• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Rear Spring Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter T0rk3d
  • Start date Start date Dec 22, 2007
T

T0rk3d

New Member
Aug 1, 2007
45
0
0
Dec 22, 2007
#1
  • Dec 22, 2007
  • #1
Hey guys. Got a great deal on some pro kits. The fronts are for my car, Problem is the rears are these

http://www.stangsuspension.com/store/comersus_viewitem.asp?idproduct=1344

And I have a 94 GT Coupe. I plan on getting MM adjustable rear lower control arms. So too to worried about the height if there is an issue there. But Are these gonna be softer or stiffer than the ones for the 94 GT coupe or the same? Im sure something is different because its for a vert fox and I have a coupe sn..... Really lost. I cant ever get ahold of Eibach. Please Let me know what you guys think. Thanks!
 

SublimeRT

Member
Jan 25, 2003
230
1
16
Clarksville, TN
Dec 23, 2007
#2
  • Dec 23, 2007
  • #2
I know that with production springs the convertible ones are softer than the coupes because the chassis is less rigid. The same might apply to the Eibachs, not sure. I know there's a chart that I've seen on here with spring rates for all kinds of different springs. Also I know a lot of people have used stock fox 4 cylinder front springs and fox V8 rears for drag racing; I've used fox fronts before in an '03 Mustang with no problems. So they might work.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Dec 23, 2007
#3
  • Dec 23, 2007
  • #3
Interesting. I'd have guessed the rears on a vert would have a greater rate because the verts are more portly.
 
T

T0rk3d

New Member
Aug 1, 2007
45
0
0
Dec 23, 2007
#4
  • Dec 23, 2007
  • #4
Well you dont think they will be any softer then say Sportlines would you? Here is the chart I think you were looking at. http://www.stangsuspension.com/store/springratesarticle.asp
It doesnt have the rates for coupes vs verts on the eibach pro kit. The only thing im worried about is that they are going to sit WAY too low or they are going to be insanely soft. I wont mind if they are soft enough to make me hook better lol. Not sure what is too soft though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
After a decade, I am no longer Stangless!
  • Jsmiley
  • May 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2024
manicmechanic007
L
Torsen T2R (M-4204-T31H), excessive play?
  • letumeternum
  • Aug 24, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 24, 2023
letumeternum
L
SOLD MM coil overs, koni struts, qa1 rears, h&r rear springs and more in NJ
  • 2000xp8
  • Mar 15, 2023
  • Suspension Parts
Replies
3
Views
2K
Suspension Parts Mar 20, 2023
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?