• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Should I change subframe conn ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steel1
  • Start date Start date Nov 23, 2018

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Nov 23, 2018
#1
  • Nov 23, 2018
  • #1
My 93GT it has a pair of BBK round tube subframe connectors (no seat brace) that were installed 12 yrs. ago.
Installation is fine and I haven't had any issues with them but lately I've been wondering if I should switch them out
for a set of full length sfc.
Not sure if it would be worth cutting/removing old sfc for new full length ?
Car is just a street cruiser that doesn't get launched but I have recently installed a 393w making good power.
Any opinions/advice appreciated.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Nov 23, 2018
#2
  • Nov 23, 2018
  • #2
I wouldn't mess with it. If anything you could fab up a set of seat braces and weld them in.

Joe
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,067
1,654
194
NJ
Nov 23, 2018
#3
  • Nov 23, 2018
  • #3
Was the car ever a daily driver with them installed?
I had a pair of round non full length subs a long time ago.
They stood off the frame a bit and lacked surface connection welding (since they were round, they could only be welded at the bracket).
The subs were on the car as a daily driver and one day I put a jack stand under the middle of one and crushed it. Seemed water was getting it and rotted it.
The rounds also presented ground clearance issues and I couldn't get a jack under the sub itself leading me to deform the frame rail a bit.

After my experience? I regretfully say yes, I think you should change them to maximum motorsports full length.

The bonus is one day if you goto a torque arm, you are ready.
 
Reactions: RangerJoe

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Nov 23, 2018
#4
  • Nov 23, 2018
  • #4
2000xp8 said:
Was the car ever a daily driver with them installed?
I had a pair of round non full length subs a long time ago.
They stood off the frame a bit and lacked surface connection welding (since they were round, they could only be welded at the bracket).
The subs were on the car as a daily driver and one day I put a jack stand under the middle of one and crushed it. Seemed water was getting it and rotted it.
The rounds also presented ground clearance issues and I couldn't get a jack under the sub itself leading me to deform the frame rail a bit.

After my experience? I regretfully say yes, I think you should change them to maximum motorsports full length.

The bonus is one day if you goto a torque arm, you are ready.
Click to expand...
No never a daily since sub frames installed only a nice weather cruiser, they are in perfect shape.
Yes they are only welded at the brackets front end is capped and tubing measures 1.6" o.d.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Nov 23, 2018
#5
  • Nov 23, 2018
  • #5
I'd keep it as is. If you want to add significant rigidity, and you can weld, consider addding a jacking rail, and then add some spars to link the main SF connector to the JR.
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Nov 23, 2018
#6
  • Nov 23, 2018
  • #6
CarMichael Angelo said:
I'd keep it as is. If you want to add significant rigidity, and you can weld, consider addding a jacking rail, and then add some spars to link the main SF connector to the JR.
Click to expand...
Funny you mention jacking rails because I was considering this http://www.globalwest.net/915.htmling
to attach to my existing subframes.
I "can" weld it's not pretty but effective..lol
 
Reactions: Shakerhood

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,349
18,085
224
Massachusetts
Nov 23, 2018
#7
  • Nov 23, 2018
  • #7
If it ain't broke....
 
Reactions: Steel1

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,361
211
114
Ohio
Nov 24, 2018
#8
  • Nov 24, 2018
  • #8
Steel1 said:
Funny you mention jacking rails because I was considering this http://www.globalwest.net/915.htmling
to attach to my existing subframes.
I "can" weld it's not pretty but effective..lol
Click to expand...
I have actually been wanting to cut out my current SFCs for Global West ones, really like the way they mount compared to all the others.
 
R

rc46joe

Member
May 28, 2018
7
2
13
Bethlehem P.A.
Nov 24, 2018
#9
  • Nov 24, 2018
  • #9
I am going to cut my tube style SFC’s for a set of full Maximum Motorsports SFC’s. I think it’s worth it. Just my two cents.
 
S

Sunflower

Member
Jul 27, 2018
6
3
13
Bel Air, MD
Nov 25, 2018
#10
  • Nov 25, 2018
  • #10
I just finished installing MM long frame connectors under my 88 rag top, and WOW, the improvement in the stiffness is awesome. Doors close and open better than ever before.
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Nov 25, 2018
#11
  • Nov 25, 2018
  • #11
Thanks for all the replies.
I ended up ordering a set of stifflers jacking rails that I may eventually tie into
existing sfc. I need to straighten pinch welds anyways and will now have nice
jacking points in that area.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,067
1,654
194
NJ
Nov 25, 2018
#12
  • Nov 25, 2018
  • #12
I like the stuff stifflers makes. I have their trans mount crossmember. That thing is seriously stiff compared to the stock one.
I did Kenny brown jacking rails a while ago and I too had to straighten out the pinch weld.
If your welding skills aren't so great (mine are not), just be careful that metal is all so thin.
 
Reactions: Steel1
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
F
Getting my old autocrosser running again
  • flightops
  • Aug 28, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
373
The Welcome Wagon Aug 28, 2025
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?