• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Roller Rocker Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95 stanger
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2007
9

95 stanger

New Member
Jun 1, 2005
17
0
0
Missouri
Aug 12, 2007
#1
  • Aug 12, 2007
  • #1
I am in the process of installing a new 331 shortblock that my builder installed a Crane Cam. The intake duration is 224 degrees and .542 lift, exhaust is 232 degrees and .563 lift with 1.6 ratio rockers. I have valve springs with a max. of .600. My question is: Is it safe to use my existing 1.7 ratio rockers or should I go to the 1.6 ratio? I asked my engine builder and he said it's not a problem to go with the 1.7. Doing the calculations I'm coming up with about .598 lift on the exhaust which is real close. I appreciate any advice in advance.
 

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
Aug 12, 2007
#2
  • Aug 12, 2007
  • #2
1.6 that what the cam was designed for plus why put that lift to limit the springs...if in doubt but the ed curtis PS3 spring upgrage but if it was me i would do 1.6's oh and i also have a 331 and went with 1.6's on my TFS stage 2 cam.
 
9

95 stanger

New Member
Jun 1, 2005
17
0
0
Missouri
Aug 13, 2007
#3
  • Aug 13, 2007
  • #3
Thank you Juiced_94gt. That was what I was leaning toward, but wanted another opinion. Guess I will have some 1.7 ratio Trick Flows with about 150 miles on them for sale.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 14, 2007
#4
  • Aug 14, 2007
  • #4
.563" divided by 1.6 = .352" lift at the lobe.

.352" x 1.7 = .598" as you stated on the exhaust side of things.

As stated, stick with the 1.6's to help your pistons and valve last
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
670
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Engine LOSS OF POWER AT 4,000 RPM.
  • Jarhead67
  • Nov 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
Jarhead67
J
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?