• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Random Tire Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter stng
  • Start date Start date Jan 9, 2006
S

stng

New Member
Jul 27, 2005
182
0
0
Jan 9, 2006
#1
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #1
So I have a question for you guys about tire sidewall height. I have been looking at other peoples rides and I am noticing that a lot of guys go with a SHORTER side wall height on the REAR tires? Example 245/40/ZR17 on the front and 255/35/ZR17 on the rear. Why would someone do this? Woudnt it make the front of the car higher than the rear? It would seem to me that you would want it the other way around?

Thanks in Advance

Don
 

wannabe2000GT

New Member
Nov 9, 2004
138
1
0
upstate, ny
Jan 9, 2006
#2
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #2
it gives it a better rake so that the back is a tad higher than the front giving it the old school muscle car look. thats how mines setup
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Jan 9, 2006
#3
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #3
well i run 245/45/17 out front stock size on a 17" rim
and 275/40/17 out rear on the stock rim ................but the overall diameter is close it is only off by a couple tenth of an inch like .05-.10 or so, the reason is the tire is bigger so with a 275 with a 40%(275/40) profile would be the same or close a 245 with a 45%(245/45) profile but it be wider giving it a better look
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Jan 9, 2006
#4
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #4
the wider the tire, regardless of the sidewall height, will be taller
 

triggz

Founding Member
May 15, 2002
1,218
0
37
Gadsden, AL
Jan 9, 2006
#5
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #5
tomustang said:
the wider the tire, regardless of the sidewall height, will be taller
Click to expand...

That's incorrect, and simply not how tire sizing works.

a 245/45/17 tire is 25.68"
a 275/40/17 tire is 25.66" - significantly wider, yet slightly shorter.


stng, the reason you see a different, lower aspect ratio (middle #, the % of width that the tire will have in sidewall height) for the rear is because many people run a bigger tire out back. when the tire width (first #) increases, the aspect ratio must decrease to retain original overall tire height.
 

Malevolyn

New Member
Dec 7, 2005
18
0
0
Lakeland, FL
Jan 9, 2006
#6
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #6
I'd like to point out that, at least on my car and most SN95 Mustangs (V8, at least) I've seen, the rear is already higher.
 
S

stng

New Member
Jul 27, 2005
182
0
0
Jan 9, 2006
#7
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #7
Thank You all very much... I have been wondering about that for a while but didnt want to look stupid by asking...
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Jan 9, 2006
#8
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #8
triggz said:
That's incorrect, and simply not how tire sizing works.

a 245/45/17 tire is 25.68"
a 275/40/17 tire is 25.66" - significantly wider, yet slightly shorter.
Click to expand...
ah, didn't see the different aspect ratios
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 9, 2006
#9
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #9
triggz said:
That's incorrect, and simply not how tire sizing works.

a 245/45/17 tire is 25.68"
a 275/40/17 tire is 25.66" - significantly wider, yet slightly shorter.


stng, the reason you see a different, lower aspect ratio (middle #, the % of width that the tire will have in sidewall height) for the rear is because many people run a bigger tire out back. when the tire width (first #) increases, the aspect ratio must decrease to retain original overall tire height.
Click to expand...
This is the correct answer. Multiply the tire width by the aspect ratio to determine the sidewall height (in milimeters). Divide answer by 25.4 to get inches.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
127
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
362
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
H
Best tire size for 91 Fox 18x9 wheels. On coilovers
  • hassler
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
437
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
KRUISR
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
524
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
B
Tire size question 1986 gt hatchback
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 12, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
608
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
B0udreaux
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?