• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Quick help 302 pistons in a 306???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam95GT
  • Start date Start date Mar 16, 2007

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Mar 16, 2007
#1
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #1
Im about to buy a complete engine for my car the guy said that its a 306 thats just been freshened with the bottom end of a 92 302 with forged pistons with bigger rings to fit the 306.... has anyone ever heard of someone doing this???
 

Prime Lord

Crappy Default Title
Founding Member
Sep 19, 2000
2,137
199
114
Denver-ish
Mar 16, 2007
#2
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #2
I've never heard of that. When I did my 306 in my old stang, I HAD to get .040 over pistons
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Mar 16, 2007
#3
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #3
no....and i wouldnt do it! What makes a 306 a 306 is the piston size!
 

U2SLO450

Member
May 27, 2006
118
0
16
Mar 16, 2007
#4
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #4
302 + 30 over= 306
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Mar 16, 2007
#5
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #5
Surely you misunderstood him... I doubt anyone would be that ummmm


retarded


I'd call him again man. Did he sleeve it?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 16, 2007
#6
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #6
Isn't there a slightly longer stroke you can get with different rods and technically end up with the same cubes? I'm not sure on this but it seems like i read it somewhere....they called it a long stroke 302..
 

Blandnuts

I don't swallow; I only swoosh
Founding Member
Aug 21, 2000
1,172
124
124
FloorDuh
Mar 16, 2007
#7
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #7
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Isn't there a slightly longer stroke you can get with different rods and technically end up with the same cubes? I'm not sure on this but it seems like i read it somewhere....they called it a long stroke 302..
Click to expand...

I think you might be talking about flipping the rods, or maybe it was using 289 rods....
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 16, 2007
#8
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #8
Blandnuts said:
I think you might be talking about flipping the rods, or maybe it was using 289 rods....
Click to expand...


It's definitely something old school i'm thinking of....maybe 351 rods...i'm not sure. In theory more stroke equals more cubes but i'm not even totally sure if there's enough cylinder to do it...i don't know much about it aside from a vague memory of reading about it.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 16, 2007
#9
  • Mar 16, 2007
  • #9
ive heard of the term "boring loose" where you throw a slightly smaller piston in that the bore, or bore your cyl out a small bit larger than your piston. not sure on the number, maybe .010-.020" difference.
theory is that it will make the engine rev up faster.

while i am sure it has oil burning problems problems and wears pistons and cyls much faster than normal. for a hardcore racer that has the engine out and apart alot refreshing it and buying new parts. i could see it happening.

the hardcore racers do lots of small things to gain the edge...

i duno if this happens alot but i have heard of it.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Mar 17, 2007
#10
  • Mar 17, 2007
  • #10
The 306 is a 302 with a .030 overbore. The crank, and rods are the same, the pistons and rings are .030 larger. There never has been a 306 that became a 306 by any other method other than boring it .030 oversize. Grinding the crankpins offset to achieve a 4 cubic inch gain isn't worth the effort. You would need a very odd sized rod bearing to get the correct bearing clearances.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Mar 17, 2007
#11
  • Mar 17, 2007
  • #11
Alright guys i just talked to the kid and he talked to his brother who had the work done... and he said that it was honed not bored.... and they put in new rings and bearings.... so i guess that means its still a 302 which is cool.... now do you guys think this is an ok deal???? its basically the engine trick flow heads , an e cam, 1.6 rockers... new waterpump. energy suspension mounts. new oil pump... motor was fressioned with new rings and bearings... hardened push rods. and all accessories off of a 94/95 cobra... $1200 without an intake manifold... but he has a eld vic jr manifold i can pick up from him.... im gonna see if since its a 302 if i can trade my explorer manifold and 1200 for the complete motor
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Mar 17, 2007
#12
  • Mar 17, 2007
  • #12
anyone???? im leaving in like 20 minutes... also ive read up on clearence problems after a hone??? how common is this issue.. thanks guys
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 17, 2007
#13
  • Mar 17, 2007
  • #13
Heres a good test I did...

Bone Stock bottem end with 100K: 265rwhp / 308rwtq

Honed Stock bottem end rerung: 272 rwhp / 316 rwtq

Not worth a lot but worth something. The motor when it was in my car (its back in there now) did not burn oil or use anymore than it ever did. I did this because of fuel wash and nasty looking cylinder walls, but some racers do it for that extra kick!
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Mar 17, 2007
#14
  • Mar 17, 2007
  • #14
im doing it because my stock has 212k and a little bit of ping lol... but the bottom end was freshened so it seems like a good deal
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
736
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?