• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

SN95 GT owners opinion on MAC dumps

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stangarossa
  • Start date Start date Nov 24, 2009

Stangarossa

New Member
Nov 17, 2009
0
0
0
Ontario
Nov 24, 2009
#1
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #1
Just wanted a few opinions from some fellow SN95 GT owners.
I currently have factory header/converter set up with MAC Muffler chambers. The car seems too quiet for my liking.
Does anyone have experience with either installing MAC dumps on a similar set up, or cutting off the tailpipe and installing turn downs of the muffler outlets to mimick the MAC dumps?
If so, I would like to know your opinions..
Too Loud?
Any annoying drone?
Any issues with E-Tests when needing the e-test facilty to have access to installing the tailpipe sniffer equipment?
Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
 
3

302GTS

If you need herpes, I'm your man!
Apr 20, 2009
481
2
18
Largo, FL
Nov 24, 2009
#2
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #2
I don't have the Mac dumps, so my help isn't exact, but my exhaust system is a BBK o/r x-pipe, mated to dumped Flowmaster 44's. The drone is there, but TBH isn't bad. I've driven 2 hours straight on the interstate, and my girlfriend was able to sleep throughout the drive with no problems. I do have the stock 2.73 gear though, so my revs aren't super high in 5th. The sound isn't loud from inside the car IMO, and I've actually had someone else drive my car past me. It sounds so much better with dumps than tail pipes to my ears, and the volume level is justtt fine, but it doesn't get carried away inside the cabin.
 

Dan95-5.0

Active Member
Jun 14, 2003
1,110
0
36
Manitoba, Canada
Nov 24, 2009
#3
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #3
I see your from Ontario. I'm sorry LOL

I installed a Mac Catback and loved the sound. gave it that true mustang sound. When i had a catless H-pipe installed the car was a new beast. Loud as hell. Now I have a Mac X-pipe catless and it sounds great. Mac is a really loud exhaust and i cant imagine what mac dumps would sound like.

If you didnt have the e test to worry about i would just get a catless midpipe and your grin will be hard to remove.
 
R

Rookie71

Member
Jul 25, 2006
28
7
19
Nov 24, 2009
#4
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #4
I don't have an SN95 and I don't have Mac dumps, but I do have a fox and I went from a 2.5" Flowmaster catback with tailpipes to a 3" Dynomax Ultraflow catback with dumps and too me it is just a very different setup tailpipes vs. dumps. With dumps you get a lot of constant noise due to reverb from the sound resonating under the car. I will be going to an Ultraflow with tailpipes setup in the future.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Nov 25, 2009
#5
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #5
My $.02... dumps have no business on a street car. I think you'll be happy with the new noise for about a week then be wishing for tails. It's not actually "louder" your just moving the noise closer to you. The true volume is achieved by either a high flow, or off-road, aftermarket midpipe. More air = more volume. Similarly, replace your stock heads, camshaft, and intake, and you'll notice a huge increase in volume as you are now pushing more air out the exhaust.

Adam
 

n.e.mich

New Member
Sep 23, 2009
8
0
2
Tawas City, MI.
Nov 25, 2009
#6
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #6
I have MAC headers, off road x-pipe, and 2 1/2" MAC dumps and I love the sound!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 25, 2009
#7
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #7
I love my dumps. Tail pipes are extra weight.

Kurt
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Nov 25, 2009
#8
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #8
Black95GTS said:
My $.02... dumps have no business on a street car. I think you'll be happy with the new noise for about a week then be wishing for tails. It's not actually "louder" your just moving the noise closer to you. The true volume is achieved by either a high flow, or off-road, aftermarket midpipe. More air = more volume. Similarly, replace your stock heads, camshaft, and intake, and you'll notice a huge increase in volume as you are now pushing more air out the exhaust.

Adam
Click to expand...

im kinda with adam on this. i'm not a fan of the dumps really. doesnt sound bad but i just think tailpipes give the exhaust a more pronounced, crisper sound. with dumps its just going to be a low tone vibration. i ran flowmaster 40s on my 95 with turn downs ( o/r x pipe ) and got tired of it in a few weeks.

just my opinion, i think you will be happier with a mid pipe change. getting rid of those restrictive cats will make the car quite a bit louder - even with tailpipes.

something else to think about: with dumps, all that exhaust gas, soot, carbon, etc has to go somewhere......which will be ALL over the underside of your car. it will also create a swirl effect when exiting out from behind your car which will create a film all over your rear bumper ( i speak from experience - its a pain to get off ). also, those exhaust gases arent the best to be breathing and you will smell them with dumps.

not trying to talk you out of them, just some things to think about.
 

