• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

PST good bad or ugly???

  • Thread starter Thread starter fastang
  • Start date Start date Aug 23, 2003

fastang

Founding Member
Jan 4, 2000
89
0
0
griswold,CT
Aug 23, 2003
#1
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #1
I just bought a 67 coupe and the front suspension needs some work...I was looking at the kit from PST that's on the back page of every car mag ever and also looking at the kit from mustangs plus that comes with botht the upper and lower control arms...I'm doing the install my self so exact fit is a big factor. Much more of a factor than money...Let me know what kind of luck you've had..Thanks...
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Aug 23, 2003
#2
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #2
I went with the kit in black poly, with springs and perches.
All parts were a sweet bolt in fit without using a BFH.
no complaints or squeeks.
 

fastang

Founding Member
Jan 4, 2000
89
0
0
griswold,CT
Aug 23, 2003
#3
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #3
From PST?
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Aug 23, 2003
#4
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #4
Yep, Have done the 68 cougar too.
 

BOSSMAN98

Founding Member
Dec 20, 2001
212
0
0
Kings Mountian, NC
Aug 23, 2003
#5
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #5
PST sells there kit as polygraphite, which is a fancy name for rubber. I would try to find a polyurathane kit. I installed a kit from PST about 5 years ago and they need to be replaced now.

just my .02 cent
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 23, 2003
#6
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #6
I did thePST front end kit on mine about 8 years ago. It's still good.
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Aug 23, 2003
#7
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #7
BOSSMAN98 said:
PST sells there kit as polygraphite, which is a fancy name for rubber. I would try to find a polyurathane kit. I installed a kit from PST about 5 years ago and they need to be replaced now.

just my .02 cent
Click to expand...
This is absolutely not correct... PST's stuff is graphite impregnated polyurethane, thus the name polygraphite. They claim the graphite functions to eliminate the usual squeaking of polyurethane, which it does seem to do.

I installed PST's polygraphite front suspension kit on my Mach in 1990, and proceeded to drive the car daily until '94ish, putting over 30k miles on it during that time. And recently when restoring the car, I was going to rebuild the suspension with PST's kit again. But when we pulled the suspension apart, none of the old PST stuff needed to be replaced. Everything was still in really good shape, with very minimal wear. We ended up using all of it again.

Overall, the PST bushings were probably made the biggest difference in the handling of the car and feel tight and firm. I recommend it.
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Aug 23, 2003
#8
  • Aug 23, 2003
  • #8
I agree with DarkB, Have 35k on the cougar sence 96 and not one problem. Hadles great and no squeeks.
 

BOSSMAN98

Founding Member
Dec 20, 2001
212
0
0
Kings Mountian, NC
Aug 24, 2003
#9
  • Aug 24, 2003
  • #9
DarkBuddha said:
This is absolutely not correct... PST's stuff is graphite impregnated polyurethane, thus the name polygraphite. They claim the graphite functions to eliminate the usual squeaking of polyurethane, which it does seem to do.

I installed PST's polygraphite front suspension kit on my Mach in 1990, and proceeded to drive the car daily until '94ish, putting over 30k miles on it during that time. And recently when restoring the car, I was going to rebuild the suspension with PST's kit again. But when we pulled the suspension apart, none of the old PST stuff needed to be replaced. Everything was still in really good shape, with very minimal wear. We ended up using all of it again.

Overall, the PST bushings were probably made the biggest difference in the handling of the car and feel tight and firm. I recommend it.
Click to expand...

DarkBuddha. Please go back and reread the PST web site. It does not say that it is polyurathane injected with graphite. It just states a bushing injected with graphite the has polyurathane like characteristics. I'm just stating the problems that I have had on my car. I think it great that other people have had good luck with them. In my case I switch to polyurathane bushings and have gotten better handling from my cars. If anyone has any questions about my coments on this subject be go to www.p-s-t.com/poly.html
 

