23
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #23
swingline said:
Because it takes away the rubber bushings it is a little more rugged feeling. I have heard about people getting the "jackhammer" effect but it can be solved with an upgrade to an aluminum driveshaft.
Click to expand...

Mike

I'm just wondering

Does this "jackhammer" effect make noise or not?

Later
Grady
 
R

rockin_rick

Member
Oct 9, 2003
968
1
17
Sep 14, 2004
#24
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #24
I had a Pro 5.0 on my previous 94, and it was really nice. I wish the handle was more laid back (guess that's why everyone suggests the tri-ax handle). I'm 6'0", and the Pro 5.0 handle was a little stretch. Like I had to pull my right shoulder forward a bit to reach 1,3,5.

I got the B&M now on this 94. Not bad, good handle position. Pro 5.0 was more 'solid', perhaps that was just due to shorter throw.

If I had it to do again, I suppose that I'd go with the tri-ax, a little cheaper than the Pro 5.0 (IIRC) and you get the tri-ax handle with it (of course!).

As for NVH (noise, vibration, harshness), I didn't (and don't) have any problems with that.

Jackhammer??? Are you talking about the vibration that occurs from an out of balance driveshaft or worn U-joints? Never really noticed if an aftermarket shifter exaggerated that effect or not...


Rick
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Big Posi and Neg wire from Starter to Battery and Alt wires..........
  • from6to8
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
224
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
119
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
962
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Exhaust April is the worst month
  • Enzio
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
213
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 7, 2026
LILCBRA
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
160
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?