Stangarossa

New Member
Nov 17, 2009
0
0
0
Ontario
Nov 25, 2009
#9
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #9
I am starting to think leave good enough alone. I recently had to take off my fi-flow cats which sounded awesome as they failed e-test. So I now have a quiet car, with slightly less performace and am out money to boot for these cats that supposidly where 49 state compliant. I was looking to get some sound back without wasting more cash if things go wrong. Thanks for your opinions. I guess I'll stick with a quiet car or at leat until I win the lottery....
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Nov 25, 2009
#10
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #10
Stangarossa said:
I am starting to think leave good enough alone. I recently had to take off my fi-flow cats which sounded awesome as they failed e-test. So I now have a quiet car, with slightly less performace and am out money to boot for these cats that supposidly where 49 state compliant. I was looking to get some sound back without wasting more cash if things go wrong. Thanks for your opinions. I guess I'll stick with a quiet car or at leat until I win the lottery....
Click to expand...

might not hurt to call up the company that makes that catted hi flow mid pipe you have. if its advertised to pass emissions and didnt, they *should* be willing to do something about.

its worth a shot.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 25, 2009
#11
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #11
Let me clear some rumors up here while I have the opportunity. Dumps do not signifigantly effect the sound of the exhaust. All they do is direct the exhaust downward. Bad droning and vibration comes from using cheap mufflers, like Mac and Flowmaster. If you put a quality muffler on the car, you aren't going to have a problem. You get a little exhaust smell when you sit still, but it's fine when you are moving. I've never seen a car with dumps have any buildup of carbon or anything else on the underside of the car.

Kurt
 

Stangarossa

New Member
Nov 17, 2009
0
0
0
Ontario
Nov 25, 2009
#12
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #12
Yeah, I emailed back and fourth with them with all of the details, results before and after with their cats vs. mine. They left me high and dry...... My Nitrous oxide readings with their cats that I only had 5000 kms on, was over 810 PPM, when I put my original 15 year old converters back on, I was at 60 PPM. The etest results don't lie..... So needless to say, after wasting over $500 on their product and a few hundred on trying to figure out why my car was failing has me nervous to want to go buy hi-flow cats again...
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Nov 25, 2009
#13
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #13
revhead347 said:
I've never seen a car with dumps have any buildup of carbon or anything else on the underside of the car.

Kurt
Click to expand...


...

maybe no one elses does .... but mine did . my car never smoked or used oil either.
 

Stangarossa

New Member
Nov 17, 2009
0
0
0
Ontario
Nov 25, 2009
#14
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #14
I gotta say, I was really disappointed w/ the hi flo cat manufacturer. I only drive my car about once a week in the summer time and its runs supper clean. When I looked at my final etest that passed with my factory cats, it actually had lower emissions readings than when I bought this car over 2 years ago. I guess this cars like wine, it improves with age... I guess you live and learn.... I am glad you where fortunate to deal with a stand up company...
 

Kornnut

Founding Member
Nov 25, 2000
1,999
48
108
Tulsa
Nov 26, 2009
#15
  • Nov 26, 2009
  • #15
http://s164.photobucket.com/albums/u37/Lord_Kornnut/black car/?action=view&current=ad6cdeb2.flv
My car with mac dumps




My dumps when I bought them used. Little carbon build up on them. I love dumps on 94-98 cars. The look without tail pipes is clean.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 26, 2009
#16
  • Nov 26, 2009
  • #16
I think the sound change is from the fact the noise is now bouncing off the underside of the car...and close to were you sit so your kind of like in a exhaust speaker box.

I am not a fan of dumps. For the simple fact I do not like driving my car to work or anywhere else and smelling like exhaust. Plus SS tail pipes do look nice...weight of tail pipes is fairly low on the weight dumping list and not that much weight either. Its also weight in the back and low in the rear so its probably not hurting but helping to a larger extent.

I actually sold my O/R H for a BBK catted X to quite my car down a little. I do have some 10yr old Flowmasters (I put on in 99) may replace with magnaflow but I need to rebuild my rear end this winter and looking to do a Astro/Gforce next year so its not high on the priority list.
 

Stangarossa

New Member
Nov 17, 2009
0
0
0
Ontario
Nov 27, 2009
#17
  • Nov 27, 2009
  • #17
I only drive my car once or twice a week in the summer. Its a convertible, so I only drive on nice days with the roof down. I am guessing with the open cockpit, I would not be effected as much by exhaust fumes and or droning through the cab as I have a lot of fresh air flowing around (at least when the cars moving). Each time I read another thread, it makes me re-think the situation. I guess I have all winter to figure it out... If anyone has a vert with dumps, please let me know your thoughts....
 

Twista

Active Member
May 7, 2004
510
2
29
@ the z00 in chicago
Dec 1, 2009
#18
  • Dec 1, 2009
  • #18
get rid of the stock hpipe for a O/r.. itll be loud!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 1994 GT 5L Trickflow h/c/i Tremec TR3550 Saleen copy - $7000 (Ann Arbor, MI)
  • no_fox_given
  • Mar 21, 2019
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
9K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 21, 2019
no_fox_given
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1996 Mustang Gt Convertible Pi Swapped
  • RedFord96
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 2, 2016
RedFord96
R
D
SN95 95 Auto V6 To Manual Obd2 5.0 Complete
  • DieselDan
  • Jun 23, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2015
02 281 GT
  • Locked
SOLD 1989 Mustang Gt 333 Turbo In Pa
  • madspeed
  • Mar 28, 2015
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
7
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 16, 2015
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?