kslushy

Founding Member
Jan 25, 2002
1,125
0
37
Aug 24, 2003
#10
  • Aug 24, 2003
  • #10
the pst website also says they carry a 20 year warranty, so your still covered....
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Aug 24, 2003
#11
  • Aug 24, 2003
  • #11
BOSSMAN98 said:
DarkBuddha. Please go back and reread the PST web site. It does not say that it is polyurathane injected with graphite. It just states a bushing injected with graphite the has polyurathane like characteristics. I'm just stating the problems that I have had on my car. I think it great that other people have had good luck with them. In my case I switch to polyurathane bushings and have gotten better handling from my cars. If anyone has any questions about my coments on this subject be go to www.p-s-t.com/poly.html
Click to expand...
As I recall, PST informed me that the bushings were polyurethane based. That said, you are correct that the website does not indicate that they are indeed polyurethane, but nor does it indicate that they are rubber as you said. From the PST site:
PST's website said:
After years of development, PST introduced POLYGRAPHITE®, a graphite-impregnated high performance bushing designed for street, strip or track driven cars. Now all cars can have the road handling characteristics of polyurethane bushings with virtually no deflection and the self-lubricating qualities of graphite.
Click to expand...
BTW, they've up'd their warranty too... Lifetime!!! Check it: http://www.p-s-t.com/war.html
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Aug 24, 2003
#12
  • Aug 24, 2003
  • #12
Dam, If I knew that they were that bad,
Did I Put a Complete Frontend from Them.
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Aug 24, 2003
#13
  • Aug 24, 2003
  • #13
Dam, If I knew that they were that bad,
Did I Put a Complete Frontend from Them on My Mach1.
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Aug 25, 2003
#14
  • Aug 25, 2003
  • #14
PST does also make rebuild kits with the rubber bushings for the people that don't want the harshness of the polyurethane. Maybe that's what you were thinking of.
 

foghorn67

I'll save you the time and choke myself
Founding Member
Jan 10, 2002
1,532
0
46
Orange County, CA
Dec 23, 2003
#15
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #15
I have put three years of hard miles and commuting on my 67 with a pst front end kit. works wonderful and drives better then new.
no way this stuff is your trypical "rubber". rubber deflects waaay to much for this control.
now the only two bushings I haven't replaced, squeek like hell.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 23, 2003
#16
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #16
PST kits

BOSSMAN98 said:
DarkBuddha. Please go back and reread the PST web site. It does not say that it is polyurathane injected with graphite. It just states a bushing injected with graphite the has polyurathane like characteristics. I'm just stating the problems that I have had on my car. I think it great that other people have had good luck with them. In my case I switch to polyurathane bushings and have gotten better handling from my cars. If anyone has any questions about my coments on this subject be go to www.p-s-t.com/poly.html
Click to expand...

We've been selling these kits for about 5 years now...

However, they have a rubber line and a polyurethane line. The polyurethane is just a fancy trademarked name for graphite impregnated urethane. DB is correct!

The kits are a great price alternative and are inclusive. As a distributor, I have personally found their CS department difficult to work with at times even though they offer a good warranty on the front side.

Their control arms are imported so the integrity of the metal is fair. It's relative to the cost...

Even though they are graphite impregnated, you still need to grease the contact points on install or they will squeak. I suggest a silicone based grease...
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Dec 23, 2003
#17
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #17
I am putting the Mustangs Plus kit in my 67. I have not finished yet, but everything seems to be of high quality and the price was right. They will help you stay in a budget.
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Dec 24, 2003
#18
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #18
mdjay said:
However, they have a rubber line and a polyurethane line. The polyurethane is just a fancy trademarked name for graphite impregnated urethane. DB is correct!
Click to expand...
Does this mean I've earned a banana dance??? Ah, heck with it, I'm doin' it either way...
 

pabear89

Active Member
Apr 15, 2003
2,126
0
46
High in the Hills of So Ca with the Voices in My H
Dec 24, 2003
#19
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #19
DarkBuddha said:
Does this mean I've earned a banana dance??? Ah, heck with it, I'm doin' it either way...
Click to expand...


Easy or you'll have a banna split.

Yea I checked the recipet on mine and it's the graphphite impregnated one.
And No squeeks at all.

PB
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Suspension Foxbody ride height change after installing new control arms
  • Mhalc1
  • Jan 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 10, 2024
Mhalc1
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?