• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

solid lifter / roller lifter question

  • Thread starter Thread starter fford
  • Start date Start date Jun 9, 2008

fford

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2000
1,020
0
37
Palmyra, PA
Jun 9, 2008
#1
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #1
I have a question on a solid lifter motor that came out of a ford truck. will it work in place of a roller lifter motor coming out of a grand marque (87) with aftermarket heads? I will also be using 1.6 RR with guide plates. My assumption is the lash setting (0 lash + 1/2 turn) is the same and I will have to see about push rod length. is there anything I am missing?
Thanks for the help.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jun 9, 2008
#2
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #2
I'm not 100% sure I understand the question. The truck should have flat tappet lifters, instead of solid rollers. The engine itself would work, but if you're still running EFI, you'll need a 351W cam, to keep the HO firing order. Otherwise, as far as I know, the procedure to set the lash is the same with stud mount rockers.

Moved to 5.0 Tech.
 

fford

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2000
1,020
0
37
Palmyra, PA
Jun 9, 2008
#3
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #3
Thanks for the response. Let me see if I can clarify a little. My brother has a grand marque that for his own reasons wants to modify a little, it has a 302 in it but the throttle body is mounted on the drivers side which limits upper intake options, that aside I have a motor rebuilt that was a truck motor and does have solid lifters in it but he wants to put it in the car. So if I understand correctly we order up a 351W cam with lifters and it will drop in and work off the EEC computer?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jun 9, 2008
#4
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #4
Ah, that makes more sense, sorry. I was thinking you were talking about this for your 92 GT listed in your signature (could be lack of reading comprehension on my part). He should be able to run a standard 302 firing order with the Grand Marquis, but it might need a MAF swap of some sort, in order to run properly. The Grand Marquis should still be a speed density engine in 87. Any aftermarket intake should work though. Just need to flip the upper plenum around.
 

fford

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2000
1,020
0
37
Palmyra, PA
Jun 9, 2008
#5
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #5
yeah, bit of an odd build up. So I just use a standard 302 solid cam/lifter set up and it will work fine? I know that the push rods will be different, I'll have to measure up for those when I have the cam in.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Jun 9, 2008
#6
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #6
Correct. The Grand Marquis should have the 1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8 firing order, versus the 1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8 order for the 302 HO/351W.
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Jun 9, 2008
#7
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #7
Edelbrock intakes work either way. a little off topic but i saw you where looking for intakes.
 

fford

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2000
1,020
0
37
Palmyra, PA
Jun 9, 2008
#8
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #8
good to know, I have an edelbrock intake in the attic I can sell him now!
 

fford

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2000
1,020
0
37
Palmyra, PA
Jun 9, 2008
#9
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #9
what would you have to do to convert that motor to a roller, just a set of roller lifters with the spreader bar on it?
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
Jun 9, 2008
#10
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #10
fford said:
what would you have to do to convert that motor to a roller, just a set of roller lifters with the spreader bar on it?
Click to expand...

that and drill/tap the valley to accept the bolts for the lifter guide retainer
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
Jun 9, 2008
#11
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #11
If the block from the truck is not a "roller ready" block (E5xx, E6xx or E7TE casting number), you need to install link-bar lifters to be able to use regular base circle HR cams..... if you use the spider-dog bones retrofit kit, you'll be limited to reduced base circle HR cams only.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
315
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
591
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
D
Rockers, lash adjusters and timing: help with parts (4.6 2v)
  • dvigAtel
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
254
Other Auto Tech Nov 1, 2025
dvigAtel
D
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
951
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?