• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

RHS Heads vs Canfield?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 65FBE2
  • Start date Start date Jan 23, 2010

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jan 23, 2010
#1
  • Jan 23, 2010
  • #1
So as luck would have it I was looking for a new set of heads for my 347. I found a set of Canfields at a shop that had some damage. The guy said they were very fixable and you would not be able to tell they had every had work done. I offered $800 for them if he fixed and freshened them up. He said no way, so I went looking elsewhere. I bought a set of New in the box RHS cast iron heads 200cc from a guy for $760(smokin deal). Guess who called and said he would take the $800 offer.
So now I own 2 sets of heads, Which ones to use is the question. The Canfields are better prepped as they have been ported and have 7/16 studs and 10* locks and of course are alum and the springs are set up for a solid roller. But my fear is they may be a little over kill. The RHS are set up for a solid flat tappet with .56 max lift.
The car is set up as a road course car with some limited street use. I would like a broad torque curve and would give a little on the top end to get it 2500-6800 rpm. Compression is around 10.3 with either head.
I have both a RPM air gap and old torker single plane (could use either)
1,5/8" long tube headers, 750 HP DP or 650 Mighty Demon Carb(could use either) 3.70 gear and T5z tranny. I will be buying a new cam to match what ever combo I go with.
Looking for any input you guys have to help make this a winning combo!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 23, 2010
#2
  • Jan 23, 2010
  • #2
What makes you think they'd be overkill ? Because of the springs ?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 23, 2010
#3
  • Jan 23, 2010
  • #3
I've got Canfield's equivalent of AFR's 165's on my 331 and have never wished or more. They work extemely well with a repop Ford 3x2 (highrise dual plane) and the Ford Z303 roller. Same compression you're running. Powerband runs from 1500 to 6500.
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jan 23, 2010
#4
  • Jan 23, 2010
  • #4
Well I will find out soon as I am having him flow test the Canfields but just judging them visual, I would guess they have a intake port volume in the 215cc plus range and I will be suprised if they flow less than 315. They were on a full tilt vintage race car. Do all Canfields have the raised exhaust port? If so have you had any header fitment issues on a 65-66 Mustang?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 23, 2010
#5
  • Jan 23, 2010
  • #5
Mine are raised too. No issues with headers in either my 77 Comet (same chassis as a 65-66 Stang) or when it was in my 89 Ranger. I had Shelby Tri-Y's in the Ranger, Hedman 4 into 1 long tubes in the Comet.
 

bikefreak600

Member
Dec 10, 2005
156
2
19
rochelle IL
Jan 23, 2010
#6
  • Jan 23, 2010
  • #6
keep the canfields. nice score for $800
 

S-Car-Go

Member
Mar 25, 2003
332
0
16
San Jose, CA
Jan 24, 2010
#7
  • Jan 24, 2010
  • #7
Before Canfield closed shop (retired) Jay Allen was a dealer and very familar with the heads. I'd call him and get cam and springs from him. He'll design a cam to work with those heads and help work out the rest of your combo.

Camshaft Innovations - Home
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jan 24, 2010
#8
  • Jan 24, 2010
  • #8
Thanks "snail". I will give him a call. I have used Cam Research in the past as he has a lot of Ford flow experience but he had a swing and a miss with my 289 convertible cam. It was way to mild and the car dies over 4,000 rpm. I have been looking for another custom cam grinder for a better fit for this upgrade.
 

S-Car-Go

Member
Mar 25, 2003
332
0
16
San Jose, CA
Jan 24, 2010
#9
  • Jan 24, 2010
  • #9
I've used Cam Research as well. The applications were different so I can't comment "who's better". I will say the buying experience was very different. Call C/R tell him what you got and what you want it to do, and the cam is in the mail in a day. CI will take longer and you will talk about every aspect of your combo (suspension, fuel system, ignition, etc). He is very concerned you get everything right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
309
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
533
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
748
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
275
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?