• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

rear spring isolators

  • Thread starter Thread starter pudman
  • Start date Start date Aug 29, 2008

pudman

Member
May 31, 2008
109
0
16
tujunga,ca
Aug 29, 2008
#1
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #1
i just installed urethane rear spring isolators on my 86 gt vert with FMRP "c" springs. now the backend sits 3/4 -1 inch higher. did i miss something on the installation? it should only have raised it maybe 1/4 - 3/8 of an inch.
 

wildstang90

New Member
Nov 24, 2004
87
0
0
Bristol, TN
Aug 29, 2008
#2
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #2
make sure the ends of the springs are pointed I think to the driver side of the car. I did this early spring and had them 180 out and it jacked up the car alot.
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Aug 29, 2008
#3
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #3
Like Wildstang90 said. It's likely that the springs are not seated correctly.

On a vert, even with new poly isolators, with FRPP C springs, you should have 3/4+" or more drop from the factory spec'd height.

If the old isolators were worn, that could drop the rear by ~1/4"->1/3+" from the car's factory new height. I'm not sure what the factory spec height is for a vert. But, it's at least 27" at the fenders. It may be 27-1/2" or more.

FWIW: I don't like the FRPP C springs. I like them even less on a heavy *ss vert. If you're doing the drop just for looks, that's fine.

Hoeever, if you're looking for better handling, the FRPP C annd B springs are a joke. The drop is too great, and many suspension parameters get screwed up when the Fox/sn95 are dropped more than ~1" from the GT hieght. For a vert, for handling, I'd suggest at most, the Bullitt or Mach1 springs with poly isolators. Or, Mach1 springs with rubber isolators.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,157
17,849
224
Massachusetts
Aug 29, 2008
#4
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #4
C springs are meh. The rake is good and it handles okay on perfectly smooth roads, but it rides like a brick and you better pray if you ever hit a bump in a hard turn.


I'll be replacing mine at some point with a better spring setup matched to my tokicos
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Aug 29, 2008
#5
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #5
It depends if a person wants handling or looks. The GT springs are stiff as they are. For handling, you can not lower the car at all, unless you increase the spring rate. The stock GT height is boarder-line too low as it is for the spring rate.

For pure handling, people don't want a drop of more than ~3/4" and rate of at least 750. Of course, I'm talking about a non-modified k-frame, FCA, etc.


The struts and shocks make a massive difference. People can't just go to a stiffer spring rate and hope that some POS KYB or Monroe struts or shocks do anything.

I had the fixed-rate Toks before - much better than stock! I now have adj Toks to better match my Mach1 springs. Still, dual adjustable Koni or Bilsteins are much better (also cost much more!) than my adj Toks.

A Ford Fusion or an S197 have much better handling and tons more comfort. Of course, it's a suspension design from scratch that's over 20 years newer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Electrical 91 hatch wiring help needed
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 7, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
128
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 8, 2026
FastDriver
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
241
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
S
New misfire after replacing valve seals/springs.
  • SpeedofDarkness
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
172
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2025
SpeedofDarkness
S
Suspension Rear driver side sits lower than rear passenger side...?
  • 91GTstroked
  • May 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 18, 2024
91GTstroked
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?