• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Prochamber vs. o/r x pipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter UofMfooTbaLL24
  • Start date Start date Sep 2, 2004

UofMfooTbaLL24

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
62
0
0
Michigan
Sep 2, 2004
#1
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #1
I was looking on ebay today and saw a mac pro chamber h-pipe with a high temp silicone coating for 209.00. is that a good deal? plus.... I have 40 series flowmasters on my 98 gt, will it sound deeper w/ the O/R prochamber than with an O/R x-pipe?
 
R

Rex'sMach1

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
10
0
0
Sep 2, 2004
#2
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #2
well i got mine for 218 delivered so yeah its not a bad deal.
 
0

04ShadowGT

New Member
Jan 31, 2004
112
0
0
Elizabethtown, KY
Sep 2, 2004
#3
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #3
Flows and ProChamber

I've heard nothing but awful things about Flows w/ an o/r X.
 
9

98BLKHRSE

New Member
Nov 30, 2003
40
0
0
Rochester, New York
Sep 2, 2004
#4
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #4
well i have flows, specifically the american thunder catback and i did have an o/r x pipe. And now i have Mac L/T headers and prochamber with the same flows and personally i cant decide which i like more. The car was diffently more raspy and louder through the lower end and screamed up high with the xpipe. I got tons of compliments on my setup and people asking what that setup was. But now with the headers and prochamber the car sounds more of a "big block" muscle car sound. there is no rasp and the car idles quieter. but when you get on it, it deffintely gets loud too. They say that x pipe offer more hp and h pipe (prochamber) offer more low end torque. If your looking to buy an o/r x pipe for your 98 let me know mine is only 6 months old and its an UPR x pipe.
 

Craig Mack

Busted Buffing the Bishop
Founding Member
Mar 9, 2002
801
0
0
Lake Mary, FL
Sep 2, 2004
#5
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #5
Prochamber will be noticably quieter, without the metallic rasp, and will be a little deeper. I love the X-pipe becuase its loud and it screams with the flows. Its deep yet the slight rasp makes it sound extremely p!ssed off.
 

Steve777

New Member
Jun 21, 2004
208
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Sep 2, 2004
#6
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #6
Flows with the O/R X sound great. Nice hollow, smooth sound that screams when you get on it. Prochamber and flows have a great tone, but they are quieter. I personally think the X is the best midpipe with flows IF you get the right brand.
 
S

spikeGT_99

New Member
May 3, 2004
184
0
0
Jackson, Ms
Sep 2, 2004
#7
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #7
mac claims more hp with the prochamber than with a traditional h,and imo it has a deeper, much better sound than any x. on a side note, out of curiosity has ANYONE done independent testing on any of these midpipes??? id like to see some hp #'s posted just to clarify the differences.
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Sep 2, 2004
#8
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #8
mustangtuning.com o/r xpipe w/ flows!!! if satan himself put exhaust on his stang, this is the combo he would go w/!!!!!
 
D

Dr GT

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
26
0
0
Spring Hill, FL
Sep 2, 2004
#9
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #9
i was thinking of getting bassani midi headers, bassani x-pipe and using the flowmaster exhaust i have now...how you think thatd sound?
 

madmatt

Ellis Juan sympathizer
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2002
465
0
16
Lexington, SC
Sep 2, 2004
#10
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #10
The only bad opinions on x pipes with flow combos I hear are the ones who used the BBK x pipe. The UPR, Mustangtuning, and Dr GAs all sound friggin demonic. I went with the prochamber because it sounds so great to me with the flows. Thats whatd Id go with because to me it sounds more muscle car like, but my next choice would be Dr Gas or mustangtuning X pipe. Good luck.
 

UofMfooTbaLL24

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
62
0
0
Michigan
Sep 2, 2004
#11
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #11
well now im starting to think that a prochamber might sound too quiet... I want more of a muscle car grunt to it, not a raspy let it scream 6 thousand rpm... could u hear me coming down the street w/ an O/R prochamber w/ flows shifting at just 2,500 rpm? anyone got sound clips? Thanks
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Sep 2, 2004
#12
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #12
Dr GT said:
i was thinking of getting bassani midi headers, bassani x-pipe and using the flowmaster exhaust i have now...how you think thatd sound?
Click to expand...

dont go w. the bassani xpipe. too much rasp and doesnt sound very good w/ flows. stay with the mustangtuning o/r xpipe, UPR, VRS, or Dr. Gas xpipe
 

BrightBlue00GT

I am even OLDER than Hawk!
Jun 22, 2000
2,906
0
47
Stationed in Korea
Sep 3, 2004
#13
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #13
UofMfooTbaLL24 said:
well now im starting to think that a prochamber might sound too quiet... I want more of a muscle car grunt to it, not a raspy let it scream 6 thousand rpm... could u hear me coming down the street w/ an O/R prochamber w/ flows shifting at just 2,500 rpm? anyone got sound clips? Thanks
Click to expand...
No no no, don't go thinking it's too quiet, the P/C is NOT that quiet, in fact quiet isn't really the right word to use in describing the different idle sound between an X and the P/C. It has a "lower" idle note, but that much and not for long. As soon as you get going, not even getting on it, just get going, it sounds mean, that big block type mean.

I ran the P/c with 2 chamber Flows way back when and it sounded great! I wanted, and got my old time sound (yea, I'm old).

Now I run the same P/C with a Steeda (Borla) SS catback, and it sounds even better. I have to idle down the short hill from my house out to the main road in the morning so I don't wake people.

Check out my website below for the Video Vault where I have a couple clips.
 
C

cadde300

New Member
Oct 7, 2003
91
0
0
Sep 3, 2004
#14
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #14
flows and the prochamber sound great...but....flows with the right x pipe sounds better. I know of two brands of x pipes that sound amazing with flows.....flowtech and dr. gas or spintech who get x pipes from dr. gas. these three x pipes have the x further forward, under the transmission, therefore sound amazing with flows...take my word for it. have heard all of them. flowtech x and flows sounds to good in my opinion
 

Black2001GT

Founding Member
Feb 12, 2001
1,267
0
36
Saints fan Stuck in FalCANTs country
Sep 3, 2004
#15
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #15
IMHO, Pro Chamber and Flows are the best sounding exhaust combination.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
755
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
SOLD For Sale 92 Mustang Notchback Complete Rebuild in 2019
  • pearlnotchback
  • Jun 21, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
9
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 24, 2021
Steel1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?