• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Seen this yet? Shelby GT rated at 325HP.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Uncle Meat
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Aug 10, 2006
#21
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #21
MineralMan said:
25HP is more of an increase than the '01 Bullitt had over the '01 GT.
Click to expand...

well dont forget, the Bullitt had a lot of other things going for it. Better suspension, upgraded brakes, special interior trim pieces, some exterior mods, and the bullitt manifold is good for gains across the powerband (peak numbers arent everything). I think they are a very solid upgrade from the GT, especially when you factor in the price of upgrading your stock GT with all of the parts that the Bullitt has on it.

Then the Mach1 is another step above the GT, with similar suspension and brakes as the Bullitt but an engine that is in a class of its own. For the record, the Mach 1 4V 4.6 is not just a N/A terminator motor... a few things that come to mind is the 10:1 compression, shaker induction system, different heads, and aluminum block. It's a completely unique motor.

http://www.mach1registry.com/Specs/Specs.htm
 

VOORHEES

Stangnet's "35th Limited Edition" VIN Guy
15 Year Member
Nov 9, 1999
3,046
36
119
LaGrange, GA
Aug 10, 2006
#22
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #22
CatmanJJ said:
First the GT/CS and now the Shebly GT, anybody else gettin a little tired of these new "Special Edition" cars?
Click to expand...

Blame the 35th Anniversary "Limited Edition" GT's(hehe/own one) they were the first late model "Special Edition"(non Cobra) Mustang to sell well. 4628 made. And it was virtually unknown except by the true Mustang crowd. Then came the 2000 "Spring Feature" the 2001 BULLITT, the 2003 Mach and so on. Ford made 'em and someone bought them. Why should they quit?
I'm all for different flavors, because I remember the lean times(mids 80's til late 90's, when a "different" Mustang had to be built by the owner.
 

04DarkShadowGT

Member
Jan 31, 2004
474
0
17
Fort Wayne, IN
Aug 10, 2006
#23
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #23
The difference is the bullit was not much more $$ than the GT to buy while the mach 1 was 5K difference between base sticker prices. The shelby will most likely be 35K or so, so imo the extra 5-7K it costs should come with more than 25hp extra. If the shelby is like 30 then ok it would be worth it.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Aug 10, 2006
#24
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #24
04DarkShadowGT said:
The difference is the bullit was not much more $$ than the GT to buy while the mach 1 was 5K difference between base sticker prices. The shelby will most likely be 35K or so, so imo the extra 5-7K it costs should come with more than 25hp extra. If the shelby is like 30 then ok it would be worth it.
Click to expand...

That's another valid point. I guess we'll have to wait and see. I'm guessing somewhere between 30 and 32k sans dealer rapage but that's still a lot to me, pure speculation at this point though.
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Aug 10, 2006
#25
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #25
Duke309 said:
why didnt they just bump it up to 350 and make it the gt-350?
Click to expand...

I read somewhere that their suppose to come out with a Shelby GT350. It will be rated at 335HP.
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Aug 10, 2006
#26
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #26
I could have sworn that a Vortech supercharged 4.0 V6 was supposed to take the role of the GT350?
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Aug 10, 2006
#27
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #27
i wholeheartedly agree with another poster.

do a 5.4L with 3v(4v even better, but i wouldnt push the issue) heads mated to a cobra spec T56 and call it a GT-330. that setup would be capible of 350hp/tq easily, and would sell to people who want power without a power adder(sad it takes ford a supercharger to break 400hp while chevy is eying 600HP with the LS series stuff).

Neither Ford nor Shelby can use the GT-350 name, thusly the Newer hertz shelby's are called the GT-H, not the GT350H like the originals.
 

Tally_4.6

Member
Feb 26, 2006
195
0
17
Orlando
Aug 10, 2006
#28
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #28
I swear if i hear the name "Shelby" one more time tied with mustang i'm gonna lose it. How many more damn Shelby cars are gonna come out?!?!
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Aug 10, 2006
#29
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #29
Tally_4.6 said:
How many more damn Shelby cars are gonna come out?!?!
Click to expand...
Not to be a smartass, they'll keeping coming out until people quit buying them. Why else would they stop?
 

joshjwc9

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
1,095
17
39
Palm Harbor, FL
Aug 10, 2006
#30
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #30
thomas91169 said:
i wholeheartedly agree with another poster.

do a 5.4L with 3v(4v even better, but i wouldnt push the issue) heads mated to a cobra spec T56 and call it a GT-330. that setup would be capible of 350hp/tq easily, and would sell to people who want power without a power adder(sad it takes ford a supercharger to break 400hp while chevy is eying 600HP with the LS series stuff).

Neither Ford nor Shelby can use the GT-350 name, thusly the Newer hertz shelby's are called the GT-H, not the GT350H like the originals.
Click to expand...

That is what I thought was gonna happen after I found about about the body style change for 2005. But instead they released a 4.6 3 valve, then SVT said byebye and the GT500 cant be afforded by many.

Hate to say it, and it will offend some, but if the new Camaro is even remotely close in power numbers, when I go looking for a newer car in 2008 or 2009 I more than likely will pick the LS powered Camaro.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Aug 10, 2006
#31
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #31
i know for a fact ford has larger spec cams for the 5.4 3v. they are specifically for the 5.4. add hp and tq over the truck version. no other changes. just cams and tune.the question is if we will ever see those cams from the factory.
 

Kronos

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
101
0
0
the boondocks
Aug 10, 2006
#32
  • Aug 10, 2006
  • #32
Tally_4.6 said:
I swear if i hear the name "Shelby" one more time tied with mustang i'm gonna lose it. How many more damn Shelby cars are gonna come out?!?!
Click to expand...
you know back in the 60's Shelby and ford did the same thing thats why now with the retro style mustang they brought back the shelby's it only makes sense.
so why would you lose it when all ford is doing is trying to get their head out of their a i think its a good deal and one day in the near future they will make a mustang that does compete with the zo6 and the enzo and maybe by 2020 one will land on the moon on its own power
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
B
03 GT Forged Internals info ect.
  • Borla2K3
  • Jan 24, 2019
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2019
Dark04GT
G
1969 Shelby Mustang Gt 350 4-speed With Original Paint
  • geo0006
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2014
7991LXnSHO
G
Barn Find - One Owner 1969 Mustang Shelby Gt500
  • geo0006
  • Mar 19, 2014
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
916
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 19, 2014
geo0006
G
Shelby Gt350r Ford Mustang
  • MRaburn
  • Jan 12, 2015
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
12K
StangNet Site News Jan 12, 2015
MRaburn
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?