• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Should I go to a 65mm Throttle Body?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJHA90
  • Start date Start date Apr 2, 2004

DJHA90

Member
Dec 17, 2002
581
0
16
Texas
Apr 2, 2004
#1
  • Apr 2, 2004
  • #1
Given the mods in my signature, would going to a 65mm TB do me any good -- or would it be a waste without heads?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 2, 2004
#2
  • Apr 2, 2004
  • #2
It's certainly not a waste. If I were you, I would go with a 70mm TB. Either will work, I just think that there is more to be had with a 70mm without losing low-end torque.

Joe
 

DJHA90

Member
Dec 17, 2002
581
0
16
Texas
Apr 2, 2004
#3
  • Apr 2, 2004
  • #3
I thought a 70mm on a mild engine would lose all sort of low end?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Apr 2, 2004
#4
  • Apr 2, 2004
  • #4
DJHA90 said:
I thought a 70mm on a mild engine would lose all sort of low end?
Click to expand...
That seems to be a common misconception around here. Ask Evan Smith what he ran on his Stock Eliminator, when he was using his stock U/L intake manifold. Ask Ed Curtis what he'd use. Ask a good SBF builder what he'd use. The idea behind why you will lose low-end torque is understandable, but the same theory can be applied to a lot of things that are just not true. My vote is for the 70mm TB.

Joe
 

jmuva44

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,338
0
36
Richmond, VA
Apr 2, 2004
#5
  • Apr 2, 2004
  • #5
Yeah, I was reading an article on yellowmustangregistry.com that said on a fairly stock engine, they actually picked up a tad more with a 70mm than a 65mm. I think that too many people on these sites just believe what others say without trying anything themselves and it eventually turns into a huge false rumor.

But to answer the original question...I think it would help certainly. But I, personally would rather spend the money elsewhere. Its just one of those parts that you dont get enuf out of it for what you pay for it.
 
3

306stang

Founding Member
May 11, 2001
64
0
0
Owensboro, KY
Apr 3, 2004
#6
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #6
I would go with 65mm, you will be fine with it as for the comment on the 70mm i have tryed it myself and in that case i lost 5 hp switching from the 65mm up to the 70mm. I strongly advise against the 70mm.
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Apr 3, 2004
#7
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #7
Is anything beyond a stocker really worthwhile at that level of modification? I can see it with new heads and cam, but with stock longblock .

Throttle body isn't on my "anytime soon" list of mods. I wonder if it should be?
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Apr 3, 2004
#8
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #8
my personal opinion is 70 is a bit too high, a 67 would be great, but oh well... go w/ a 65, you'll notice a ton of improvement in all sorts of areas over stock TB... but if you do heads and some other engine mods like that soon, then go w/ a 70 and accept the consequences in the mean time... you'll bog your engine w/ a 70 now... a 65 would be just about perfect for your current setup...
 

jmuva44

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,338
0
36
Richmond, VA
Apr 3, 2004
#9
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #9
Again, maybe it depends on the car, but i've seen tests where the 70 is an improvement over the 65 on a mild stang. Who knows...

But as mentioned above, the addition of either one will probably net you like 1-2 HP and similar if not worse TQ gains. Spend the money on somethin else man.
 

DJHA90

Member
Dec 17, 2002
581
0
16
Texas
Apr 3, 2004
#10
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #10
I picked up a brand new, still in the box, FRPP 65mm for $100. Gues it wont hurt now that I have it anyway
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Apr 3, 2004
#11
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #11
what about on a mild 351? I'll be using my same cobra upper so should I get the 65mm fms one or a 70 mm aftermarket one. I like the fms one since it's still a ford part and comes with a new oem tps.
 

jmuva44

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,338
0
36
Richmond, VA
Apr 3, 2004
#12
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #12
Again, I've never taken it to the dyno so I have, along with others her, no idea which one can be backed up by concrete data. But with a 351 I would go with the 70mm.
 
9

96darkhorse

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2001
693
0
16
wilmington, california
Apr 3, 2004
#13
  • Apr 3, 2004
  • #13
sorry to steal your thread but im currently building my h/c/i setup....gt40ps with 1.94/1.60 ferrea valves , fti cam, edel perf. intake.....would i benefit from a 65 or a 70 mm TB??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Idle issues….again.
  • Nostang25
  • Sep 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
173
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 7, 2025
AeroCoupe
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
362
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
985
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
M
94 Mustang gt throttle body
  • Mike3
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
399
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?