• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Should I believe this guy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68converted
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2008

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Nov 6, 2008
#1
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #1
I had a friend stop by and he told me that I did not need a Chip/tune with the setup I have??? The car is not running too bad, but it is putting out enough gas fumes to make your eyes water if it runs too long in the garage. He is an ASE Ford mechanic... What do you think?

Here is the setup: 73mm Meter (C&L-not changing it out, no mater how much grief I get), 70mm TB Edlebrock, ported Explorer intake, AFR 165 heads, 1.6 RR's, Comp Cams XE270 HR, stock bottom end, shorty headers 2.5" exhaust, H-Pipe, Dynomax Super turbo's

Every single person I have talked to on this thread and others that have helped on the project say yes I do.

The idle seems to wander a little, I have really good throtle response, awesome power (could always be better right), and it runs so cool that the fan only comes on after it is pulled back into the garage after a "quick" test drive. LOL

Just stinks pretty bad...
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Nov 6, 2008
#2
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #2
you can tune out all the idle surging and richness issues at idle. fix any drivebility problems. but with the mod you have, i wouldnt expect too much of a WOT power gain with a tune.

just got to ask yourself, do you feel its worth 500 ish dollars to fix whatever problems you have??

also think if your going to add a SC or something later on, if so i would wait and do it then.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Nov 6, 2008
#3
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #3
Thanks Foxfan88- I guess I just don't want to smell it after all the money I put into building it. (of course now the budget is gone, or at least expanded until next spring. LOL)

Oh, I forgot to add that I still have to add the eliminator kit for the smog, TAB/TAD.

Also,would a bad EGR cause any of this? Because I noticed that the little diaphram in it was kind of pushed out and off to the side. (I pushed back in, but when I started the car again, I noticed that it was kind of popped out again??)
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,205
17,891
224
Massachusetts
Nov 6, 2008
#4
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #4
Yiu should have codes for the bad EGR


Even if it was running great, i would recommend a custom dyno tune. It really is the best way to get a safe setup and get every bit of possible power out of the car.

if you are running pig rich though, you may have some other underlying issues.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Nov 6, 2008
#5
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #5
I know you are not changing the meter, but you do realize that the Maf meters air and helps control the mixture right? Not trying to give you grief, just realize, one of the main pieces of the puzzle you use, is a pos.

If you were to take the car to my friends shop to get a chip done, he would send you home or make you purchase a better meter before he even attempted to tune it. I think you'll find that none of the better shops want anything to do with a C&L.

That combo should not need a chip anyway, far wilder setups run fine without a program.
 

Badloser

New Member
Jan 4, 2006
8
0
0
Port St Lucie,Fl
Nov 6, 2008
#6
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #6
With all those good parts I think you will be very happy with a good dyno tune. Throttle response I know you said is good but it will be even better after you tune it. Also running too rich is not good for the motor in my opinion. I am going to guess a 10% HP increase with a good tuner at the controls..
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Nov 6, 2008
#7
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #7
2000xp8 said:
I know you are not changing the meter, but you do realize that the Maf meters air and helps control the mixture right? Not trying to give you grief, just realize, one of the main pieces of the puzzle you use, is a pos.

If you were to take the car to my friends shop to get a chip done, he would send you home or make you purchase a better meter before he even attempted to tune it. I think you'll find that none of the better shops want anything to do with a C&L.

That combo should not need a chip anyway, far wilder setups run fine without a program.
Click to expand...

I just knew you would chime in. LOL I do appreciate the opinion

Well, I just ordered a new EGR, ovalized tail pipes, and an MSD box from my website, along with some other small parts. Gotta get those jumpers (diodes I think for the TAB/TAD and smog - saw a post on that some time ago) I'll see if the little things can help first. I guess I have thru the winter to mess with it before a tune. I will post an audio clip on Saturday; ears can tell a lot.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Nov 7, 2008
#8
  • Nov 7, 2008
  • #8
Badloser said:
. I am going to guess a 10% HP increase with a good tuner at the controls..
Click to expand...

That number is pretty far off.
A car running a fox computer that is assembled correctly with the correct parts, will see almost no gain, if there is a gain, there is something wrong.
Some people claim driveability is better, that's somewhat believeable, just remember the fox computer is not restrictive, it will pretty much adapt to damn near anything, including rear wheel numbers well above 600rwhp.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Nov 7, 2008
#9
  • Nov 7, 2008
  • #9
200xp8 - "just remember the fox computer is not restrictive, it will pretty much adapt to damn near anything, including rear wheel numbers well above 600rwhp. "

I guess I have always been the type to watch what people do rather than listen to the garbage that flows out of their mouths to suite a specific conversation. I will assume that your ride is pushing well above 600rwhp, as you seem to be pretty fond of your friends tune shop, and you have "tuned" your ride a few times?? (I know your M.O. so I expect you to continue to add your two cents, please don't take offense as I won't be responding to you again. Dude, the dead horse thing... let it go. Jamming your opinion down peoples throats about your favorite meter is not helpful to anyone. I seriously don't care what meter you have, SERIOUSLY!)

Now, back to the topic. I have been reading a ton of info on the Tweecer and there are quite a few parameters that one is able to adjust; though I am not able to find "reliable" info on what "A9" series of EEC's are capable of adapting too.

I suppose what I would want to make sure of, is the computer is not working to bring the new addition's performance capabilities back to the programmed baseline. Without a tune, what is it in the programming that allows the flexability to change/adapt?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Nov 8, 2008
#10
  • Nov 8, 2008
  • #10
The Adaptive Strategy takes feedback from the O2 sensors regarding the AFR, and institutes a
'Correction Factor' (called the KAMRF) to the injector pulsewidth. The Adaptive Strategy in the A9*'s has a range of 25%... +/- 12.5%
Once you get out of that range, things get hoky.

Factory ecu's can adapt/tune to anything that baselines within this range (for the most part).
Boost and Nitrous is a little trickier, but there are plenty of guys running TwEECer and Moates chips. (I've only done n/a myself)

I used a tweecer to tune my 408w, and it worked great. Took a while to learn, but it is a very good tool.
$550 for the tweecer
$200 for a WB O2 sensor
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Nov 9, 2008
#11
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #11
68converted said:
200xp8 - "just remember the fox computer is not restrictive, it will pretty much adapt to damn near anything, including rear wheel numbers well above 600rwhp. "

I guess I have always been the type to watch what people do rather than listen to the garbage that flows out of their mouths to suite a specific conversation.
Click to expand...

I too like to watch what people do, the difference between us, is i do it in person, and you do it on the internet.
I also never said pro m is the only to use, i said C&L is the only meter not to use.
Good luck and i'll leave you be as requested.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Nov 9, 2008
#12
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #12
on stuff I have tuned with a PMS with bolt-ons like that motor, I have seen 8-12rwhp.

Usually just fuel "divots" to fix and added timing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
714
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?