Yeah... but evidently very few of us actually visit the HOME page!timeless2 said:Yeah, on the StangNet homepage on Tuesday.![]()
04DarkShadowGT said:Pretty weak imo, dont get me wrong it looks great and depending on price it could be a worth it. But the normal gt is 300hp, you would think a shelby version would pack more than 25hp extra.
Duke309 said:why didnt they just bump it up to 350 and make it the gt-350?
CatmanJJ said:First the GT/CS and now the Shebly GT, anybody else gettin a little tired of these new "Special Edition" cars?
coming from the owner of a Mach 1MineralMan said:![]()
coming from the owner of a Mach 1
helty said:you're not alone. Im not the biggest fan of Ford using the Shelby name as much as it can before he croaks either. I mean it makes sense from a business standpoint, but I dont want to see what FORD can do if they're allowed to use the Shelby name.
I want to see what SVT can do with a blank canvas. I dont mind the Mach 1's or Boss's, bc they're an original Ford car. But Shelby this and Shelby that is getting old.
CatmanJJ said:Well if they actually made a new Mach 1 or another special ed. car that had an honest power increase and not just some stickers, scoops and a name (excluding the GT500 of course but who can really afford that car anyway) I'd be singing a different tune.
For instance I think like a GT330 with a n/a 5.4 would be hot. Instead we're gettin a bolt on GT with minor appearance tweaks and all of a sudden it's a Shelby, I'm not diggin it, maybe it's just me though.
MineralMan said:25 HP is not an honest power increase? I would say that most people's first mods only net them around the same 25 HP increase. While it may not be the same power increase that the Mach 1 had over the standard GT, it is still an increase.
I guess it's just me but most of these new gen SE Stangs just don't do it for me...yet.