• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

radiators

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobain03
  • Start date Start date Jun 28, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Jun 28, 2006
#1
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #1
ok, i running hot so im gonna buy a new radiator. i can get a 4 row copper for 200 bucks that will fit the car.

how does a 4 core copper stand up to a 2 or 3 row aluminum?
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jun 28, 2006
#2
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #2
Two things:
1) copper doesn't transfer heat as well as aluminum and
2) there are diminishing returns for each additional row you add
The last means that the fourth row is removing less heat than the third, the third less than the second, etc., so adding rows, at some point, will have little effect.
If you have a medium performance engine, a 3- or 4-row copper should be fine, especially if you have a good shroud and a fan that pulls good air.
What year car? Oh, sorry, didn't see your sig. This should be esp. applicaable to 65-66 cars.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jun 28, 2006
#3
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #3
I wont sell you my 2 row Be-Cool for a good price plus shipping, PM me
 

AdamInChains

Member
Apr 22, 2006
128
0
16
Jun 28, 2006
#4
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #4
i thought i heard that copper actually transfers heat Better than aluminum. Aluminum just adds the benefit of better shaped designs. Could be wrong though
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Jun 28, 2006
#5
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #5
aluminum will cool better than copper.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Jun 28, 2006
#6
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #6
I upgraded to a 4 row copper 6 years ago, but can't say how much better it is because I didn't drive it in the summer with the 2 row and the AC condenser in front of it.

I am planning on putting the biggest crossflow aluminum radiator I can fit, because the 4 row copper can't keep it cool with the AC on.
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Jun 28, 2006
#7
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #7
My three row copper does just fine in the hottest rush hour traffic (it was 32C here the other day). Just be sure to make or buy an overflow (AKA catch-can) or every day you will short a little more coolant.
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Jun 28, 2006
#8
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #8
once i hit about 195 or 200, my engine starts to stumble. idle gets rough, so i have to keep the foot on the brake and give it gas to get it going.
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Jun 28, 2006
#9
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #9
copper does theoretically ***transfer heat*** a WHOLE lot better than aluminium. problem is that in a radiator it doesn't have enough time to. Copper is much better for small scale things like computers, aluminium will give you the better bang for the buck esp because it is only like 1000000 lbs lighter than a Cu core. get a nice 2-3 row aluminium one, i got a 3 row aluminium rad, and aside from the crappy mech fan i have it keeps it cool right up to the waiting in 100 degree heat not moving for 20 minutes. !!! i'de look into moving the battery tray and going for a wide rad personally.
 
C

Credzba

Member
Jul 11, 2004
37
0
6
Jun 28, 2006
#10
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #10
I spent over a year trying to keep my 66 cool

I had a 289 bored 60 over, and I never could keep it cool.
I tried 4 core copper.
I tried 2 core aluminum.

Heres sumary of what I learned.
aluminum as a conductor of heat is not as good as copper.
The heat transfer though is more dependant on the surface are of the pipe used in the core than it is on the metal type.

A 2 core aluminum transfers heat better than a 4 core copper only because the diameter of the core pipe has to be kept small on copper or it will split. The aluminum core uses larger pipe becaue the aluminum can hold the stress without bursting. So the larger diameter aluminum gives the same (or more) surface area as the 4 core copper, thus it can dissipate the heat from your engine better.

Single most important lesson I learned though .. The material or number of cores is almost irrelevent compared to cutting that hole bigger and putting a 390 radiator in.

After I had spent over a year trying to keep my engine cool, had finally warped my 289 block, I spent an hour cutting the hole bigger and putting in 1968 radiator mounts and a 390 radiator.
End result is my 347 stroker now runs perfect temperature in 100 degree Texas summers.

Don't waste your time on more cores, aluminum, water wetter, all that junk, I tried it all, byte the bullet, put in a bigger radiator.
 
