• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Some chevy guy's decided to admit the truth.......

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cwalk
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Apr 30, 2007
#21
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #21
slow95gt said:
gtp's, custom ported intake(stock style. but bigger than a gt40) bcam, 65mm tb, 70mm maf, the heads have been built up nicely with crane springs and such, no porting, polished valves. lots of timing LOL and a 4cyl t5 with 3.27's. we started out in 2nd and I laid into it, spinning and hooked the instant i hit 3rd, and put 3 cars on him before i went to 4th, and this thing was sounding nasty, i bout crapped myself after i beat him LOl
Click to expand...

Sounds like you got LUCKY there. We had and still have a hard running GT40P combo similar to yours, and from a roll race wouldnt walk an LS1 that easily. Ours trapped 110-112 all day long, and thats right where a mild bolt on LS1 will trap, not too mention LS1 are roll race cars for the most part...

One day some Mustang owners will admitt that the Fbodies are great cars, and lots of times faster than a Mustang!
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Apr 30, 2007
#22
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #22
I just think it's funny that the chevy guy brag about beating foxbodys.They have more cubic inchs than us first off.I ran an 88 camaro at the track when i first got my stang (88GT) i was all stock,the camaro had cold air,gear,exhust.I out ran him by about five cars. At we got back to the staging lanes he came over and asked me what i had done.I told him it was all stock.He said there was no way. I open the hood and showed him he just couldn't believe that he got out ran.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
Apr 30, 2007
#23
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #23
LOL, I read the whole thing. Like Stangnet, there are some people over there who have no idea what they are talking about. Honestly, I'll be surprised if Chevy ever follows through with the Gen 5 Camaro and the Challenger due to their financial situation.
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
4
36
NJ
Apr 30, 2007
#24
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #24
I'm trying to stick up for us Ford guys in that forum. And they know absolutely NOTHING about Mustangs, its not even funny.
 

Cwalk

New Member
Sep 25, 2006
78
0
0
Virginia Beach, Va
Apr 30, 2007
#25
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #25
Did you see that one dude brag about spending 8k just to get in the 12's? I would sell my car if it took 8k to get into the 12's, lol.
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
4
36
NJ
Apr 30, 2007
#26
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #26
hahah yea, those damn motorboat sounding camaro guys just dont understand.
 

JSSuper455

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2002
197
0
16
UT
Apr 30, 2007
#27
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #27
25thmustang said:
One day some Mustang owners will admitt that the Fbodies are great cars, and lots of times faster than a Mustang!
Click to expand...

Yup, I'll admit it! Of the many years of these cars existence. Mustang wasn't as fast as a comperable Camaro or Firebird or Challenger. Yes they had options that were close and fairly comparable and some years they were higher performing.

An all out ground pounder isn't why I drive a Mustang daily. Its because it offers decent power, fun driving, reliable, an instantly recognizable styling, and mostly its very nice driving car that is comfortable. Far more comfortable than driving a 4th gen F-body. I know that becuase I tried back in early '01. The Mustang was far nicer to drive for me at 6'7" and had plenty of power for what I wanted.

Its this fact that is precicely why the Mustang is doing so well. Some people just want a sporty stylish car thats great to drive... Hence the V6 Stang sells so well. Its the primary reason the car is still around as its the "backbone" or "Cash-cow" of the line.

As for performance... well during the period they were alive. The V6's duked it out at the same level, but the Z-28/SS was far on the oposite end of the spectrum. That is what the Cobra model was for. Mustang GT's sat nicely in the middle with nothing from GM to compete with it in price/performance.

Think of it like this.

Base Mustang - - - - - - - - - - - - Base Camaro / RS
+
+
+
+
Mustang GT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+
+
+
+
Mustang Cobra - - - - - - - - - - - - - Z-28 / Formula-Trans Am
. . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SS / WS-6
That is really how the chart looks up until F-body demise in late 2002. The price and performance level is pretty par with Cobra, and thats what the Cobra was for...

But umm, I like both... Just can't comfortably ride/drive the 4th gen cars from GM
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Apr 30, 2007
#28
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #28
i'll throw some sticks into the fire we have here.

fords sound better! ;D
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
May 1, 2007
#29
  • May 1, 2007
  • #29
Foxfan88 said:
i'll throw some sticks into the fire we have here.

fords sound better! ;D
Click to expand...

Now that's a downright lie. Not even a matter of opinion imo.
 

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
May 1, 2007
#30
  • May 1, 2007
  • #30
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Best part...i laughed out loud on that one. Those guys truly need to get to know the competition better.
Click to expand...

haha i did the same thing.. laughing out loud haha
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
May 1, 2007
#31
  • May 1, 2007
  • #31
no one said anything about LS1 powered fox Mustangs on there
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
May 1, 2007
#32
  • May 1, 2007
  • #32
Cwalk said:
Did you see that one dude brag about spending 8k just to get in the 12's? I would sell my car if it took 8k to get into the 12's, lol.
Click to expand...

I lol'd on that one too

Moron. What a waste of money. My god you could buy a fox, rebuild it, and supercharge the built motor for that much.
 

91ghp5.0

Active Member
May 25, 2005
42
0
28
Somewhere
May 1, 2007
#33
  • May 1, 2007
  • #33
Strype said:
I lol'd on that one too

Moron. What a waste of money. My god you could buy a fox, rebuild it, and supercharge the built motor for that much.
Click to expand...


Let me know when you do that, caus I'll be there. It would have to be a hunk outside.

Don't get me wrong, I love the stang, but it takes some cash as well to get in to the 12's.

F bodies, and all LS 1 and LS 2 cars are fast. I don't mess with any of them at the moment. Now with new heads and an intake, it'll be a different story. I'm probably even with LS 1's for the time being.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
322
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
408
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
567
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Project Fox Revival (please send help)
  • sleep-e
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
249
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2026
KRUISR
T
2008 GT Parasitic drain - sjb
  • turcotjs
  • Aug 1, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
225
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 1, 2025
turcotjs
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?