• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Spyder Intake II(Anybody using this intake from CHP(Coast High Performance)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bditty50
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2007
B

bditty50

Member
Jun 20, 2005
170
0
16
Tampa, Florida
Jan 2, 2007
#1
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #1
I was looking at this intake for my later twin turbo build. I was wondering has anybody used it? Does it flow nicely? It looks like a very nice intake for boost. Does it have hood clearance issues?

http://www.coasthigh.com/Fuel Injection/spyder.htm
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Jan 2, 2007
#2
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #2
i have the Spyder for my stroker, ive seen teh spyder II listed on thier site, but i am not sure what the difference between the two is.

Thought i read somewhere that they use a japanese knockoff of the spyder to make the II.

it does NOT clear the stock hood, CHP assured me that it would clear, but they were incorrect. the screws from the TPS sensor hit the hood, causing it to not close. I had to dimple my stock hood to get it to latch. Keep in mind i was using poly mounts too, so that might have been a cause as well, but i cant be sure.
 
B

bditty50

Member
Jun 20, 2005
170
0
16
Tampa, Florida
Jan 2, 2007
#3
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #3
Thanks man, I really like the style of it. Does it give good power and what is the power levels is it mid or low range? I'm using an aftermarket eventually so it isn't a huge worry for me. I like that it doesn't have a huge upper plenum which makes it hard to mess with the fuel injection.
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Jan 2, 2007
#4
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #4
Mid to upper range, i had it on a 306 with AFR 185s and lemme tell you, the thing was a DOG before 4K.

but if you are doing a stroker, or power adder, it cant be beat for high HP. you will sacrifice some torque though.
 
B

bditty50

Member
Jun 20, 2005
170
0
16
Tampa, Florida
Jan 2, 2007
#5
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #5
I'm doing a tt setup on my coupe so it might be good since the turbos will fill the gap for low end. Did you end up getting rid of the spyder intake or the car?
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Jan 2, 2007
#6
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #6
nah, still have both, just building yet another engine for the car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
889
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
733
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?