• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

smart to build a high compression hyper 306?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IndyBlk5.0
  • Start date Start date Feb 24, 2004

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 24, 2004
#1
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #1
Well its been awhile for an update.... so... bought 3 core radiator, sn 95 dual speed fan... should work well... as for engine, short block went to the machine shop... originally was going to use my same pistons and everything (standard bore) until i found that cylinder number 6 and 7 were off .012 from standard bore... So scratch that cheap idea ... So..... i plan on building a high compression hyper pistoned 306... What would be the best compression ratio (preferrably highest) that i could go that would still be streetable and a daily driver? I was thinking 11:1, but now think probably 10.5:1 is better, what is your thoughts? Remember, this is a budget build... i am paying a tad over 1000 for a compretely redone shortblock (timing chain oil pump etc...) built complete... Block is getting decked... heads milled... blah blah... So my question, is it safe to do a high compression hyper pistoned 306? if so, what is the highest compression ratio you guys would go with a streetable daily driver motor? Thanks!!!
 
K

kndyblucapri

New Member
Feb 17, 2004
22
0
0
NY
Feb 24, 2004
#2
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #2
yea u can get hypereutectic pistons up to 11.1:1 compression those pistons can take up to 400 hp and u can get a set pretty cheap but your compression could vary depending on your heads the machine shop or who ever is gonna build the engine can figure it out with the set of heads u got.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 24, 2004
#3
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #3
stock ported e7's, they are getting milled too along with the block is getting decked...
 
K

kndyblucapri

New Member
Feb 17, 2004
22
0
0
NY
Feb 24, 2004
#4
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #4
summit sells a set of keith black pistons with a .200 dome for 222 bucks u could find them cheaper speed pro sells some cheap pistons
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 24, 2004
#5
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #5
yeah im not going to run any type of boost hense the compression, no need.. breaks things...
 
9

90stangLX302

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
76
0
0
Good ol' Bellaire Ohio
Feb 24, 2004
#6
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #6
I thought this might help with figuring out the compression
http://www.prestage.com/Car+Math/En...tors/Calculate+Compression+Ratio/default.aspx
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 24, 2004
#7
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #7
i will have to ask my machine shop what the specs are on my block etc... might find that out tomorrow... still need a good answer, what is better to do? 10.5 or 11:1 on daily driver?
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 24, 2004
#8
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #8
bump
 
E

eric88gt

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2000
163
0
16
Chisholm, MN
Feb 24, 2004
#9
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #9
I would stick with 10.5:1 compression since you're going to be running cast iron heads. The gain in power from 10.5:1 to 11:1 wouldn't be worth the added hassle of dealing with the strong possibility of detonation.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 24, 2004
#10
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #10
I've heard that 11:1 is pushing it, especally with iron heads. Stock heads are 61cc chambers, while most aftermarket heads have different combustion chamber volumes, so if you went in the mid 10's in compression now and then got some of these heads you would be near 11:1.

A question I have, what kind of increase in tq and hp would he see by replacing the worn factory shortblock with a new, higher compression shortblock assuming everything else stays the same?
 
E

eric88gt

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2000
163
0
16
Chisholm, MN
Feb 24, 2004
#11
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #11
If you go from 9.0:1 to 10.0:1 you probably wouldn't gain a lot of HP, maybe 10-15 at peak. You would however fatten up the torque curve before and after the peak HP and TQ occurred. You would also notice a little quicker throttle response with the higher compression motor.

Oh and yes you'll be fine with 10.5 to 1 with hypers. Just be careful with detonation, hypers won't take as much as a forged piston would.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Feb 25, 2004
#12
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #12
90mustangGT said:
Stock heads are 61cc chambers,
Click to expand...

They're 64cc.
 

billetunderwear

I've posted way more than my fair share of pointle
20+ Year Stangneter
May 14, 2002
1,148
0
36
Rohnert Park, Ca
Feb 25, 2004
#13
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #13
The irons won't dissipate heat as well. They will be more detonation prone. Just keep that in mind.
 
C

custom90GT

Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
521
0
16
Fort Collins, CO
Feb 25, 2004
#14
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #14
heh, im running about 11.2:1 compression on Hypers and GT-40s (yep, the orig iron ones). Just add some Tolulene every fill up. I wanna get out of it though and run AFRs, but I'd like to boost compression up to 11.5:1 when I do that.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 25, 2004
#15
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #15
well i told my machine shop to build me a 9.5:1 motor, he said any higher i would have problems with ping on pump gas.
 
S

Silentst2000

New Member
Sep 28, 2003
145
0
0
Feb 25, 2004
#16
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #16
IndyBlk5.0 said:
well i told my machine shop to build me a 9.5:1 motor, he said any higher i would have problems with ping on pump gas.
Click to expand...


I'm not trying to start a flame war but what allows the RSX type S to run 11:1 compression on pump gas? Why couldn't we use colder plugs and an MSD ignition to help with pinging at 11:1? Or a lower temp themostat?

I don't dig Honda's. I'm just trying to figure out the enemy works.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Feb 25, 2004
#17
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #17
IndyBlk5.0 said:
well i told my machine shop to build me a 9.5:1 motor, he said any higher i would have problems with ping on pump gas.
Click to expand...

Good move. If you ever drive any place that only sells 87 or 89 octane, your engine will thank you.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Feb 25, 2004
#18
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #18
anyone know what the stock compression ratio was for our stangs? and did the forged pistons compared to the hyper pistons in 93 make any difference in compression between the two? He is putting 9.5:1 pistons in it, but my heads have been milled twice and my block got decked, so i could be seeing more of a 10:1 compression range... Question - how much hp would a full point of compression be worth? Thanks
 
H

HemiChallenger

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
26
0
0
Walled Lake, MI
Feb 25, 2004
#19
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #19
It all depends on what kind of pump gas is readily available near your house. 93 is the normal here, 91 is normal in other states I know. People who live in the city by me, and have a pump with race gas will always build high as hell compression engines because the fuel is readily available. I wouldn't push it any higher than 10-1 or 10.5-1 with any sort of common premium pump gas.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
New Edge 3.8L Forged Internals
  • NtheGAME
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
729
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2025
Noobz347
Engine An engine building combo with stock Speed Density (SD) system
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
897
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2025
Mcmahst
Engine Raising compression on a relatively stock 302
  • keel
  • Jul 9, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2023
keel
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
816
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?