6

67scodegt

New Member
Feb 18, 2006
12
0
0
Jun 28, 2006
#11
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #11
Copper does transfer heat more efficiently than aluminum. It's the rigid aluminum that allows the use of a larger tube and a larger, fin to tube contact surface that makes the aluminum radiator transfer heat better. John
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jun 29, 2006
#12
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #12
Cobain03: do you have an electric fan?
 

AdamInChains

Member
Apr 22, 2006
128
0
16
Jun 29, 2006
#13
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #13
electric fan would help alot. it will cool much better and you'll gain a little power by taking it off the motor
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Jun 29, 2006
#14
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #14
That's not what I was getting at. If you have an electric fan with a thermostat on/off, then the fan will switch in when the car gets hot (195-200* is about right). That, in turn, can draw a lot of current from your alternator. When that happens in my car, the extra load on the alternator draws my idle down 100-200 RPM. I was thinking that that might be Cobain's problem. If so, set the idle up 100-200 RPM to compensate. If you don't run an electric fan, then ... nevermind.
 

stangkid88

New Member
Nov 11, 2005
112
0
0
Seattle area
Jun 29, 2006
#15
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #15
I'm running a four core copper rad. which the previous owner put in and I have never had any overheating problems. However, I have a mostly stock 289 and a flex-a-lite fan with shroud and if I were to do it again I would opt for an aluminum, both for looks and better cooling capacity.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jun 29, 2006
#16
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #16
everytime i hear of a car running warm, it always has a common factor, using a electric fan..including mine. All my buddies with strokers and belt driven fans have less problems
 

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Jun 29, 2006
#17
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #17
nevermind, I need to start a new thread
 

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
Jun 29, 2006
#18
  • Jun 29, 2006
  • #18
Wow, lots of different answers. I think some of this has to do with no one Mustang is the same as the next. There can be many different causes for your motor over heating that have nothing to do with the radiator. For instance, I've heard that if you over bore your block, making the walls too thin, you will most certainly have cooling issues. Also, your coolant passages on our 40 year old blocks could be restricted. Your water pump may not be pumping enough water. Heck even a worn out therostat and bad radiator cap could cause over heating. Not to mention old coolant.

The point I'm trying to make is that you have to look at your entire cooling system not just the radiator. I think everyone kind of made that point when some stated 3 core works great, Brass 4 core is best, Aluminum is better...etc. My personal opinion is to check how well your block is flowing coolant. Next check out your water pump and ensure it's pumping lots of coolant. Replace your thermostat with a 180*, a new 13lb cap, and fresh coolant mixed properly. Make sure you have a shroud or an electric fan on your radiator. You need a overflow catch of some sort to ensure you don't run low on coolant.
After all that has been checked and fixed if you still have a problem then I would suggest a good aluminum radiator like a Griffin. I suggest aluminum because there's a good reason modern cars don't run copper radiators any more, and it's not because they're heavier...they don't cool as well as an aluminum.

There's my 5 cents
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Jun 30, 2006
#19
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #19
the motor was rebuilt this year, so the block should be flowing good. waterpump is a couple of years old.

im gonna bite the bullitt and buy a 4 core copper and a stock fan shroud (i have a home made one now) and throw on a steel 5 or 6 blade fan (flex fan there now). gonna pull the electric fan (pusher) and put it up and put a catch can somewhere.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Jun 30, 2006
#20
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #20
Cobain03 said:
the motor was rebuilt this year, so the block should be flowing good. waterpump is a couple of years old.

im gonna bite the bullitt and buy a 4 core copper and a stock fan shroud (i have a home made one now) and throw on a steel 5 or 6 blade fan (flex fan there now). gonna pull the electric fan (pusher) and put it up and put a catch can somewhere.
Click to expand...

Although your setup might work, you would be happier if you increased radiator width for more air flow.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
Engine Radiator with no shroud provision... What to do?
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
591
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
FastDriver
H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
431
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?