• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Should I rebuild bottom end??

  • Thread starter Thread starter BLK3DGT
  • Start date Start date Feb 25, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

BLK3DGT

Member
Feb 22, 2006
47
0
6
Feb 25, 2006
#1
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #1
I'm the original owner of a 1991 Mustang Gt with 125,000 miles. I replaced the headgaskets and had a valve job done on the stock heads at 100,000 mi.The car has been maintained regulary and does not smoke.
I just purchased Trick Flow's Street Heat top end kit complete with their twisted wedge heads. I was debating on pulling the motor and installing a 306 stroker kit from either DSS or Coast high performance.
I would rather spend the money on upgrading my AOD.
But, I don't want to install the new top end kit and have the bottom end crap out on me.I know that there are a lot of high mileage 5.0's out there that are still going strong. How long should I expect the bottm end to hold up with this kind of mileage? I would appreciate any recommendations.Thanks in advance.
Current upgrades 3:73 rear end, BBk equal length shorty headers,Bassani stainless X pipes with cats, Borla stainless cat back exhaust, Kenny Brown Level 1 suspension kit, 155 lph fuel pump, 73mm C&L MAF, Accufab 70mm throttle body w/spacer.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,072
2,673
224
Vass, NC
Feb 25, 2006
#2
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #2
If the motor has been well-maintained it won't crap out. Slap on the new stuff and enjoy.

Chris
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Feb 25, 2006
#3
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #3
As long as you took care of it like you said it should be fine. Just put that extra money in the AOD. How much longer it last depends on how well you take care of it.
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Feb 25, 2006
#4
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #4
The 306 is not a stroker, it is a .030" overbore. If you are looking to build in more power a bottom end rebuild is good insurance after the 100K mark.
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Feb 25, 2006
#5
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #5
If you rebuilt the bottom end now you could relax and not worry about it.It would be a waste of labor to build the top end then have to tear it down not long after to rebuild.But who knows,you could go another 5 years or longer without any bottom end problems.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Feb 26, 2006
#6
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #6
FastDriver said:
If the motor has been well-maintained it won't crap out. Slap on the new stuff and enjoy.

Chris
Click to expand...
 
C

criticman

Member
Sep 7, 2003
723
1
16
Rome, GA
Feb 26, 2006
#7
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #7
Don't toss money at something that works just fine unless you want to. I would trust your bottom end for now and go ahead with the top end install.

I say this because I am doing the same thing (blower instead of top end) and hoping the bottom end lasts. If not, I do want to do a mild stroker setup anyway, so a crapped out bottom end would be a good excuse to buy a short-block from RNH or CHP.
 
L

llwood

New Member
Feb 19, 2006
39
0
0
Feb 26, 2006
#8
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #8
well you might start by giving the the engine a compression test that will give you a good idea of how the bottom end is doing.
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Feb 26, 2006
#9
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #9
I got 197,240 miles on my stock 5.0 before the bearings gave out. It wasn't too bad, but you could see signs of wear when it was disassembled prior to rebuilding it.

Are you burining oil and losing compression? If not, just put your new parts on and enjoy it until you can afford having it rebuilt.
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
Feb 26, 2006
#10
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #10
If you are just doing the h/c/i swap, then you should be jus fine with your stock bottom end. If your gonna throw on a supercharger later, Id rebuild now, and upgrade the critical peices.
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Feb 26, 2006
#11
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #11
I would at least do a compression test and leakdown test first.
 

gcwh02

New Member
Jun 20, 2005
515
0
0
pottstown, PA
Feb 26, 2006
#12
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #12
I would do up your AOD first, get the 306 in, put on the TF top end, and be done with it. Whats the point of taking that whole top end off again and throwing it on a new motor, a waste of time or money. No need to tear it all back up again. And then if your even want a power adder, pop it on.
 
B

BadAndy

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2001
766
0
0
Ohio
Feb 26, 2006
#13
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #13
they always seem to last way past 200.000, you are just geting broke in
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Feb 26, 2006
#14
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #14
BadAndy said:
they always seem to last way past 200.000, you are just geting broke in
Click to expand...
That seems to be true in a lot of cases.I think though that when we read about disappointing dyno results after someone has done just the top end upgrades,it is perhaps sometimes due to a tired bottom end.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Feb 26, 2006
#15
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #15
Topdowncruise said:
I would at least do a compression test and leakdown test first.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Also, what does your oil pressure look like? Hook up a mechanical oil guage (factory units don't tell you much) and take a look. You should be running 15+ psi at a warm idle, and 40-50 psi when the engine is warm and under load ideally. If your oil pressure looks good, as do the compression and leakdown checks, you should be golden. Don't just guess, take your time and check it out; it will pay off in the end.
 
B

BLK3DGT

Member
Feb 22, 2006
47
0
6
Feb 26, 2006
#16
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #16
I did a compression check this afternoon and all cylinders were at 125 lbs. I was planning on replacing the oil pump. I should be able to get to it without pulling the motor right?
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Feb 27, 2006
#17
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #17
BLK3DGT said:
I did a compression check this afternoon and all cylinders were at 125 lbs. I was planning on replacing the oil pump. I should be able to get to it without pulling the motor right?
Click to expand...

Don't bother until you verify what your oil pressure actually is. No sense putting a new oil pump on an engine with worn bearings. Getting at the pump with the engine in the car is a pain. You have the option of dropping the k-member (bad option) or loosening your motor mounts, and lifting up the engine to get the oil pan off and out. Again, your going to feel stupid if you do this, and you have poor oil pressure anyway due to worn bearings.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Feb 27, 2006
#18
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #18
I had 135k on my stock bottom end when I did my H/I/C.
I did a compression test to make sure everything was within spec. If it's working fine now, just run it. There is some piece of mind knowing that the bottom end has less chance to fail but the stock bottom end should be more than strong enough for an H/I/C with 125k on it. No use replaceing things that are in working order.
Kevin
 
B

BadAndy

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2001
766
0
0
Ohio
Feb 27, 2006
#19
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #19
Sicarius428 said:
I had 135k on my stock bottom end when I did my H/I/C.
I did a compression test to make sure everything was within spec. If it's working fine now, just run it. There is some piece of mind knowing that the bottom end has less chance to fail but the stock bottom end should be more than strong enough for an H/I/C with 125k on it. No use replaceing things that are in working order.
Kevin
Click to expand...

very true!!!! if it is-not broken ,dont fix it
 
B

BLK3DGT

Member
Feb 22, 2006
47
0
6
Feb 27, 2006
#20
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #20
Thanks Bad Andy, I received more plus messages to go ahead and installed the h/i/c than not too. The compression readings were 125-130-lbs. some say this is low others say not bad for a motor with high mileage. anyway i'll be putting it together soon.
Thanks
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
751
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
534
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?