• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Question on S-281's motor...

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScortLX
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2009

ScortLX

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2001
261
0
16
Parker, Colorado
Jan 2, 2009
#1
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • #1
I'm doing the "how much power can a stock shortblock handle" thought process since I have begun looking at getting a KB in the next few years. My question is, the '99-'04 S-281's with the Saleen blower were rated at around 450 hp right? They didn't touch the motors on those did they? Or did they swap the rods out? What kind of boost numbers what that with usually? I really should know this stuff, but I needed to ask. Thanks!
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jan 2, 2009
#2
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • #2
saleen blowers RARELY break 35--370 to the wheels even with swapped pullies and other supporting mods. they were FAR from 450. the blowers are not very efficient.

they have the same bottom end as every other 2V. the SAFE limit is around 425 rwhp.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jan 2, 2009
#3
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • #3
i believe they made 8 psi stock
 

Slow35th

New Member
Dec 14, 2008
37
1
0
Jan 2, 2009
#4
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • #4
450 horspower at the crank
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 2, 2009
#5
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • #5
The cars made 285hp/320tq stock.

Like SaleenGT said the blowers were very weak.

Do you own a Saleen from you avatar it doesn't look like a Saleen?
 

ScortLX

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2001
261
0
16
Parker, Colorado
Jan 2, 2009
#6
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • #6
04YELLOWGT said:
The cars made 285hp/320tq stock.

Like SaleenGT said the blowers were very weak.

Do you own a Saleen from you avatar it doesn't look like a Saleen?
Click to expand...

Nah...no Saleen here. I'm just doing more research than is necessary on how much power the stock bottom end can handle. I figured a good place to start would be a "factory warranty" covered vehicle like the supercharged S-281 since it has the stock GT motor in it. I figured the bottom end could hold at least how much the S-281 put out rwhp wise since its covered by a warranty still. I know...I'm weird. When I ever do it...I'll keep it tuned to 375-380 or so with the KB.

I knew it was 450 rated from Saleen at the crank, but I was curious about any internal upgrades that were done to it to support that (if at all) Which now I know nothing was done to the motor.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 2, 2009
#7
  • Jan 2, 2009
  • #7
ScortLX said:
When I ever do it...I'll keep it tuned to 375-380 or so with the KB.
Click to expand...

375-380rwhp is right about where the base intecooled kit will get ya...about 9-10psi.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 3, 2009
#8
  • Jan 3, 2009
  • #8
ScortLX said:
I knew it was 450 rated from Saleen at the crank, but I was curious about any internal upgrades that were done to it to support that (if at all) Which now I know nothing was done to the motor.
Click to expand...

The cars were not rated at 450hp at the crank. THe numbers I posted earlier are what they were rated at. The Saleen E was rated at 425hp at the crank but that was with a built motor.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 3, 2009
#9
  • Jan 3, 2009
  • #9
04YELLOWGT said:
The cars were not rated at 450hp at the crank. THe numbers I posted earlier are what they were rated at. The Saleen E was rated at 425hp at the crank but that was with a built motor.
Click to expand...
And it was also huffing a 2300AX Twin Screw, not an Eaton M90.
 

ScortLX

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2001
261
0
16
Parker, Colorado
Jan 4, 2009
#10
  • Jan 4, 2009
  • #10
04YELLOWGT said:
The cars were not rated at 450hp at the crank. THe numbers I posted earlier are what they were rated at. The Saleen E was rated at 425hp at the crank but that was with a built motor.
Click to expand...

Yeah...sorry on that one. You're right brother
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
695
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
794
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
667
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Hello from California - Fox Body
  • gkomo
  • Aug 2, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
16
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Sep 25, 2024
SoulN
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?