• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

rearend swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlangholzj
  • Start date Start date Mar 11, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
A

ajfriz

New Member
Sep 26, 2008
18
0
0
Mar 15, 2010
#21
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #21
jlangholzj said:
let me know how it goes!!! I'm planning on doing this now, out of curiosity, how much did you get yours for?? granted I'll have to prolly pay for if i go directly with a 5 lug, but you never know
Click to expand...

I bought a complete 1990 ex highway patrol car for $350 and it had a low mileage 5.0, 5 speed, and this rear. I'm in the process of installing everything in my car before it goes to the paint shop.

lord_cobra said:
Cool. I think that would definitely be the easist swap. Unless the Explorer pumpkin isn't actually offset. I can't tell from the picture. If it is not offset and does not require shortening then that would be the best swap because of the gearing and the disk brakes.

Also I thought that I read somewhere on here that for the fox body swap to 5-lug axles you could use the shorter axles from the rangers or explorers, I could be wrong though.
Click to expand...

The explorer rear is definitely offset and can cause problems. There are some people getting vibration at high speed as well as clearance issues with the tunnel if they haven't shortened the one side.

Personally I would just build a fox 8.8 even though the prices of the explorer rear ends are so tempting since you get 5 lug axles, disc brakes, and usually a limited slip. The cost of doing it right and shortening one side and getting a new shaft make it so it really isn't cost effective since you can do a 5 lug swap for super cheap with the fox axle by using ranger or aerostar shafts. If you want a little wider axle, you can use sn95 shafts and disc brakes for super cheap. I see those "kits" all the time on ebay for under $200.
 
L

lord_cobra

Member
Sep 2, 2005
96
6
9
Mar 16, 2010
#22
  • Mar 16, 2010
  • #22
Thanks for the great info. Hopefully the OP got what he needed too.
 
6

64/2stang

Member
Oct 30, 2009
22
0
6
Mar 16, 2010
#23
  • Mar 16, 2010
  • #23
here is a recent write up on shortning an exploder into a 65 stang with pics.http://www.advancedautorepairsonline...ions 8.8.htm
 
L

lord_cobra

Member
Sep 2, 2005
96
6
9
Mar 17, 2010
#24
  • Mar 17, 2010
  • #24
Can you check that link? It does not work because of the ... between online and ions.
 
N

nugget68

Member
Sep 26, 2005
362
3
19
Mar 17, 2010
#25
  • Mar 17, 2010
  • #25
Restorations 8.8
 
6

64/2stang

Member
Oct 30, 2009
22
0
6
Mar 17, 2010
#26
  • Mar 17, 2010
  • #26
nugget68 said:
Restorations 8.8
Click to expand...

thats the one. sorry i shouldve checked before i posted.
 
L

lord_cobra

Member
Sep 2, 2005
96
6
9
Mar 18, 2010
#27
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • #27
That really doesn't look that bad. I think it would be more beneficial than fixing up an old open 8".
 
6

64/2stang

Member
Oct 30, 2009
22
0
6
Mar 18, 2010
#28
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • #28
Looks somewhat easy, maybe gotta hit up the cash for clunker cars. hopefully find 1 complete w/ e-brake and another short axle,
 

armand67Fstback

Member
Oct 30, 2007
146
1
19
Mar 18, 2010
#29
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • #29
2002 Explorer Rear Axle for a 67 Mustang?

I've read here of using an 8.8 rear axle from a 1996 Explorer. What about a 2002, is that also an 8.8 that will work? I found a 2002 explorer on Craigslist that will be parted out near where I live. If anyone knows please let me know, thanks.
 

michaelg10

15 Year Member
Jan 13, 2009
11
2
13
May 25, 2010
#30
  • May 25, 2010
  • #30
I just got mine back from my welder. It was a 31 spline 8.8 out of a 96 Exploder with discs and 373 posi.

Recommend the following:
1. Weld the axle tubes to the center pumpkin (stronger than factory plug welds)
2. Narrow drivers side tube to center the pumpkin in the tunnel; use 2 passenger side axle shafts
3. Reverse the perches 43" apart (for a 67 Mustang)
4. New Bearings and Seals
5. Plan to add a LBW girdle

Still have to rebuild the parking brake shoes and calipers.

I'll post some pictures when I can, it looks awesome. Not nearly as heavy as a 9", I could tell when I carried it in.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
1969 15x10 295's for rear. Modifications needed?
  • normg
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
147
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
GypsyR
G
J
1996 v6-v8 swap
  • jujuonurmom
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
187
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
jujuonurmom
J
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
501
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 28, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
540
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
556
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?