• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Question about CR and heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter str8stang036
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2004

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Jan 18, 2004
#1
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #1
I have been looking at low compression pistons for a 351w project I want to start. When I look at the CR for the pistons its also dependent on the size of the CC of the head. For example: 9.06CR for a 63CC head.

My question is does the CR go up or down dependig on the size of the chamber? What else determines the CR going up or down?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jan 18, 2004
#2
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #2
Smaller combustion chambers increase compression. Also, the block has an effect on compression depending how much "in the hole" the piston is. 0 decking makes the piston flat w/ the block deck. Head gasket thickness has an effect also.

Mike
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jan 18, 2004
#3
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #3
If you are at a really high elevation, your compression ratio will be changed slighty changed as well.

Joe
 

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Jan 18, 2004
#4
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #4
So I am guessing that headgaskets lower the CR, since it pushes the head off of the block slightly. Making a bigger combustion chamber right? And the more "in the hole" the piston is the lower the CR?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jan 18, 2004
#5
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #5
The thickness of the headgasket would determine the compression ratio. Some companies measure CR's with an .037 and some use like a .042 headgasket. So the thicker the headgasket, the higher the number, and the higher the number, the lower the compression ratio. Your also right about deckheight and piston clearance. If the piston comes .005 from the top of the deck, still in the cylinder, it will have a lower compression ratio than if it were .005 out of the hole. Basically, on an N/A motor, the closer the piston comes to the top of the combustion chamber, the higher the compression ratio.

Joe
 

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Jan 19, 2004
#6
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #6
Thanks guys for the reply. Its help me understand CR a little better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
698
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Progress Thread 351w Build, 67 Coupe
  • redstang67
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
337
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2024
89ripper
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
425
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
539
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?