• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Question for 69-70 351w mustang guys

  • Thread starter Thread starter PMRacing
  • Start date Start date Jul 15, 2007
P

PMRacing

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
41
0
0
Maryland
Jul 15, 2007
#1
  • Jul 15, 2007
  • #1
I have a 70 mustang that i am switchig from a 302 to 351w, and using the same mounts (i think they used to both use the same mounts anyways, not sure). I was wondering if any of you are running any single manifold intake with the stock hood (no hood scoups). Looking to choose between, torker II, victor jr, or super victor. I have to use a single manifold cause i am runningn a TT blow through set up (my 302 couldn't take much power). If you can tell me what intake you can fit, with what height air cleaner, it would be really help full....
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 15, 2007
#2
  • Jul 15, 2007
  • #2
The Torker for the Windsor is stock height.
If you are using a power adder, the mild nature of the intake will not hurt things.
The other intakes are significantly taller.

BTW:
289/302/351c/351w all use same mounts, trannys, pulleys, and most other accessories can convert or be converted easily.
 
P

PMRacing

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
41
0
0
Maryland
Jul 16, 2007
#3
  • Jul 16, 2007
  • #3
ratio411 said:
The Torker for the Windsor is stock height.
If you are using a power adder, the mild nature of the intake will not hurt things.
The other intakes are significantly taller.

BTW:
289/302/351c/351w all use same mounts, trannys, pulleys, and most other accessories can convert or be converted easily.
Click to expand...

Thanks that is good to know, i know that the vict jr is 1.5 inches taller than the torker, and the super victor is 2 inches taller. I guess what i am trying to ask is, how much more room does a 70 mustang with 351 have between the carb and bottom of hood.

Furthermore, I know that the intake wouldn't hurt things on power adder applications, however, it does cause more fuel "puddeling" that the other two don't have problems with when you add boost to the mix.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
491
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
M
Gifted a Junk 1976 Mustang II with plans for a radical conversion!
  • MXGerry
  • Apr 29, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 12, 2026
MXGerry
M
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Monday at 2:12 PM
mattcrp1
M
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
398
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?